Kim-London & xxMollyxLondonxx - Duo LONDON

[2chunky2]

Kim:
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Molly:
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

£400 / 1 hour Incall

On my recent travels to London I’d arranged to meet up with Molly again.  I ‘m not going to give her the full review here as she has been well-reviewed before.  I’ll just say she was her usual delightful filthy self.  She asked me if I fancied a duo with her friend.  I thought fuck it, in for a penny…

So I met Kim_London for the first time.  I checked after the meet and found she had no reviews on here.  So here’s a quick intro to Kim based on my experience....

Only the one photo on her profile but it’s accurate.  She was as her photo.  Beautiful figure, a few small tattoos and her hair was a bit shorter than her pic.  Hot.

So, the meet.  Kim joined us whilst I was balls deep in Molly.  What happened after that was rather frantic and a pleasurable blur.  Kim really got into it.   Lots of energy, rode me like her life depended on it.  Very responsive to oral (came twice).  All round, a big wow from me.

Fucked royally by two pros.  The hour was gone before I knew it.

She is in the 250/hr premium bracket I know, but I would see her again if our paths ever crossed again which is (sadly) unlikely.

[king tarzan]

1st woman offers bareback
Yet no owo

Weird that does not make sense

[ClarkeOfTheCourse]

1st woman offers bareback

Thanks for the warning. 

Molly works with a few ex Maxes girls so I'd give them a wide berth now too.

[Roth]

OP is asking God the review to be removed cos of mistaken identity.

Either he booked em and fucked em or he didn't?

Maybe the prossies concerned are putting him under pressure cos the thread comments from others are negative?

[2chunky2]

Hi.  Just to address this briefly.

OP is asking God the review to be removed cos of mistaken identity.

Either he booked em and fucked em or he didn't?

Didn't book through AW. Saw the profile of Kim_London when I wrote the review. AT THE TIME the face was blurred.  After the Bareback thing had been flagged I checked the profile again.  The profile pic's face was now not blurred and I realised that was probably NOT the girl I saw.

As this was potentially an error on my part I have asked that this be rectified on the basis (a) I have potentially reviewed the wrong girl on here & (b) maybe wrongly associated this girl with another working girl.

To sum up, I have potentially (& accidentally) provided an inaccurate review.  This is why I have asked for this review to be taken down as it potentially inaccurate.

Maybe the prossies concerned are putting him under pressure cos the thread comments from others are negative?

There has been no contact whatsoever, nor would I entertain it if it did.


Lastly, to clarify. There was no bareback or unsafe sex during this meet.


That's all I am going to say on this.  Your opinions are your own business.

Regards