Stunning Julie

[Pchew]

Location:  close to Colindale.  5mins walk.  New flat.  A few cafes nearby to chew out quite waiting.

Girl:  Not as young looking as previous report suggested.  A few wrinkles appear with smile.  Nonetheless attractive but not stunning for me.  Tits are soft but not saggy.  5 foot 6 bare foot.  Smooth skin. 

Procedure:  Went for one hour.  Greeted me in pant and bra.  Good smile.  Asked for a quick shower then in bed.  I initiated kisses which was nice.  Continued for a few mins then she proceeded to OWO.  Not very strong and indeed a bit too soft.  I started doing 69 and not very fresh smell down there so I stopped.  Went for fingering instead.  On condom and started doggy, cow girl and finished in mission.  No eye contact, only some moaning.  Rested a while and small chitchat.  Her English was good but she's not very talkative - i initiated all the conversations and her reply was fairly simple one/two sentence. 

Felt a bit awkward as i ran out of topic so I initiated round 2.  more or less the same but took longer to pop.  Finished and had a shower and then left.  There were other girls in the flat but they were fairly quiet.

Will I return?  Not sure.  She delivered all the services as stated so a positive.  She's friendly all the way through.  But somehow I didn't really click with her.  Perhaps she's tired or something.

External Link/Members Only

[tennis]

I saw her a few weeks ago and i completely agree with your review.Not a stunner IMO.
Not very talkative and was going through the motions.

[mrhappypants]

Pchew,  thank you for your review.  It is good to hear of someone setting a demandinding standard for looks and services and I will look forward to reading future recommendations from you.  I saw her a Saturday - a couple of points.  I'd give more time to get there from Colindale.  It is a nice flat.  I took something for her to wear that really suited her and this considerably helped the chemistry.  I rate her looks more highly than you but recognise all aspects of your review and think it gives good balance.  Keep the reviews coming.

Dave

[johnnyboy61]

A bit smelly below decks, didn't really engage, not sure if you would go back - sounds like a neutral rather than a positive to me, and your review doesn't encourage me to visit her.

[mrhappypants]

A bit smelly below decks...

That bit I DON'T recognise I must say, on the basis of half a dozen visits, but you can tell she smokes.

Dave

[Pchew]

Pchew,  thank you for your review.  It is good to hear of someone setting a demandinding standard for looks and services and I will look forward to reading future recommendations from you.  I saw her a Saturday - a couple of points.  I'd give more time to get there from Colindale.  It is a nice flat.  I took something for her to wear that really suited her and this considerably helped the chemistry.  I rate her looks more highly than you but recognise all aspects of your review and think it gives good balance.  Keep the reviews coming.

Dave

Thanks.  I want to contribute back as I gained a lot from the reviews.

I am quite easy going - She delivered the services as listed without complaints I am satisfied, and hence a positive.  She's not talkative but I am not bothered - sex is more important    I had my 2 pops and happy.

I suppose I had higher hopes due to her feedbacks e.g. youth looking etc.. But I do find her looking older than I expect.  So perhaps the high anticipation somewhat destroyed the illusion.

I could smell sweat down there - she's a busy girl and my appointment was pushed out by 2 hours (not last minute change of course).  But this is a one off encounter so maybe she's clean all the time.

[Type_O_Negative]

What annoys me with WGs is their "double standards" policy - they expect all punters to be top notch clean - but what about them???

So from my POV it should be NEGATIVE. Smelly girl yuk!