Sugar Baby?
Masaj
Shemales

Author Topic: X~ Samantha ~X Norwich incall. TOFTT  (Read 1338 times)


3 review(s) for X~ Samantha ~X (1 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline uutarn

 External Link/Members Only

100 squids, 1 hour. Bargain basement deal.

Don't you just hate it when things don't go according to plan?

Comms were perfect. AW message was answered within the hour. Sent a booking, all confirmed within another hour, sorted.
Phoned me on the day with room number.

Ninja'd past reception then through corridors that lit up as i walked through them... reminded me of westworld (holy shit i'm that old  :angry:).

Greeted by a good looking woman of medium to largish build. The profile says size 12 and its probably right, no fat, just on the large side. I knew this going in of course. The pics are her but tend to be flattering to her size. I would hazard a guess at mid twenties...? Nice handful of titties, few small tattoos.
Relaxed demeanor and we started chatting and touching etc pretty much as soon as i entered.

Samantha is a great kisser. Her oral very good also, plenty of mixing it up, licking balls, stroking etc. RO was received with much enthusiasm which was nice and clean and smelt good. In fact she smelt good all round.
I couldn't wait to get inside her... and that punk ass piece of shit down below decided to have a nap! :dash: Why? I mean seriously.
Samantha was great though, she had the techniques to get the little fucker back up... eventually.

Now i know she has squirting on her profile but i always take that with a pinch of salt, not with Samantha! As soon as she started to ride me a gush of juice came out all on my cock and i gotta say
that was as sexy as fuck. After very energetically riding me for a bit we swapped to mish so i could watch myself fucking her. Again, after a bit of that and encouragement from Sam, she came (genuine) and again squirted, fucking amazing as i have never experienced this before (the squirting bit, not the making a woman cum bit :P).

After that she gave me intense oral for about 10 mins and i finished off over her c cup titties. Chatted for a bit, then i fucked off nearly dead on the hour. She didn't clock watch btw and i didn't feel hurried at all.

Synopsis
Samantha is a good fuck. Energetic, relaxed, skilled and can squirt. Taking into account of her inexperience (i might be wrong in this assumption though) well, you wouldn't know TBH. Its like she has been doing it for 10 years.

So why the neutral?
Combination of two things i think. She just didn't do it for me and numbnuts down below deciding to fuck off half way through.
Next time he decides to put on his parts, i'll chop the cunt off... had it up to here with his shenanigans!  :dash:

I digress. The neutral is not because she didn't do what was expected or didn't deliver well or anything.
A neutral based on how i felt afterwards and reflected upon.
I hate this acronym  but "YMMV" definitely applies with Sam.

A new addition to louise's troupe, and worthy of it. Sadly, Samantha just didn't do it for me, not her fault though.

Would i see again? Nope. The mental wall is there now and i know Mr. floppy will return.
Would i recommend? Yes. I'm sure others will get more out of Samantha than i did. Even if it is just to experience the squirting.
« Last Edit: May 18, 2016, 10:18:56 pm by uutarn »

Neal69

  • Guest
Thanks for a vey interesting and honest review Uutarn.  :drinks:

I found it interesting how you ended up with a Neutral review as you said it was nothing the WG did that was wrong.

I found it honest in the way you rated it as the way you felt walking away.

I have done a few reviews on here and some may think that I have rated some WG's positive when by others standards they should be Neutral or Negative. But I have always tried to be true to my ethos that I rate a WG on how I felt walking away. If I felt that it was money well spent then its a positive.

Norwich is a bit outside my punting radius but I must say that if the chance came up I would book this one based on your review.

N

Modify to add.

Could someone remind me what YMMV stands for
« Last Edit: May 18, 2016, 11:55:24 pm by Neal69 »

Offline socks


Offline uutarn

Thanks for a vey interesting and honest review Uutarn.  :drinks:

I found it interesting how you ended up with a Neutral review as you said it was nothing the WG did that was wrong.

I found it honest in the way you rated it as the way you felt walking away.

I have done a few reviews on here and some may think that I have rated some WG's positive when by others standards they should be Neutral or Negative. But I have always tried to be true to my ethos that I rate a WG on how I felt walking away. If I felt that it was money well spent then its a positive.

Norwich is a bit outside my punting radius but I must say that if the chance came up I would book this one based on your review.

N

Modify to add.

Could someone remind me what YMMV stands for
Thanks mate.
I don't think there's one standard for reviews as it varies from punter to punter. Some will value the cost, where others will rate more on the looks of the WG. And there's so many variables to consider its hardly worth paying attention to the poss/neut/neg tag.
At the end of the day, just be honest and any punter worth his weight in salt will be able deduce what he likes/doesn't like if he reads the review in full/ask questions.

 :hi:

Offline PeteSmyth

Samantha has been on my hotlist for some time. The only reason I didn't see her this time in Norwich is because she's working out of some hotel in the middle of nowhere in NR5. After OP's experiences, I don't think I'll see her if she returns to the fine city.

Offline uutarn

Samantha has been on my hotlist for some time. The only reason I didn't see her this time in Norwich is because she's working out of some hotel in the middle of nowhere in NR5. After OP's experiences, I don't think I'll see her if she returns to the fine city.
Location of the hotel an issue?

Offline PeteSmyth

Yes, location of the hotel was an issue. If she'd used a central Norwich location - Carrow Road, Pottergate apartments, any of the hotels down Unthank Road - I'd have gladly seen her. I don't drive - getting to NR5 from the city centre is a real pain without a car.

Neal69

  • Guest

Offline uutarn

Yes, location of the hotel was an issue. If she'd used a central Norwich location - Carrow Road, Pottergate apartments, any of the hotels down Unthank Road - I'd have gladly seen her. I don't drive - getting to NR5 from the city centre is a real pain without a car.
I haven't got a car and its far from where i live so i hear ya.
But lo and behold there's this new business concept called... taxi's -.-

Offline Redwoodentransistor

Thanks for the review U...I've been mulling her over for a while, but think I'll give her the swerve based on your observations....though I like the sound of the squirting. Big girls don't really do it for me so think I'll look elsewhere.

As ever much appreciate your info

RWT

Offline uutarn

You're welcome and fair play.

She does everything labelled on the tin and does it well but understand your reluctance of course. Though squirting is a rarity in these parts so because of this i didn't feel it was a waste of money as it was a new experience. :hi: