Bella baby - Colindale

[Northlondonash]

Hi guys,

First time poster, long time lurker.
Decided to get involved as this site has helped me out and I wanted to give back a little.
Not going to be an overly long review as she has had a few reviews already.
Bear in mind, Iv read some of the extensive, creative reviews on here and I'm not going to fluff it out with all that!

In short, a decent and cheap punt.

Facially: Looks weathered. She met me in a dressing gown with no makeup but as someone had already said, she's no looker that's for sure. I knew this anyway so was not deterred. Photos on AW are accurate.

Body: slim, 6-8.

£60 p h, was out after 40-45 (my decision to leave)

Services we engaged in: owo / dfk / cim

Met her in a modern block of flats, buzzed me in. Didn't say much due to poor English.
I had a quick shower as I came from work and was gestured to lay on the bed when I returned.
She started sucking straight away (wasn't even at a semi yet!)
Decent technique, little use of the hands and didn't stop for quite some time.
Balls got a good sucking and licking too.
She then started rubbing my arsehole before slipping in a finger!
Kinda took me by surprise 😂

Sucked me for a good 35 before I popped (cim). She didn't ruin the orgasm by stopping as some girls have done in the past!
Didn't fuck her but tbh didnt fancy it either. I only really see WGs for BJs!

My mistake is that I always think 1 HR bookings are ideal, but after 1 pop, all I want to do is gtfo ASAP! Left after 45.

All in all, I'd say it was a positive but i didn't exactly request much so not much opportunity for it to be negative

Link External Link/Members Only

[smiths]

Hi guys,

First time poster, long time lurker.
Decided to get involved as this site has helped me out and I wanted to give back a little.
Not going to be an overly long review as she has had a few reviews already.
Bear in mind, Iv read some of the extensive, creative reviews on here and I'm not going to fluff it out with all that!

In short, a decent and cheap punt.

Facially: Looks weathered. She met me in a dressing gown with no makeup but as someone had already said, she's no looker that's for sure. I knew this anyway so was not deterred. Photos on AW are accurate.

Body: slim, 6-8.

£60 p h, was out after 40-45 (my decision to leave)

Services we engaged in: owo / dfk / cim

Met her in a modern block of flats, buzzed me in. Didn't say much due to poor English.
I had a quick shower as I came from work and was gestured to lay on the bed when I returned.
She started sucking straight away (wasn't even at a semi yet!)
Decent technique, little use of the hands and didn't stop for quite some time.
Balls got a good sucking and licking too.
She then started rubbing my arsehole before slipping in a finger!
Kinda took me by surprise 😂

Sucked me for a good 35 before I popped (cim). She didn't ruin the orgasm by stopping as some girls have done in the past!
Didn't fuck her but tbh didnt fancy it either. I only really see WGs for BJs!

My mistake is that I always think 1 HR bookings are ideal, but after 1 pop, all I want to do is gtfo ASAP! Left after 45.

All in all, I'd say it was a positive but i didn't exactly request much so not much opportunity for it to be negative

Link External Link/Members Only

This WG offered the punter Borehamwood BB when he punted with her, he declined and did a negative review which is linked in to this thread. I had punted with her myself and gave a positive review but had to go to the GUM earlier than usual and fortunately tested negative no thanks to that filthy skank.

[Northlondonash]

Whoa - that escalated quickly. This was about a month ago so I had not seen that review!
Thanks for the heads up.
But worrying to say the least 

Edit: having thought about it now - perhaps I did see it?! I didn't seem to make the connection for some reason. Dammit, I now notice that it was borehamwoods review that had the statement "she's not a looker"....:shakes head:

[smiths]

Whoa - that escalated quickly. This was about a month ago so I had not seen that review!
Thanks for the heads up.
But worrying to say the least 

Edit: having thought about it now - perhaps I did see it?! I didn't seem to make the connection for some reason. Dammit, I now notice that it was borehamwoods review that had the statement "she's not a looker"....:shakes head:

Indeed, I was worried as well, good luck at the GUM I hope you test negative.