Ok, tho I have better things to do wiv my time, here's an explanation:
The Background:
-There's a Review from a Newbie, doesn't fill in all the usual details, he gets Flak for that.Its a TOFTT.
- I like what I see. But he has reported some negatives. Questions asked, not answered.
- I get the chance, make appointment, check her out, get bad vibes, Walk! Report this on here with a spot more detail on the WG & Location.
Issue:
- Response from Marmalade as you'll see above.
I've no idea why anyone would take seriously a woman who calls herself a teen when even the profile states she's in her twenties.
- as someone else stated privately to me, " I notice smarmalades been all over your shit .... Wee sly digs etc"
- ....and yes, That was exactly how I saw it too, so i Responded, think this may not have been as clear as it might have been. The inference is that because the WG has "teen" in her Profile name, and a clear age 22 is stated, that I am some kind of idiot to even bother checking her out?
Translation/Explanation of my Response:
Para 1. I basically reply to Marmalade that I don't see his comment as bearing any relevance. (its just a personal insult, doesn't add anything constructive to the thread, he "hasn't a clue" as he stated, I agreed.
Para 2. I selected as an example, a WG I saw recently who used the word (Handjob) "Queen" in her Profile title. I then recounted detail of the visit where she "proved" to me that she was a member of a Royal Family.
Para 3. I selected as an example, another girl who used to be "the Blowjob Queen" but has recently changed her name. I detailed how I had "outed" her as a cheat and an imposter, as she has No Royal Background, and that she has now changed her name to"BJQ"
Now Paras 2 and 3 above were I confess a fabrication (sorry Mandy, it means, "I made it up", clear?) - the point I was making to Marmalade was simply that someone may use a Word in their profile title which is not 100% an accurate representation, Its just a Profile Title!
Para 4, I'm guessing by now, you'll have worked out that I've clarified to Marmalade that his chosen title indeed doesn't represent him accurately either
.... I do occasionally appreciate sarcasm, but perhaps there was too much link following required for the lazy, or to get my drift, or maybe the questioners don't share my sense of humour. I actually thought Marmalade was bluffing when he responded that he didn't understand. If its still no clear to anybody, please PM me for a pictureboard.
Anyhow, apologies to anybody else who thinks its important - I hope the explanation above enlightens anybody who gives a toss.
Main reason for bothering is to close off a point on a different thread which I don't want to hijack, so this post belongs here.
Now can we please just get on wiv shaggin burds and writing all about it?
