Janet joy - too good to be true?

[che_666999]

External Link/Members Only

Pornstar (google her) offering a lot of services for £95.
Most photos seem like they are flame from other site but the selfie does make me wonder.

What do you think?

[Jay-Jay]

I'm sure she has reports on here that I've seen........why would they not be showing up ?

Jay

[threechilliman]

Profile looks iffy to me. Price, phone pics and calls herself mixed Indian. Emmmmm.....


tcm

[bash_eer]

It is the the girl you see in the porn videos if you search on line,I saw over a year ago when she was working in Wembley. She is a clock watcher and has cum twice limit and because I didn't came twice from her giving me a BJ I didnt actually get have sex even though we had plenty time in the hour meet. Only positive is that she gave me one of the best blowjobs I ever had in true porn star style with my cum all over her face on the first pop and in her mouth the second pop.

[lcb]

External Link/Members Only

[SamLP]

Not sure if it's her or someone cashing in on a pg scam.

Her old profile has some reviews, and she was exposed for agreeing to do BB for extra. May explain why the old profile is gone.
External Link/Members Only

[tonysoprano]

That's probably a fake profile but her and the very beautiful Penelope Ferre used to work in London occasionally. Worth seeing if you get a chance..

[Sonny Crockett]

An "Indian mixed" Hungarian girl.... That's just bollocks!!!

Most likely a fake profile.

[cueball]

mixed Indian.

That'll be curry and chips then

[getonit]

The 'real' janet joy has to be nearly 30 , this profile states 20!  Surely is to good to be true OP.

[smiths]

Not sure if it's her or someone cashing in on a pg scam.

Her old profile has some reviews, and she was exposed for agreeing to do BB for extra. May explain why the old profile is gone.
External Link/Members Only

In her last linked in review the punter says she did anal bareback with him, I punted with her before he did the review and she was good in my view, I wouldn't touch her with a bargepole now knowing she offers BB to any Tom, Dick or Abdul.

[kundalini]

I'm sure she has reports on here that I've seen........why would they not be showing up ?

Jay

Because in 2014 her AW profile was done for her by Melanie's friends group. At the end of 2014 she stopped being represented by them and got a new AW profile, indeed she has gone through several profiles in 2015. If you put 2400634 in the search here, her old reports will appear. More reports under 2945479. May be others too (can't remember quite how many profiles she has had)

Profile looks iffy to me. Price, phone pics and calls herself mixed Indian. Emmmmm.....

tcm

Janet's english isn't good enough to create her own AW profile. Her choice of assistance in 2015 has been awful. Her various 2015 AW profiles have been full of errors. Typically they quote a low basic price but not the price of extras.

The 'real' janet joy has to be nearly 30 , this profile states 20!  Surely is to good to be true OP.

First part is true. Personally I suspect it is a deliberate error on the part of whoever did the profile.

I saw Janet twice in 2014 in Manchester. Joint best escort I've seen. Long report on here for the first encounter.

The real reason I think it is likely to be Janet, is that in 2015 she has tended to work with her sister. Both of them have got through several profiles in 2015. Typically they rotate between London and Liverpool with occasional trips to Glasgow. When I checked earlier this month, Janet's sister also had a new profile with the same location as Janet.

In her last linked in review the punter says she did anal bareback with him, I punted with her before he did the review and she was good in my view, I wouldn't touch her with a bargepole now knowing she offers BB to any Tom, Dick or Abdul.

Surely you mean anyone who offers her £1000 and test results (important aspects, if the report is to be believed) ?

[smiths]

Because in 2014 her AW profile was done for her by Melanie's friends group. At the end of 2014 she stopped being represented by them and got a new AW profile, indeed she has gone through several profiles in 2015. If you put 2400634 in the search here, her old reports will appear. More reports under 2945479. May be others too (can't remember quite how many profiles she has had)

Janet's english isn't good enough to create her own AW profile. Her choice of assistance in 2015 has been awful. Her various 2015 AW profiles have been full of errors. Typically they quote a low basic price but not the price of extras.

First part is true. Personally I suspect it is a deliberate error on the part of whoever did the profile.

I saw Janet twice in 2014 in Manchester. Joint best escort I've seen. Long report on here for the first encounter.

The real reason I think it is likely to be Janet, is that in 2015 she has tended to work with her sister. Both of them have got through several profiles in 2015. Typically they rotate between London and Liverpool with occasional trips to Glasgow. When I checked earlier this month, Janet's sister also had a new profile with the same location as Janet.

Surely you mean anyone who offers her £1000 and test results (if the report is to be believed) ?

That punter said he paid £1k but if true that doesn't mean she hasn't offered it for less and anyway that's irrelevant to me as she has proved herself to be a dirty skank in my view so one to avoid. The review is still up of course plus the punter has done more since so I have no reason to doubt his word. Very simple for me, if I hear a WG has offered BB I avoid them. Tests are only any good when they are done, from that point onwards the WG and punter could of done anything with anyone so not something I see as proof.

[kundalini]

That punter said he paid £1k but if true that doesn't mean she hasn't offered it for less and anyway that's irrelevant to me as she has proved herself to be a dirty skank in my view so one to avoid. The review is still up of course plus the punter has done more since so I have no reason to doubt his word. Very simple for me, if I hear a WG has offered BB I avoid them. Tests are only any good when they are done, from that point onwards the WG and punter could of done anything with anyone so not something I see as proof.

Each of us has to decide what level of risk we are comfortable with. Janet was clearly high risk even before her notorious report, as there are plenty of vids online showing her doing DP, anal creampie etc. Personally, I don't see the report as adding much additional risk.

[smiths]

Each of us has to decide what level of risk we are comfortable with. Janet was clearly high risk even before her notorious report, as there are plenty of vids online showing her doing DP, anal creampie etc. Personally, I don't see the report as adding much additional risk.

Indeed we do and she is too high risk for me now I know this info. This was with a punter though, the idea with porn is the actors get tested on a regular basis or they don't get the work, that might not happen outside porn and I wouldn't be believing it does. So for ME once I knew she offered BB too a punter my interest in her was over. As it happens she was only in an area good for me for a short period anyway.

As you say you don't see the report adding much additional risk, so I assume it adds some additional risk in your view, to me its too much for my liking however small it is.

[Kaluuu276]

Although porn actors get tested they also play around when not working.

Is it not correct that you need to abstain from unprotected sex/oral for 3 months to properly test for all sexual illnesses, including HIV etc

[Celticstu]

Ive seen her twice. 100% genuine. First time was better than the second
Wouldn't hesitate to see her again. She's sexy but not the most talkative. Her prices have dropped in the last 2 years. Not sure why

[che_666999]

Feedback is hidden now, I suspect this is a scammer using the real ladies pics and details

[claretandblue]

In her last linked in review the punter says she did anal bareback with him, I punted with her before he did the review and she was good in my view, I wouldn't touch her with a bargepole now knowing she offers BB to any Tom, Dick or Abdul.

Agreed, that review is still one of the most startling ones I have read, to cap it all from a married punter who regularly shags his missus

[HappyandLucky]

Shame about the BB,  so have removed from my HL.

[Randy James]

this profile likely made for her
the mixed indian stuff is a technique used by asian landlords/pimps etc to broaden her client interest from asian guys.

[Bud$]

It's probably her - did some research on here and the other site to gauge opinions of punters. I phoned her as well, she sounded genuinely E. Euro - thing is her prices are correct BUT she wants you to get there first then she'll add on the extras. She's still cheaper than other porn stars, but IMHO not worth going to see.