Sarah's latest feedback is questionable. Actually its blatently obvious.
No feedback since Oct 2014 and then on 03 Jan 2015 she gets a positive from Colonel Mustard which is over a year after she left him feedback and he has had no feedback since then but leaves her one a year later? Strange.
Not that strange - they left each other mutual feedback last year, now it just looks like he's seen her again, left her feedback and she hasn't yet reciprocated. Could be legit although fully accept Colonel Mustard's punting habits are a bit odd - only ever given 5 feedback and only to three girls, one of whom's profile is inactive. So this could be a pimp profile used every now and then to boost ratings but it's odd to see one stretching back five or six years like this.
But why bother when she has over 100 positive fb?
Then she gets another feedback from nicolb two days later on 05 Jan 2015 but she hasn't logged into AW since before Christmas and hasn't read my message sent a few weeks ago so I would guess that feedback is fake too.
I know she has been reviewed on here, but don't understand why there is a need to boost feedback with fake ones.
Put me off seeing her.
Nicolb has a similarly stretched out fb profile - given 8 positives since 2006 so hardly prolific but usually with very well rated WG's who clearly don't need the fb boost.
At the end of the day if there is fb manipulation going on it's definitely a pimp as the writing in the field reports is far too perfect English to be Sarah's - you can see from the fb she gives it's not the same person writing.
As always, I would rely on the reviews here. I don't see the above as particularly suspect, worst case it's just an over-enthusiastic pimp.
