Author Topic: NW Negative reviews  (Read 1484 times)

Offline Blackpool Rock

Just looking at the current NW review section and seems like a shed load of negatives up at the moment, surely the girls can't suddenly have got worse or are punters raising their expectations  :unknown:

Offline cueball

More members, more confidence in sharing, more popularity of ukp.

Imo

Offline MrMog

I think its more punters feeling confident enough to report a shit punt.

I know when I first started off I cared about my AW feedback so I could build up a good rep so some of the more choosy lasses would see me. Fortunately I saw some decent lasses and after a few punts I just gave up using the booking system anyhow as most girls will accept just a call or a text if you seem decent enough.

Now I don't give a shit as most of the feedback on AW that they have tends to be total bullshit. I take more note of seasoned punters feedback on here than I do of AW and so if I have a bad punt I have no issues telling everyone else so they can save some cash.If anything the more negatives that are on here then the better as it helps weed out the shit girls an in turn saves everyone a bit of money.

Offline MrMog

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only < here is one I don't recommend to anyone, total and utter shite in every sense of the word. No idea how the effin hell she has managed to get good feedback from punters in the past as my meeting with her was nothing short of pathetic.

We should do a hot list and a shit list of good and bad girls based on their reviews on here. Kind of a punters guide so to speak.

Offline blackburnian

Just looking at the current NW review section and seems like a shed load of negatives up at the moment, surely the girls can't suddenly have got worse or are punters raising their expectations  :unknown:

I'm about to add a neg and a neutral to help the stats :D

Cueball makes a good point , think my expectations have risen too.
Bb

Offline opal

Just looking at the current NW review section and seems like a shed load of negatives up at the moment, surely the girls can't suddenly have got worse or are punters raising their expectations  :unknown:

Its the proportion of negative to positive which has shown an increase in negatives and I dont think its because we have more members, its just a tempoary blip and like waiting for a bus to come along. We dont get any then 3 come along at once.

I think it has become far more commonplace to post negatives in general, though my thinking is that if we get a constant much higher number of negative reports compared to positve reports, were not enjoying ourselves and may as well all give up!
« Last Edit: March 20, 2017, 09:50:31 am by opal »

Offline NigelF

Its the proportion of negative to positive which has shown an increase in negatives and I dont think its because we have more members, its just a tempoary blip and like waiting for a bus to come along. We dont get any then 3 come along at once.

I think it has become far more commonplace to post negatives in general, though my thinking is that if we get a constant much higher number of negative reports compared to positve reports, were not enjoying ourselves and may as well all give up!

+1

I bumped a couple of old negative reviews, so that had small effect for example.

The negatives are the most important so the more the merrier as far as I'm concerned. Having said that I'm not overjoyed when people keep the good ones to themselves but ultimately it's up to them.

Offline Richthescouser

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only < here is one I don't recommend to anyone, total and utter shite in every sense of the word. No idea how the effin hell she has managed to get good feedback from punters in the past as my meeting with her was nothing short of pathetic.

We should do a hot list and a shit list of good and bad girls based on their reviews on here. Kind of a punters guide so to speak.

I notice she claims to be university educated.  Not any university i've been to, not an intelligent girl and not great service.  I saw her a long time before I joined here but would never go back.  if for no other reason than I like both tits on a girl to be similar in size :-)

Offline Laid_back_bloke

I've noticed that a once 30min punt that was £50, went to £60, now the bottom line seems to be the norm at £70.
Put simply I could have two 30min sessions for my £100 a month limit, & chances are that one would be better than the other. Now at £70, it's just the one session, & maybe a massage only somewhere else for £30-£40.

So at £70 I'm less prepared to accept a So-So session. I want proper value for my hard dosh. Why on AW I always try to get a proper booking. So I can leave feedback. I often refer to this site, & that I read & post reviews of who I see.

Hopefully the message will be. If you up your price, beset up you game too.  :thumbsup:


Offline opal

I've noticed that a once 30min punt that was £50, went to £60, now the bottom line seems to be the norm at £70.


If youre talking about adultwork £60/30min seems to be the starting point and mainly EE at that. Better AW girls probably £70/30min plus.

Manchester parlours probably still average £50/30min. and hasnt really changed much in a long time.


Offline MrMog

I've noticed prices seem to have gone up around £20 in most cases. Some have just took the piss and ramped their prices way higher than they are worth so they can fund their fake boob ops.

I set myself some limits a while back as I was spending far too much on punting, sadly far fewer girls are in my range now. We should #makepuntingcheapagain

Offline NW_Guy

North of Preston there seems to be a bit of a cartel going on between a couple of AW groups (CertifiedCute and OhhhsoInnoocent), with a standard set at £90 for 30min and £150 for 60min.  If we were talking 'perfect 10's, that's one thing, however there are a few ideally suited for Cueball's special recommendations amongst them...  Apart from the odd visiting indie and EE girls, it seems like a vfm punt is at least a 30-45 min drive from here... 

NWG
« Last Edit: March 20, 2017, 11:55:01 pm by NW_Guy »

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,692
  • Likes: 539
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
North of Preston there seems to be a bit of a cartel going on between a couple of AW groups (CertifiedCute and OhhhsoInnoocent), with a standard set at £90 for 30min and £150 for 60min.  If we were talking 'perfect 10's, that's one thing, however there are a few ideally suited for Cueball's special recommendations amongst them...  Apart from the odd visiting indie and EE girls, it seems like a vfm punt is at least a 30-45 min drive from here... 

NWG

I've looked at those girls and found nothing to excite. Just a bunch of junior blubsters. At one stage they tried to give the impression of being students, but that idea seems on the back burner now

Offline Blue1878

Have to agree on AW I tended to only report positive experiences to ensure nothing negative was reported against me and I tended to put my bad punts down to bad choice in my behalf. After switching to massage with HE I got out of the habit of leaving feedback given in the main you cant go far wrong with a massage unless girl not particularly attractive etc. The members on here so to give a more balanced view on WGs which is appreciated but I agree most British girls come with a higher price for a meet which is making me think longer and harder to part with my hard earned cash or gamble on a cheaper ER girl which is more hit than miss given the vanilla service that is usually on offer

Offline MrMog

A quick example would be this review, I was seriously considering seeing her until I checked here and found the negative posts.

External Link/Members Only

£120 saved.

She has loads of positive reviews and FR's on AW but to me none of them mean shit all, I found out all I needed to know on here.

Offline opal

on AW I tended to only report positive experiences to ensure nothing negative was reported against me and I tended to put my bad punts down to bad choice in my behalf.

Thats a very good point.

On AW the girls have a right to reply and punters dont want negative comments which can lead to a bias towards positive for the reasons you state.
Conversley on here there isnt the same right to reply for WGs which could possibly lead to a negative bias and explain the flurry of negative reviews on here.

Offline Dreamweaver1

Thats a very good point.

On AW the girls have a right to reply and punters dont want negative comments which can lead to a bias towards positive for the reasons you state.
Conversley on here there isnt the same right to reply for WGs which could possibly lead to a negative bias and explain the flurry of negative reviews on here.

But hasn't that always been the case. Why would it suddenly start the flurry of negatives now?

Offline opal

But hasn't that always been the case. Why would it suddenly start the flurry of negatives now?

Yes thats also true.

Maybe theres a trend towards negative reviews.

For example the negative review below where the poster even says he would see her again if she'd have him. A review either positive or negative can be a matter of opinion and could be through no fault of the girl or through lack of research from the punter.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=132061.0

Offline Scotpunter

Yes thats also true.

Maybe theres a trend towards negative reviews.

For example the negative review below where the poster even says he would see her again if she'd have him. A review either positive or negative can be a matter of opinion and could be through no fault of the girl or through lack of research from the punter.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=132061.0

I think most of us can read between the lines when reviews like that are left. That does seem a rather unfair negative to my mind.
Banned reason: Cunt
Banned by: daviemac