Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Would you do bareback  (Read 8705 times)

Offline smiths

If a Pro$$ie offers bareback I assume she is either

A. Already infected and as such doesn't care
B. Drug addict / Alcoholic and very desperate
C. Forced
D. Mentally unstable
E. Combination of the above

As such all good reasons to avoid  :hi:

Indeed, should be a sticky for tempted punters to read, it might put at least some off BB. ;)

Offline Marmalade

Or she might just be fucking stoopid.

Smiths, I have great respect for your field reports, but now you're just being nanny. I'm not even convinced that such questions are genuine. I'm not saying it is a troll question, but it is typical PN fodder, lets hype a health scare, treat punters like muppets, and tell them what they can do.

I have been quite clear, I do not advocate bareback and do not fuck prossies bareback. But a punters health is his own business, and yours is too.

There's even a highly systemised scene in Germany involving scrutinised testing of same day playmates. I'm not saying its perfect but we could argue about that till kingdom come as well, and I am not a specialist doctor with accurate figures of transmission rates in specific WG populations.  The forum, rightly IMO, is about finding paid sex. This rash of 'let's have a sticky' for everything is patronising bloody nonsense.

Offline Whore Of Babylon

I don't partake in bareback and never will but everyone has a choice and if they feel it's worth the risk then you won't find me becoming high and mighty on the subject.
But would stress it's worth looking at the risks and making an informed decision

Don't care about naming prossies. The responsibility to protect your health is your own. Many WGs , I'm sure have boyfriends etc who have non-protective sex. You can protect yourself and use condoms they're very effective if used correctly.
I wouldn't get all moral mini about it.
« Last Edit: January 04, 2013, 06:46:46 PM by Whore Of Babylon »

Offline Ali Katt

Quote
Many WGs , I'm sure have boyfriends etc who have non-protective sex.
I think the ones who post bareback pics on their profiles and say it is their boyfriend or regular partner and that they never do bareback are bullshitters. Why post that if it's not offered? and Why post a disclaimer? Why not just not use bareback pics?

Offline Inked

I'd rather pass a thousand kidney stones than bareback a Pro$$ie

Offline Miss A Squires

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 296
I think the ones who post bareback pics on their profiles and say it is their boyfriend or regular partner and that they never do bareback are bullshitters. Why post that if it's not offered? and Why post a disclaimer? Why not just not use bareback pics?

I think that's a very valid point. The profiles are meant to demonstrate what you offer, be that a certain outfit or sexual service. Its like showing a picture of you taking it up the arse but then saying I don't do anal - why post a picture of it then?

It's ridiculous and it's Russian Roulette like any other STD. You might be okay this time, next time you might get HIV and your life's ruined forever or you might get her pregnant and be screwed over for child support for the next 18 years.

Offline Bluemark

I have done bareback with 3 WGs (out of approx 100).  I came in 2 of them.  All of the WGs were clean, attractive, healthy, normal and stable; not skanks or druggies!  I got tested before and after - all tests negative.  I possibly got one pregnant, she had to take the morning after pill.

Bareback sex is definately better than sex with a condom.
All 3 of the WGs said they only allowed me to do this.  I have only asked 4 WGs for bareback sex in my life, so 75% agreed.

I wonder how many others would agree? 

Offline skittish

I possibly got one pregnant, she had to take the morning after pill.

 

WTF? So she could tell she was pregnant the next morning? Do us a favour we're all above the age of 14 on this forum.
« Last Edit: January 08, 2013, 08:05:07 PM by skittish »

Offline Ali Katt

WTF? So she could tell she was pregnant the next morning? Do us a favour we're all above the age of 14 on this forum.
Agreed. Bluemark I think you are a troll, you've started pointless threads and posted pointless replies to get a reaction.

Offline hotmint

I have done bareback with 3 WGs (out of approx 100).  I came in 2 of them.  All of the WGs were clean, attractive, healthy, normal and stable; not skanks or druggies!  I got tested before and after - all tests negative.  I possibly got one pregnant, she had to take the morning after pill.

Bareback sex is definately better than sex with a condom.
All 3 of the WGs said they only allowed me to do this.  I have only asked 4 WGs for bareback sex in my life, so 75% agreed.

I wonder how many others would agree?

The problem is, regardless if she is attractive, not a druggie etc etc etc,  you will never know what happened earlier or yesterday, or the day before.   If she does bareback for you, she is doing it with others, what were those others doing earlier or yesterday
It just goes in a circle of possible disease and ...... never assume if you have a test directly afterwards that you are clear,   HIV can a take a while to appear on tests and so can many other nasties.
The girl might think she is clean, but she did bareback with a carrier the day before, chances you are going to catch it sooner or later.

A chat with your doc is a good idea or maybe an early booking with your local undertaker

Offline Ali Katt

The problem is, regardless if she is attractive, not a druggie etc etc etc,  you will never know what happened earlier or yesterday, or the day before.   If she does bareback for you, she is doing it with others, what were those others doing earlier or yesterday
It just goes in a circle of possible disease and ...... never assume if you have a test directly afterwards that you are clear,   HIV can a take a while to appear on tests and so can many other nasties.
The girl might think she is clean, but she did bareback with a carrier the day before, chances you are going to catch it sooner or later.

A chat with your doc is a good idea or maybe an early booking with your local undertaker
Bareback is always going to be a controversial subject some like it and are willing to take the risk others aren't.

I called bluemark out as a bullshitter I doubt, any of what he say is true.

Offline Marmalade

Bareback is always going to be a controversial subject some like it and are willing to take the risk others aren't.

I called bluemark out as a bullshitter I doubt, any of what he say is true.



True or not, most posters who harp on about barebacking seem to be trolls, bullshitters or out-and-out psychos.

The commonest bareback troll is almost of the reverse of the 'concerned' troll. Instead of showing a gentle manly interest in your possibly 'dubious' habit of punting, the bareback troller likes to fill you and others with revulsion about the 'disgsting' things that 'punters' get up to (ie punters like him). As well as barebacking, forced sodomy, revenge tactics, or anything else that gets punting a bad name - all up for grabs by the troll.


Offline joshwinkers

Christ I'd love to do bareback, I don't really enjoy penetrative sex with a condom with the majority of girls unless they're particularly tight (having a small cock probably doesn't help tho!) but I'd never do with a working girl because one (relatively) short moment of happiness could lead to HIV/Aids and then never being able to have unprotected sex with a partner again - not that I have one at the moment, but I hope I will in the future.

If I was ever diagnosed with a terminal disease (non-sexual, ie Cancer) I probably would if I'm completely honest, but it would be my final ever punt, as I wouldn't want to risk infecting anyone else. But other than that scenario (which to be honest I hope doesn't happen) it's sadly never going to take place.

Offline Miss A Squires

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 296
Christ I'd love to do bareback, I don't really enjoy penetrative sex with a condom with the majority of girls unless they're particularly tight (having a small cock probably doesn't help tho!) but I'd never do with a working girl because one (relatively) short moment of happiness could lead to HIV/Aids and then never being able to have unprotected sex with a partner again - not that I have one at the moment, but I hope I will in the future.

If I was ever diagnosed with a terminal disease (non-sexual, ie Cancer) I probably would if I'm completely honest, but it would be my final ever punt, as I wouldn't want to risk infecting anyone else. But other than that scenario (which to be honest I hope doesn't happen) it's sadly never going to take place.

Or you could have a relationship with a non WG.

Don't care about naming prossies. The responsibility to protect your health is your own.

^ This.

No prossie is strapping your down and forcing you to bareback her.

Regarding all those harping on about never booking a prossie that has ticked bareback - you have no idea what goes on in any WG's personal life or how many times they have ticked, unticked, advertised or withdrawn bareback in their prossie career especially under all their various working names and aliases. If you knew you would probably give up punting altogether.

Bareback threads are started by 3 types of posters:
1. Trolls
2. Punters that want to do it and are looking for some kind of validation or excuse to do so.
3. WG's on a overzealous safe-sex awareness crusade.

Offline joshwinkers

Or you could have a relationship with a non WG.

I really really hope that happens again. But I'm a bit rubbish on the dating front, which is why I'm here, currently at least.

Offline Whore Of Babylon

Your choice but I wouldn't be a cunt muppet, stick a rubber on it!

Offline joshwinkers

I'd only be doing it if I was dying and it was going to be the last ever time I have sex - there's no way I'd risk an STD whilst I'm still (relatively) young and hope one day to be in a relationship and not punt any more.

Offline skittish

I'd only be doing it if I was dying and it was going to be the last ever time I have sex - there's no way I'd risk an STD whilst I'm still (relatively) young and hope one day to be in a relationship and not punt any more.

If I was dying, sex with prossies, protected or otherwise would be pretty low on my bucket list.

Offline yumyum3

Quote
Your choice but I wouldn't be a cunt muppet, stick a rubber on it!
Very drole.  :D Until you PM me your AW/webpage I remain skeptical you're who you say you are  :hi:

Offline nwguyuk

I have read of ladies offering bareback if you have a clinical test on the same day of visiting them.
As far as I understand this is how the porn industry operates too so surely it works on some kind of level?

Offline tda666

I'd only be doing it if I was dying and it was going to be the last ever time I have sex - there's no way I'd risk an STD whilst I'm still (relatively) young and hope one day to be in a relationship and not punt any more.

I am sure you will be in a relationship one day for certain but as far as giving up the punting ...? Well it seems to me that after marriage then kids, after a few years you will very probably be back on it again !!!

Just for the purpose of this thread, there is absolutely no way I would ever do bareback with a WG.

Offline mh

I have read of ladies offering bareback if you have a clinical test on the same day of visiting them.
As far as I understand this is how the porn industry operates too so surely it works on some kind of level?

Load of crap. A clear STI test tells you that you were clean about 10 days ago (at the time of the test) and results take days to come through.

Only the very dimmest of the dim would propose this.

The porn industry works by requiring all participants to have regular tests and takes it on trust that they don't do bareback other than with similarly tested participants. But I have read of significant outbreaks of serious STIs up to an including AIDS in the porn industry in USA at least. It's no surprise really.

Offline JulesVerne

If someone has always used a condom for sex, and has been tested negative twice with a 6 month gap, surely that person can't possibly have any infection? If that person does bareback they are only risking their health, and not the health of the woman. Only one in 5 million white British heterosexual women has HIV, and most of those will be drugs addicts. Also even if you have sex with a HIV carrier you are not guaranteed to catch the disease. So bareback is not as risky as claimed. You are more likely to die in a car crash or accident! I would risk bareback, but she would have to be very special, and only after knowing someone for a couple of months.

Offline Marmalade

The discussion can go on forever. Even among experts. Different testing systems etc etc. Waste of space on a punting forum imo. Also seems to attract people who don't post on punting.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)