Does UKP affect the service you get?

[Zero to Hero]

I was wondering guys, do you think if a WG's knows your on or you use UKP that you get a better service/ discounts in order to affect your review of them?

I don't Hide the fact I use UKP and tell WG's I meet if it comes up in conversation and through my brief punting career I have had the odd offer of a discount for a good review on here but never took them up on it as they weren't amazing to begin with.

has anyone ever had a similar experience and taken the girl up on the offer?

[Ben4454]

Personally I never reveal that I post on UKP to a working girl. I would like to think the service standards would be the same.

[stevedave]

Personally I never reveal that I post on UKP to a working girl. I would like to think the service standards would be the same.

Agreed. The girl may well work it out afterwards though if she is aware of UKP and reads reviews. So it may be mentioned on second meets.

I've certainly never had a girl offer a discount for a good review, and as nice as a discount would be I'd never accept - it's dishonest towards fellow punters. If a girl deserves a good review, she gets a good review. If she doesn't, she won't.

[Silver Birch]

I have mentioned UKP only once pre-punt and realised afterwards she might have taken it as a veiled 'incentive' (threat) to perform extra well. In hindsight, she did seem a little taken aback when I mention ukp. That was not my intention and I never did it again.

I have had one or two post punt chats that included ukp, but never been asked to do a review on here, in fact I don't think the wgs that I have spoken to about ukp, really like the detailed reviews.

[Happylad]

No. I doubt if my regular is even aware of the existence of UKP, and the service I receive from her has always been excellent, or she wouldn`t be my regular.

[OakTree]

I'd never mention beforehand I was a member of a forum. It may well come across as a veiled threat to make sure they perform better.

It's just not the done thing in my book.

[RedKettle]

I'd never mention beforehand I was a member of a forum. It may well come across as a veiled threat to make sure they perform better.

It's just not the done thing in my book.

my position absolutely

also try not to let on after

[claretandblue]

Never mentioned it pre punt,just don't think it's necessary or appropriate.

I have chatted in general terms about this site but never any specifics, only one wg knows who I am on here and she worked it out herself, personally think it's better to keep these things separate which is another reason why I don't understand the appeal of the uke site to punters

[mrhappypants]

I have tried dropping the fact that I write reviews on every possible occasion but the results have been a bit dissapointing.  I told one working girl that I had kissed the hem of West8's robe but she just looked at me like I was a complete cunt.  On another occasion I was discussing politics mid blowey, as you do, and shared that my views on  Brexit had been influence by Jimmy Redcabs position - she gave my knob a buff with a wet wipe before resumingwhich I took to be a sign we were in agreement.

Dave

[smiths]

I was wondering guys, do you think if a WG's knows your on or you use UKP that you get a better service/ discounts in order to affect your review of them?

I don't Hide the fact I use UKP and tell WG's I meet if it comes up in conversation and through my brief punting career I have had the odd offer of a discount for a good review on here but never took them up on it as they weren't amazing to begin with.

has anyone ever had a similar experience and taken the girl up on the offer?

Nowadays I don't mention I am a member, when I was posting on another now useless punting forum I did and indeed punted with a number of WGs who were members of it as well. Then occurred an indiscretion where one WG mentioned something to another and I decided not to punt with forum WGs again, though I did recently but wasn't aware she was one. Or I had already punted with the WG before they joined or they joined afterwards.

I wish to be as anonymous as I can but still do reviews, if a WG works out who I am such if life, all she will have is my punting number, easily changed and my description. A good WG will offer good service anyway, no need for me to say I post on here.

[Bangers and Gash]

I'd never mention it, but reading the reviews on here it seems more and more members are openly admitting to using the PM systems of UKP and UKE when setting up punts.

[cueball]

I'd never mention beforehand I was a member of a forum. It may well come across as a veiled threat to make sure they perform better.

It's just not the done thing in my book.

+1

Ukp is a punters gaff and best left out of post podge conversations

[mikexxlong]

I think pro$$ie’s dislike UKP, as it’s too truthful, about prostitution

As it gives punters a voice, enabling us to review, & put other fellow punters wise about good/bad SP’s
Also informing us about everything we need to be aware off. So punters are less vulnerable
Without UKP pro$$ie’s and pimps could get away with shit more easily and they don’t like it

And I don’t think it is wise letting pro$$ie’s know you are a member of UKP as

1)   It can change the way you are treated ,to influence any reviews you may post .thereby giving a false impression to other punters on here
2)   If they know your username because you told them or they put  2&2 together from reviews etc. they can put a face/ distinguishing marks etc. to a name & number, and may inform other pro$$ies that you have seen or possibly thinking about seeing via your posts on here, plus their circle of pro$$ie mates
3)   You might find it hard to book pro$$ie’s if they know you are a UKP member
4)   Once you realise anonymity is being eroded you could possibly start to feel more vulnerable about posting HONEST reviews ,defeating the purpose of the forum
5)   Could potentially lead to cyber stalking
6)   Possibly set up for a shoeing pre or post punt , because of posts on the forum

Probably more reasons but that’s just a few that come to mind

[ickydicky]

I have tried dropping the fact that I write reviews on every possible occasion but the results have been a bit dissapointing.  I told one working girl that I had kissed the hem of West8's robe but she just looked at me like I was a complete cunt.  On another occasion I was discussing politics mid blowey, as you do, and shared that my views on  Brexit had been influence by Jimmy Redcabs position - she gave my knob a buff with a wet wipe before resumingwhich I took to be a sign we were in agreement.

Dave

couldnt have been much of a bj if you were talking about boris and callmedave during it.

[Roth]

I'd never mention beforehand I was a member of a forum. It may well come across as a veiled threat to make sure they perform better.

It's just not the done thing in my book.

+1000.  Agree.

[snugs]

I was wondering guys, do you think if a WG's knows your on or you use UKP that you get a better service/ discounts in order to affect your review of them?

I don't Hide the fact I use UKP and tell WG's I meet if it comes up in conversation and through my brief punting career I have had the odd offer of a discount for a good review on here but never took them up on it as they weren't amazing to begin with.

has anyone ever had a similar experience and taken the girl up on the offer?

Funny enough the last WG I was with actually recommended UKP to me due to being new to punting and all, suggesting I check reviews on here rather than going off AW reviews.

[peter purves]

Never mentioned it pre punt,just don't think it's necessary or appropriate.

I have chatted in general terms about this site but never any specifics, only one wg knows who I am on here and she worked it out herself, personally think it's better to keep these things separate which is another reason why I don't understand the appeal of the uke site to punters

 

[JupitersBurning]

I personally wouldn't tell them. From personal experience the WG an suddenly go weird on you :/

[G.Raff]

Never tell a prossie I'm on UKP, and even when reviewing I try not  to give details that might identify me to her so I tend to post after a few days at least.

[Marmalade]

It's none of a prossie's business if you are on UKP and may place you in a difficult position.

Of course, if you happen to be a fluffy cunt that cares only about himself and his dear, wonderful, leeching, pimped out, non-tax-paying, lazy, disingenuous, 2-bit, skanky, unpresentable, gold-digging, lowlife, fake-identitied, slot-machine whores, grovelling in the hope of a nice word from his mirage of a perfect princess, the most beautiful girl he's ever scene, perfect in every way, about whom it would be ungentlemanly to give intimate details, basically a traitor to other punters, well that sort of person will rush home to pen some trite soft porn about his goddess's 10/10 charms (or maybe 11, maybe as high as he can count) then such a revolting specimen will probably flaunt his membership, tell her yo 'look out' for his 'review' and feel content that he, complete fucking scumbag that he is, is so much better and cleverer than other punters and gets such superior service from the most beautiful women that others can only dream about. One piece of slime on UKP, a very pleasant chap in every other way when posting, actually boasted how his "technique" of promising a good review would guarantee him first class service. One might suspect that any WGs with a sense of decency would tell him to go fuck himself, but most would tolerate it. Seems he didn't technically break any rules but maybe Admin has kicked him off for being a complete cunt.

Telling prostitutes that you use UKP is like inviting a potentially scheming bag lady into the gents toilets while your mates have their pants down and promising to say nice things even when she goes through their jacket pockets. Such creatures in my opinion should stay on ES or AW when typing, and not besmirch thr hard work and integrity that has gone into UKP.

[char45]

I don't but I did have one bid on a reverse booking and suggest I look up her reviews on here which I thought was a nice touch

[mikexxlong]

It's none of a prossie's business if you are on UKP and may place you in a difficult position.

Of course, if you happen to be a fluffy cunt that cares only about himself and his dear, wonderful, leeching, pimped out, non-tax-paying, lazy, disingenuous, 2-bit, skanky, unpresentable, gold-digging, lowlife, fake-identitied, slot-machine whores, grovelling in the hope of a nice word from his mirage of a perfect princess, the most beautiful girl he's ever scene, perfect in every way, about whom it would be ungentlemanly to give intimate details, basically a traitor to other punters, well that sort of person will rush home to pen some trite soft porn about his goddess's 10/10 charms (or maybe 11, maybe as high as he can count) then such a revolting specimen will probably flaunt his membership, tell her yo 'look out' for his 'review' and feel content that he, complete fucking scumbag that he is, is so much better and cleverer than other punters and gets such superior service from the most beautiful women that others can only dream about. One piece of slime on UKP, a very pleasant chap in every other way when posting, actually boasted how his "technique" of promising a good review would guarantee him first class service. One might suspect that any WGs with a sense of decency would tell him to go fuck himself, but most would tolerate it. Seems he didn't technically break any rules but maybe Admin has kicked him off for being a complete cunt.

Telling prostitutes that you use UKP is like inviting a potentially scheming bag lady into the gents toilets while your mates have their pants down and promising to say nice things even when she goes through their jacket pockets. Such creatures in my opinion should stay on ES or AW when typing, and not besmirch thr hard work and integrity that has gone into UKP.

Totally agree

I have noticed a few members that can get defensive and protective of whores, When some harsh truths about pro$$i£’s are posted,
 They never go as far as to be so blatant, a blind man could see where their loyalties lie, but they tip their hand just enough as they can’t quite help themselves

That I reckon are closet fluffy, white knight creeps, the proverbial snakes in the grass, that undermine the ideals of the forum and would fuck over forum members/ punters, the types that given the chance would cause all sorts of shit in others peoples personnel lives in their pathetic attempts in gaining the approval from “their” unscrupulous trollop(s)

Fucking degenerate weasels the lot of them, no one has any respect for them, not even the cunt who they worship by donating their money and speaking words of betrayal

Yes some reviews are a little sugar coated and sickly, maybe it’s the pent up hormones they have

[FlyingBreadMan]

One or two models figured out I provided a review, but I never talk of it.

I tell them I was banned as a fluffy twat if they push for some kinda review.

[poseidon]

I don't talk about UKP outside of UKP... ever.

If a girl has to ask me to give them a good review (and same for civvie businesses who ask/bribe for reviews), she has no chance of getting a positive from me.

If one asks if you are a UKP member, you can always tell them you only lurk and read reviews.

[Brazilian Martian]

It's none of a prossie's business if you are on UKP and may place you in a difficult position.

Of course, if you happen to be a fluffy cunt that cares only about himself and his dear, wonderful, leeching, pimped out, non-tax-paying, lazy, disingenuous, 2-bit, skanky, unpresentable, gold-digging, lowlife, fake-identitied, slot-machine whores, grovelling in the hope of a nice word from his mirage of a perfect princess, the most beautiful girl he's ever scene, perfect in every way, about whom it would be ungentlemanly to give intimate details, basically a traitor to other punters, well that sort of person will rush home to pen some trite soft porn about his goddess's 10/10 charms (or maybe 11, maybe as high as he can count) then such a revolting specimen will probably flaunt his membership, tell her yo 'look out' for his 'review' and feel content that he, complete fucking scumbag that he is, is so much better and cleverer than other punters and gets such superior service from the most beautiful women that others can only dream about. One piece of slime on UKP, a very pleasant chap in every other way when posting, actually boasted how his "technique" of promising a good review would guarantee him first class service. One might suspect that any WGs with a sense of decency would tell him to go fuck himself, but most would tolerate it. Seems he didn't technically break any rules but maybe Admin has kicked him off for being a complete cunt.

Telling prostitutes that you use UKP is like inviting a potentially scheming bag lady into the gents toilets while your mates have their pants down and promising to say nice things even when she goes through their jacket pockets. Such creatures in my opinion should stay on ES or AW when typing, and not besmirch thr hard work and integrity that has gone into UKP.

Well said  the first paragraph sums up Atticus finch and his partner in fluffy arms Unclesnideheart