Prossies should still be scrutinised for their lack of ethics the same as any other occupation.
Agreed and UKP plays a big part in assisting that scrutinisation through reviews.
What a WG or any other business person may indirectly say about a customer or client after they have left, should be scrutinised based on what exactly? Hearsay? Some form of unwritten ethical code? Or do we take the freedom of speech stance that people can say what the fuck they want, as long as it doesn't cross the boundaries of discrimination under the Equality Act?
If I had a customer who stinks and was boring as fuck, but he was coming to my shop every week to buy something, would I tell him to stop coming? Probably not. Would I tell someone else at work about him after he left? Probably yes. I don't think that is a lack of ethics, its just not denigrating someone to their face.
Most WG complaints I read about are related to basic human ideals, of hygiene, respect and morals. If every punter followed those ideals, there would be very little left to complain about.
How fucking difficult is punting?
1. Find a WG
2. Agree a price, date, time, location and list of services.
3. Arrive on time and clean.
4. Re-confirm services and hand over the money.
5. Treat her like a human being with respect.
6. Fuck her
7. Get dressed and fuck off.