Author Topic: Passionate Lilly - Bizarre cancellation - Kings Cross  (Read 4243 times)


24 review(s) for PASSIONATE Lilly xx (18 positive, 0 neutral, 6 negative) [Indexed by ]
27 review(s) for _Seductive Marika_ (20 positive, 0 neutral, 7 negative) [Indexed by tomato sauce and waffles]

mangboh

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
My first posting and it's a negative one  :dash:. Met Lilly in the past which she provided good service as listed on her enjoys list. But never experienced anything like today.

Booking was confirmed this morning via text messages to meet in the early afternoon. I rang her bell twice at the agreed time, but she didn't open her door. Sent her text messages confirming I have arrived and asking if the booking was cancelled. No reply initially, but ended up in her room about 15min later after she asked me to ring her flat.

She strangely asked how long I would stay once I was in her room as all were confirmed by text for one hour. Her reply was that she could only do half hour which was strange. She then changed her mind, apologised and asked me to leave. I was shocked and disappointed but didn't argue with her. So I just walked without knowing why the booking was cancelled. A few things gone through my mind on the way out. I was clean and courteous as usual and we were on good terms the last we met a few weeks ago. So why??? She should have just said no before confirming without being a time waster :thumbsdown:.

External Link/Members Only

TT115

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I dont know mate, maybe you should of just came out and asked her what was wrong then you would have gotten a answer the answer might be the truth or might have been a lie but at least it would have been an answer instead of trying to guess the reason why

TT115

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
forget about it I have just read previous reviews and the building is a brothel with several WGs inside ran by a single pimp/maid who takes bookings literally back to back

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
That's just appalling service, the service standards have deteriorated drastically over the years.

Unacceptable   :thumbsdown:

mrhappypants

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Beware first post reviews.   Nobody is going to suggest that Swin*** Street is anything other than a "McDonalds" brothel, but I have visited, continue to visit and have seen a number of fantastic providers (as well as some crap ones).   The OP sounds like a wierdo.

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
This girl is clearly mentally unstable, I had a couple of good meets with her, then she bizarrely cancelled on me after letting me get as far as her room. No explanation, she just decides on a whim that you are persona non grata for some reason.  :wackogirl:

Offline puntingpumping1920

Beware first post reviews.   Nobody is going to suggest that Swin*** Street is anything other than a "McDonalds" brothel, but I have visited, continue to visit and have seen a number of fantastic providers (as well as some crap ones).   The OP sounds like a wierdo.

 
Why does OP sound like a weirdo...is it because of your experience there
Banned reason: Mr £500k go and buy some fucking manners
Banned by: Iloveoral

Himeros

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Manobho how many times had you seen her before she did this?

Himeros

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
This girl is clearly mentally unstable, I had a couple of good meets with her, then she bizarrely cancelled on me after letting me get as far as her room. No explanation, she just decides on a whim that you are persona non grata for some reason.  :wackogirl:

Same question to you VT how many times did you see her before your last encounter? I was contemplating seeing her this or next week

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Same question to you VT how many times did you see her before your last encounter? I was contemplating seeing her this or next week

I think it was twice, then the third time she went all funny on me.  :wackogirl:

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
Beware first post reviews.   Nobody is going to suggest that Swin*** Street is anything other than a "McDonalds" brothel, but I have visited, continue to visit and have seen a number of fantastic providers (as well as some crap ones).   The OP sounds like a wierdo.

There is another flat nearby on another street. Do you know if this WG definitely operates here?

Cheers

Sorry to hear Mangboh...



Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: August 15, 2017, 07:07:17 am by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

mrhappypants

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Why does OP sound like a weirdo...is it because of your experience there

I saw her 6 months ago and was underwhelmed.   My comment is based rather on the OP's bona fides; first post, first review and describing someone as wierd.  There are plenty of fruit loops out there, both punters and WG, so best sometimes not to take stuff at face value.

mangboh

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
TT115, I didn't ask because I didn't think I will get an answer.

Mrhappypants, I have seen many other different SPs including those at HODs but have got no problem at all. I am a regular reader of UKP, benefitted a lot from feedbacks by others; good or bad. Always wanted to review but haven't done so till now.

Himeros, yesterday was the 5th.

I am not bitter. Just need to treat the whole thing as a bad experience and move on.

bigmanbigman

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest

Red_baron

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I've seen her a number of times and never had a problem.

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I've seen her a number of times and never had a problem.

Your time may come!  :bomb:

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
I've seen her a number of times and never had a problem.

Well we would have considered  to give your comment some credit, if you had ever bothered to review your number of so called visits.

Right now, no one gives a flying f**k.

Offline KPL

My first posting and it's a negative one  :dash:. Met Lilly in the past which she provided good service as listed on her enjoys list. But never experienced anything like today.

Booking was confirmed this morning via text messages to meet in the early afternoon. I rang her bell twice at the agreed time, but she didn't open her door. Sent her text messages confirming I have arrived and asking if the booking was cancelled. No reply initially, but ended up in her room about 15min later after she asked me to ring her flat.

She strangely asked how long I would stay once I was in her room as all were confirmed by text for one hour. Her reply was that she could only do half hour which was strange. She then changed her mind, apologised and asked me to leave. I was shocked and disappointed but didn't argue with her. So I just walked without knowing why the booking was cancelled. A few things gone through my mind on the way out. I was clean and courteous as usual and we were on good terms the last we met a few weeks ago. So why??? She should have just said no before confirming without being a time waster :thumbsdown:.

External Link/Members Only

Another victim by this psycho  :wackogirl: :crazy: :wacko: :crazy:  Dont know why OPs keep booking her

ptokazii

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
is this really the reason for the negative ?
She received u 5 times before, you didn't repay her for the good times but she makes some mistake and wham! U punish her !
She/the maid probably overbooked that's all.

I'm not saying this behaviour is not inconvenient for a punter, as I have been left disappointed terribly once or twice before, regardless of the reason.

I must now second the weirdo classification.

Seriously, there should be more types of negative reviews as this most likely qualifies as a tiny insignificant harmless negative whereas a standoff with a sergei like I've had twice would come as the more serious type. It's not fair either to other punters who search for a chick and notice she has 4 negs don't check what kind of negs they are and continue searching, as it so often happens to me.

vt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
is this really the reason for the negative ?
She received u 5 times before, you didn't repay her for the good times but she makes some mistake and wham! U punish her !
She/the maid probably overbooked that's all.

I'm not saying this behaviour is not inconvenient for a punter, as I have been left disappointed terribly once or twice before, regardless of the reason.

I must now second the weirdo classification.

Seriously, there should be more types of negative reviews as this most likely qualifies as a tiny insignificant harmless negative whereas a standoff with a sergei like I've had twice would come as the more serious type. It's not fair either to other punters who search for a chick and notice she has 4 negs don't check what kind of negs they are and continue searching, as it so often happens to me.

She keeps doing this to guys, she did it to me and another guy who commented on my review of her and now the OP, who knows how many others who aren't members here.

A lot of it is to do with the set-up there, they'll do back-to-back bookings if they can and there's no maid onsite to handle the traffic. When it all gets too much for Lilly, she flips out.

Deserved negative & warning of what can happen there in my opinion.


Offline Cunning Punt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,621
  • Likes: 28
  •  
  • Reviews: 195
is this really the reason for the negative ?
She received u 5 times before, you didn't repay her for the good times but she makes some mistake and wham! U punish her !
She/the maid probably overbooked that's all.

I'm not saying this behaviour is not inconvenient for a punter, as I have been left disappointed terribly once or twice before, regardless of the reason.

I must now second the weirdo classification.

Seriously, there should be more types of negative reviews as this most likely qualifies as a tiny insignificant harmless negative whereas a standoff with a sergei like I've had twice would come as the more serious type. It's not fair either to other punters who search for a chick and notice she has 4 negs don't check what kind of negs they are and continue searching, as it so often happens to me.

What are you on about?  :unknown:

It would be far too complicated to having different shades of negative as you suggest and even the award of different shades would still be subjective.

In any case, this is clearly a justified negative: She not only ignored him and kept him waiting for 15mins, she then tried to cut the agreed time before chucking him out! So a totally wasted journey.

By luck, if he lived nearby and/or managed to line up a Plan B is totally irrelevant. Many of us travel at least an hour each way for a punt and aren't impressed when an escort fails to go through with a booking at the last minute.

Therefore, this negative review is extremely useful to us and that is the whole point of this site - to save punters time and money.
And, what's more, the comment has been backed up by other punters.

Saying it's a "tiny insignificant harmless negative" makes you sound like her pimp or, at best, a whiteknight.  :thumbsdown:

Thanks for the review, OP.
« Last Edit: August 23, 2017, 10:00:05 pm by Cunning Punt »

Offline cunningman

It would be far too complicated to having different shades of negative as you suggest and even the award of different shades would still be subjective.

I'm not with you on this.  I'd really prefer a distinction between neg because 'shit service' and neg because 'did not meet'.  I know issues happen etc etc and some girls have moaned in post-coital about no-shows at a rate I would not have expected, frankly.  I can't really blame overbooking under the circumstances, however annoying it is at the time - but you have your cash and can move to plan b.  To be honest I take a B&S also if I fancy the girl and the negotiation is OK - I don't think the rule that its about a girl rather than an operation is entirely reflecting the reality, at least not in London.   If there's a couple of cute girls and there's an overrun and I'm offered the other, then I'd regard that as a different thing to an ugly old munter hiding behind some pics Sergei nicked.  Both technically B&S but if I fancy her and the service is good - what's not to like?  Bird in the hand etc.

Offline Cunning Punt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,621
  • Likes: 28
  •  
  • Reviews: 195
I'm not with you on this.  I'd really prefer a distinction between neg because 'shit service' and neg because 'did not meet'.  I know issues happen etc etc and some girls have moaned in post-coital about no-shows at a rate I would not have expected, frankly.  I can't really blame overbooking under the circumstances, however annoying it is at the time - but you have your cash and can move to plan b.  To be honest I take a B&S also if I fancy the girl and the negotiation is OK - I don't think the rule that its about a girl rather than an operation is entirely reflecting the reality, at least not in London.   If there's a couple of cute girls and there's an overrun and I'm offered the other, then I'd regard that as a different thing to an ugly old munter hiding behind some pics Sergei nicked.  Both technically B&S but if I fancy her and the service is good - what's not to like?  Bird in the hand etc.

I take it you obviously haven't had a lot of your time wasted. Well, I can assure that many of us have.

I was considering booking this escort but if I'd spent 3hrs of my life on a wasted round-trip to see her only for her refuse to see me, then she would have got a negative - and deservedly so. A negative is a useful warning others not to see an escort - for whatever reason.

Whether it's a maid doing the comms or a maid is irrelevant - the effect is still the same, time is still wasted and it is likely to happen to others, hence the warnings via a negative review.

You make it sound simple just to book another suitable escort at short notice - well it isn't always. I guess that, again, you've been very lucky. It doesn't always slot into place.

Anyway, if you're not happy with the rating system, then why not make a suggestion to Admin? :rolleyes:

Online Icarus

If events happened as OP described, it is a deserved negative in my book. Time wasting & shit service both have their place in the negative corner. There is a previous review with very similar (although more physical) ending. That said agree with scepticism regarding OP.

I saw Lilly again since my last review. There are positives... I'm mega attracted to her and think shes fit, kisses well and provides great OWO. Negatives too... she still knows no English so it feels more p&d rather than GFE, and probable timing/wasting issues.

@OP post reviews and people would have taken this more seriously

bigmanbigman

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Just dont be lazy and read all of the reviews its that simple

Offline bediscrete

It's a justified negative imo.
Meet was booked/confirmed and she (or whoever) fucked the OP over.
Was on my HL but not anymore - have limited enough opportunities to have my time wasted.

InstaPunt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Beware first post reviews.   Nobody is going to suggest that Swin*** Street is anything other than a "McDonalds" brothel, but I have visited, continue to visit and have seen a number of fantastic providers (as well as some crap ones).   The OP sounds like a wierdo.
Everyone starts somewhere, nothing about the OP seems off, honestly id suggest beware of white knighting in all its forms overt and covert , i.e randomly discrediting an op whose neg has clearly pissed off a few people on here.