Alicia345, London Gangland – Adultwork Notes, UK Punting and The Police. Yikes!

[Horizontal pleasures]

Perhaps you and west8 should meet up and spout shit at each other 

Quote from: giamanto on Yesterday at 03:47:15 pm
I am black and i am a self made multi millionaire

Perhaps you and west8 and James999 should meet up and spout shit at each other 

[Yorkle]

I'm still interested in what "London Gangland" in the title refers to.....!

[JuliusSeizure]

I'm still interested in what "London Gangland" in the title refers to.....!

Nothing, he is using it as a slur to associate her as some sort of criminal background and defame her. His just being melodramatic as usual.

[west8]

'London Gangland'. Here's my take. I wrote from day one that I found Alicia 'Odd' and 'Threatening'. Her stalker like behaviour over the past few days has reinforced that opinion. It's a little odd that a single punter on this forum claims to have met her, yet that same individual drew precisely the same conclusion.

So, I have two possible explanations. Either we're both right or we both misunderstood Alicia. Only you punters can decide that by meeting her and paying your money. Then you can come back here and tell us I was wrong and that Alicia is wonderful, or that she is indeed a headcase.

For what it's worth, my initial thought was that she isn't an escort at all, but perhaps a psychology or sociology student doing this as 'research'. Or perhaps her boyfriend fancied some new wheels for his Vauxhall Viva. That's not my business, but 'gangland' in the context above refers to the repetitive Groundhog Day experience of twice attempting to arrange a meet with Alicia - and her decision to cancel twice. Anyone who used to play Gangland as a kid will know just how that felt!

I don't know that he brings activity to the site. I know I post less because people like him have started appearing here.

Come on SS, be serious. Each and every one of us invariably disagree with the views or reviews of other members, but to say you refrain from posting as often as you once did makes you sound like a right sulker. We have had plenty of disagreements in the past, but onwards and upwards. If I dislike the style or tone of certain posters here, I just skip. It's pointless sitting at home and seething with frustration like Cornish Sub and Nightkid. Life really is too short to get SO involved in the 'politics' of an internet forum. This is supposed to be fun, but some clearly take it far too seriously.

Not really, he actually raises a legit point considering how much the wanker goes on about being a family man.

Without going into other bullshit you've spouted, you claim to be a "family man" yet we end up hearing about you out at a club at 3 a.m. ... I suppose you brought your wife and kids there too?

You do seem to have an unhealthy fascination with my domestic arrangements. You would know if you had bothered to read my reply to another thread that the past week was half term. You'd also know the past week was half term as I daresay your mother has been busy preparing your school uniform for tomorrow morning.

Don't forget your apple young man.

[iPad3]

Westie I must say I really do think your a bit of a cock but fair play to you re your comments about people moving on if they don't like what you post. It seems you are the proverbial forum dog shit though and the flies just can't keep away ( I don't mean to be rude chaps I know your not flys but....)

Not sure why but people keep on feeding the troll!!!

[Herges Adventures]

Thanks for clearing up why the term 'Gangland' appears in a UKP review W8 - of course, a child's game... and there was me thinking it was just an extended character assassination attempt of a w/g who has 'wronged' you.

Good to hear also that you have never looked down on anyone, as that 'homeless cunt' from a while ago will now doubt attest to. 
 

[NightKid]

You do seem to have an unhealthy fascination with my domestic arrangements. You would know if you had bothered to read my reply to another thread that the past week was half term. You'd also know the past week was half term as I daresay your mother has been busy preparing your school uniform for tomorrow morning.

Don't forget your apple young man.

Bzzt, wrong again on both counts.

I have an interest in your inconsistent cock stories, and considering how much my observations seem to make you squirm while you avoid the question, I'd say it's pretty healthy (since it makes me "seething" with happiness.  )
Also, how the flying fuck does going clubbing until morning during half term make someone any better of a "family man"?    Assuming you're even a real father in the first place.

You're losing your touch at deflecting, old-timer. 

[fuddle]

@giamanto -
I shall not get involved in the wider argument, but a reply to what you have said earlier about me / how escorting works
In order to get regular clients, personality is key, failing that- amazing in bed. I would say if you have to rank the personality, the sex, and looks- looks are least important (an average looking girl with great attitude/personality and mind blowing in bed, will be more successful than a very attractive girl who isn't great at sex and has no social skills. With no disrespect intended, many girls who are well reviewed on here prove this theory- girl next door types getting consistent amazing feedback and booked weeks in advance, whilst model types who only look good, struggle for work). People think this is a shallow industry- but actually most guys are very forgiving when it comes to looks, if you are a nice girl and really good at what you do. You can be the hottest woman on the planet- and a poor escort. If you are not easy to be around and aren't good in bed- what justifies the rate? I have worked as an unsuccessful lap dancer but a successful escort (and seen many hot girls come and go, and many less attractive ones make it)- the biggest mistake that someone can make is to think that being looking good is all you need. It is enough for you maybe, Giamanto, but not for most clients paying the higher price bracket. You left an earlier review where you mention nothing at all about service, attitude or personality, so looks may be the only priority for you, but you are in the minority. The majority of clients are not that easily pleased. Even the most shy guys or those who spend lots of social time still appreciate a bit of personality and a decent BJ.

Looks are subjective; some clients like small boobs, petite girls, BBW, whatever. You seem to be a "boob man", so can confidently say a girl who's face you've never seen is the hottest girl in London, whilst west8 and Fugly are a little less enthusiastic. So it varies from person to person. Some guys will think one look is perfect, and others wouldn't like it at all. If a WG is not very into sex, and doesn't have a good personality then she will eventually struggle- or start to attract the wrong type of client. A great rack will get a guy through the door and create a good first impression- but if you under deliver on everything else, he will not come back and you will have to get new people all the time. The top ladies in this industry are of course blessed with good looks- but are rarely the "most" attractive, and anyone who actually wants a fun time is usually too discerning to pay top dollar for looks alone. The factors you are basing someone's potential success on are inaccurate. You seem to think a woman can be really attractive but bad at timekeeping, bad in bed, and poor at communication and earn "300k a year" (25k a month- to do this she would need four clients every single day, 365 days a year at £200p/hr). This is a ridiculous notion.
Bree x

I've now decided that I like Bree rather a lot. Erudite, perceptive, educated. Phwoar.

[DOBERMAN]

@giamanto -
I shall not get involved in the wider argument, but a reply to what you have said earlier about me / how escorting works
In order to get regular clients, personality is key, failing that- amazing in bed. I would say if you have to rank the personality, the sex, and looks- looks are least important (an average looking girl with great attitude/personality and mind blowing in bed, will be more successful than a very attractive girl who isn't great at sex and has no social skills. With no disrespect intended, many girls who are well reviewed on here prove this theory- girl next door types getting consistent amazing feedback and booked weeks in advance, whilst model types who only look good, struggle for work). People think this is a shallow industry- but actually most guys are very forgiving when it comes to looks, if you are a nice girl and really good at what you do. You can be the hottest woman on the planet- and a poor escort. If you are not easy to be around and aren't good in bed- what justifies the rate? I have worked as an unsuccessful lap dancer but a successful escort (and seen many hot girls come and go, and many less attractive ones make it)- the biggest mistake that someone can make is to think that being looking good is all you need. It is enough for you maybe, Giamanto, but not for most clients paying the higher price bracket. You left an earlier review where you mention nothing at all about service, attitude or personality, so looks may be the only priority for you, but you are in the minority. The majority of clients are not that easily pleased. Even the most shy guys or those who spend lots of social time still appreciate a bit of personality and a decent BJ.

Looks are subjective; some clients like small boobs, petite girls, BBW, whatever. You seem to be a "boob man", so can confidently say a girl who's face you've never seen is the hottest girl in London, whilst west8 and Fugly are a little less enthusiastic. So it varies from person to person. Some guys will think one look is perfect, and others wouldn't like it at all. If a WG is not very into sex, and doesn't have a good personality then she will eventually struggle- or start to attract the wrong type of client. A great rack will get a guy through the door and create a good first impression- but if you under deliver on everything else, he will not come back and you will have to get new people all the time. The top ladies in this industry are of course blessed with good looks- but are rarely the "most" attractive, and anyone who actually wants a fun time is usually too discerning to pay top dollar for looks alone. The factors you are basing someone's potential success on are inaccurate. You seem to think a woman can be really attractive but bad at timekeeping, bad in bed, and poor at communication and earn "300k a year" (25k a month- to do this she would need four clients every single day, 365 days a year at £200p/hr). This is a ridiculous notion.
Bree x

Very very good point, you are right. I lean very heavy towards looks/racks (ass/waist/hip ratio), but you are right to say the majority of the industry is run of good service. Everything you mentioned is valid and makes sense. You clearly have a good head on your shoulders, and understand the business and the psyche of the average punters more then i do.

[Stealthshagger]

'London Gangland'. Here's my take. I wrote from day one that I found Alicia 'Odd' and 'Threatening'. Her stalker like behaviour over the past few days has reinforced that opinion. It's a little odd that a single punter on this forum claims to have met her, yet that same individual drew precisely the same conclusion.

So, I have two possible explanations. Either we're both right or we both misunderstood Alicia. Only you punters can decide that by meeting her and paying your money. Then you can come back here and tell us I was wrong and that Alicia is wonderful, or that she is indeed a headcase.

For what it's worth, my initial thought was that she isn't an escort at all, but perhaps a psychology or sociology student doing this as 'research'. Or perhaps her boyfriend fancied some new wheels for his Vauxhall Viva. That's not my business, but 'gangland' in the context above refers to the repetitive Groundhog Day experience of twice attempting to arrange a meet with Alicia - and her decision to cancel twice. Anyone who used to play Gangland as a kid will know just how that felt!


Come on SS, be serious. Each and every one of us invariably disagree with the views or reviews of other members, but to say you refrain from posting as often as you once did makes you sound like a right sulker. We have had plenty of disagreements in the past, but onwards and upwards. If I dislike the style or tone of certain posters here, I just skip. It's pointless sitting at home and seething with frustration like Cornish Sub and Nightkid. Life really is too short to get SO involved in the 'politics' of an internet forum. This is supposed to be fun, but some clearly take it far too seriously.


You do seem to have an unhealthy fascination with my domestic arrangements. You would know if you had bothered to read my reply to another thread that the past week was half term. You'd also know the past week was half term as I daresay your mother has been busy preparing your school uniform for tomorrow morning.

Don't forget your apple young man.

Problem is actually that I think you make shit up to pass the time. You are a proven liar. Before you deny it, this conversation has been had multiple times. Some of what you say may be true,but ewe know some is not. Your shit stirring and lying means info and reviews here are less reliable, inherently. Don't bother responding, rather keep pretending you have me on ignore (remember that?).