Milena Diamonds of Newcastle.

[toon972]

External Link/Members Only
Ok I know I should have known EE stay clear.Her pics looked good though,size 10,chiselled features,toned body.Not the case though,size 10 yes but not chiselled features or toned body.Not that her body is bad,just not what is advertised and not pretty.Booked for an hour,but she thought I had booked for half hour.So I agreed with her and paid for that,result.Another thing she kept on calling me "dahling".my pet hate!
       She was only wearing a towel and took this off and lay on bed with me.Do not know about kissing as I never tried,so I asked for oral and she obliged.Tbf she was keen and was ok with a bit sloppiness thrown in.Did not do any ro and she put condom on and did mish and doggie,fair enough.She does not do cim,so finished off with a wank and I was pleased to get away.
.      To sum up,she is quite friendly and keen but not the girl advertised and not that pretty.Big breasts yeh,but not that firm.

[AnthG]

Booked for an hour,but she thought I had booked for half hour.So I agreed with her and paid for that,result.

Thanks for the review toon.

As you know, that is exactly what happened to me too that caused all my problems. This idiot managing the bookings for Diamonds really needs to get their ruddy act together! 

[toon972]

Cheers Anth.

[johnny34]

Thanks for the review thanks toon.

The pics do look good. Are the pics not of her or are they heavily photoshopped?

[toon972]

Thanks Johnny,yeh they look heavily photo-shopped.Maybe I should have walked but I wanted to know what her likes were to maybe redeem herself,did not work out.

[johnny34]

Thanks Johnny,yeh they look heavily photo-shopped.Maybe I should have walked but I wanted to know what her likes were to maybe redeem herself,did not work out.

Thanks, at least you managed to save yourself £50 getting out after 30mins.

Diamonds really do need to do something about the numpty on the phones.

[sentinel]

Is it not obvious that the photos are heavily photo-shopped and in fact the body and head are of two entirely different girls and have been blended together by some amateur using little more than a lap-top and Microsoft Windows.

Don't say you weren't warned, there's even a non-complimentary review from a Jeff on Diamonds' very own site- most unusual of them to let that one slip through.   

[toon972]

When I returned home and had a look at pics,yes they looked wrong.Same as what you have done.That feedback was  not on diamonds website when I booked her.

[greychap]

EE most of the time means disaster and there an EE from Diamonds double Disaster

Least you managed to just go for the half hour so there fuck up was appreciated on that day

[Toshiba]

hmmmm, yes the warning signs are all there, unrealistic pics, EE , Diamonds.

apart from the time fuck up which was not this girls fault what did she do wrong?

am i the only one thinking this AGAIN  should be a negative against the agency more than anything?

not taking away from the fact that this is your review mate and you saw it as a negative ok 

[FLYING BLUE]

External Link/Members Only
Ok I know I should have known EE stay clear.Her pics looked good though,size 10,chiselled features,toned body.Not the case though,size 10 yes but not chiselled features or toned body.Not that her body is bad,just not what is advertised and not pretty.Booked for an hour,but she thought I had booked for half hour.So I agreed with her and paid for that,result.Another thing she kept on calling me "dahling".my pet hate!
       She was only wearing a towel and took this off and lay on bed with me.Do not know about kissing as I never tried,so I asked for oral and she obliged.Tbf she was keen and was ok with a bit sloppiness thrown in.Did not do any ro and she put condom on and did mish and doggie,fair enough.She does not do cim,so finished off with a wank and I was pleased to get away.
.      To sum up,she is quite friendly and keen but not the girl advertised and not that pretty.Big breasts yeh,but not that firm.

Is it just me OR does the link to this girl (above) - not work?
Sorry you had a shitty time by the way

[daviemac]

Is it just me OR does the link to this girl (above) - not work?
Sorry you had a shitty time by the way

You're right it doesn't work try this one -

External Link/Members Only

[toon972]

My apologies for link,maybe it is because I am on phone.

[portable]

Thanks for the review, I've been tempted to see her, but had a feeling she wouldn't be all that great. Lucky she thought you where only there half an hour, that was a blessing in disguise.

Seems like Diamonds specialise in hiring girls who used to be stunning and presumably enjoyed the work, having london agency style photo sets... from five-ten years ago.

[toon972]

Cheers Portable.Seeing her in towel reminded me of the mrs.

[AnthG]

am i the only one thinking this AGAIN  should be a negative against the agency more than anything?

Can I ask Toon, have you possibly dropped a complaint to Diamonds about this

Booked for an hour,but she thought I had booked for half hour.

Which really, if it had of been the case of you liking the girl and wanting your full time booked, it would have been pretty poor service them telling her it was only 30mins..

I ask as to be honest, I am curious if they respond to you and your complaint, as the gits are totally ignoring me and mine.

And this is pretty unforgiving as I bet they will have had someone else booked with her 45mins after you entered the door. Which if you had of wanted your full 1hr that other punter may have come knocking on her door with you still there.

[toon972]

No Anth I have not.This happened about 4 weeks ago.She told me she was going to London the week after so I held back with the review.She is still there hence the review now.