Sugar Baby?
Masaj
Shemales

Author Topic: monica naughty northern escorts out of jail for setting up robberies incalls  (Read 12986 times)

Naughty Northern Escorts

  • Guest
Hello guys  :)

Very sorry it has taken me so long to respond to this thread. I just do not come on this forum often but maybe should start?

Firstly I want to say a massive thank You to all our loyal and honest clients for calling our office today to make us aware of this situation. Big Appreciation. :rose:

We had no idea Monica was a criminal  :(

Regardless we have taken Monica off our site now and she will not be back! I have to say that on her interview she came across as a very nice girl, but I don't always get things right so heyho.

I'm quite shocked at the article and on her passport that was not that name  :unknown:

I am also sad that people have lied and said we have brothels, anyone who knows me and NNE knows this could not be further from the truth. Our site calendar is living proof of this and the fact we have never had issues with the police.

Please anyone who wants to speak to me regarding this matter call me. I am available till 11pm.

Thanks for reading!
Best wishes Hannah xx

I


themademan2

  • Guest
It's funny what agency's have to do now when clients start avoiding them. Maybe now u will listen to client power. U weren't exactly very helpful when I seen one of your girls and was turfed out well before my time was up. And also with neighbours sat on wall watching... Compromising client confidentiality

James999

  • Guest
I am also sad that people have lied and said we have brothels, anyone who knows me and NNE knows this could not be further from the truth. Our site calendar is living proof of this

How can a calendar on a website prove that you don't run brothels?

Offline sesalovdarlo

How can a calendar on a website prove that you don't run brothels?

Because it proves at anyone incall location there is only one girl there at a time

James999

  • Guest
Because it proves at anyone incall location there is only one girl there at a time

Can you let someone who knows what they are talking about answer it please  :dash:

Offline MDB72

The present state of the law is that a single lady in a premises who offers services is not operating or working in a brothel. The moment that there are two ladies in the premises then it becomes a brothel. On that basis a duo is illegal but the important part to remember is that the punter is committing no crime by being in a brothel. Any liability would rest with the operator of the brothel. The burden is on the prosecution to prove that. Some of the case law is ancient and will always be open to challenge. It's an interesting area of law and I do think this thread has had an element of scaremongering in it. I would much prefer to use a reputable agency like NNE or similar than take my chances with an indie who I don't know off AW. I hope this helps and is of assistance.
Banned reason: Sharing account with SP.
Banned by: daviemac

jock69

  • Guest
Hannah i do not think punters are pissed off with you because you had an escort working there that was a criminal if you did not know.

The problem was i saw the warning on pnet and had emailed the mod recently to see wether you you had been informed even though the post said you had and the mod had contacted you at least 3 times asking if you could remove her for the safety of escorts and clients and you chose to ignore them.

You have only removed her now because lots of punters know about it and its started to effect your business.

Rather then saying you did not know it is better to say sorry for making a very bad decision. The mod at pnet jkay could prove they contacted you and you did nothing until now  as it has spread like wild fire. You put punters and escorts in danger, not a wise thing to do.

themademan2

  • Guest
Hannah i do not think punters are pissed off with you because you had an escort working there that was a criminal if you did not know.

The problem was i saw the warning on pnet and had emailed the mod recently to see wether you you had been informed even though the post said you had and the mod had contacted you at least 3 times asking if you could remove her for the safety of escorts and clients and you chose to ignore them.

You have only removed her now because lots of punters know about it and its started to effect your business.

Rather then saying you did not know it is better to say sorry for making a very bad decision. The mod at pnet jkay could prove they contacted you and you did nothing until now  as it has spread like wild fire. You put punters and escorts in danger, not a wise thing to do.
Can back this guy up. My info came from another source. NNE knew who she was

Offline AnthG

Don't want to victimise her if she's going straight - but should have thought about that before she got her thug boyfriend beating up people.

The fact that she was working again as a prostitute is evidence she was not going straight.

I say that as if you are given a prison sentence of 12 months or more. You are put on probation when you come out.

External Link/Members Only

Her probation officer would have (unless it was the stupidest probation officer in history) have said as requirement number one. Don't work as a prostitute again.

So she is violating probation for one. And if she was violating probation its pretty clear its for nefarious reasons - likely to setup people for mugging again.

The draw of prostitution is not that much to violate probation for alone I would say.

Yes I could be jumping to one after the other conclusions, but I think they are reasonable conclusions to make. And given the seriousness of the people she was hanging out with, who would want to take that chance.

I am pleased NNE have seen sense and got rid of her.
« Last Edit: September 08, 2014, 06:45:14 pm by AnthG »
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

jock69

  • Guest
Thanks for backing me up. Hannah knew all along and carried on giving her jobs and punters addresses and details. Anyone that is still doubting this go and contact jkay. She should not have come on here making out she did not know, she should have come on here and said guys i kept her on and i shouldn't have and very sorry that i did. She has done herself no favours but at least Monica has finally gone and everyone will be on the look out if she pops up anywhere else in the northeast!!!

OldAdmin

  • Guest
Thanks for backing me up. Hannah knew all along and carried on giving her jobs and punters addresses and details. Anyone that is still doubting this go and contact jkay. She should not have come on here making out she did not know, she should have come on here and said guys i kept her on and i shouldn't have and very sorry that i did. She has done herself no favours but at least Monica has finally gone and everyone will be on the look out if she pops up anywhere else in the northeast!!!

Looks from recent investigation I've banned you twice before.
Apparently you are also a rival pimp, possibly the NorthAngels scumbag.

James999

  • Guest
The present state of the law is that a single lady in a premises who offers services is not operating or working in a brothel. The moment that there are two ladies in the premises then it becomes a brothel.

As I said previously

Can you let someone who knows what they are talking about answer it please  :dash:

Bradley

  • Guest
I for one am pleased this is now over.

It was disconcerting to think an agency I have enjoyed using was deliberately ignoring important information. I'm satisfied Hannah has cleared this up and I will be using them again. Jock69's tone was certainly alarmist but then I am easily alarmed.

tinytim

  • Guest
The present state of the law is that a single lady in a premises who offers services is not operating or working in a brothel. The moment that there are two ladies in the premises then it becomes a brothel. On that basis a duo is illegal but the important part to remember is that the punter is committing no crime by being in a brothel. Any liability would rest with the operator of the brothel. The burden is on the prosecution to prove that. Some of the case law is ancient and will always be open to challenge. It's an interesting area of law and I do think this thread has had an element of scaremongering in it. I would much prefer to use a reputable agency like NNE or similar than take my chances with an indie who I don't know off AW. I hope this helps and is of assistance.

I'm sorry but you are wrong. If more than one women work from the same address then it is a brothel. They don't have to be working the same day. The calendar simply proves that some of the location have three or more women working from the same location. If you don't believe me check out the cps guidance "Premises only become a brothel when more than one woman uses premises for the purposes of prostitution, either simultaneously or one at a time (Stevens v Christy [1987] Cr. App. R. 249, DC). This implies that if two women are present, both must be there for the purposes of prostitution. In circumstances where prostitutes are working individually out of one flat but there is a rotation of occupants and the young women are moved on a regular basis; i.e. sole occupancy and a rotation of sole occupants, it does constitute a brothel."External Link/Members Only

Offline sesalovdarlo

I'm sorry but you are wrong. If more than one women work from the same address then it is a brothel. They don't have to be working the same day. The calendar simply proves that some of the location have three or more women working from the same location. If you don't believe me check out the cps guidance "Premises only become a brothel when more than one woman uses premises for the purposes of prostitution, either simultaneously or one at a time (Stevens v Christy [1987] Cr. App. R. 249, DC). This implies that if two women are present, both must be there for the purposes of prostitution. In circumstances where prostitutes are working individually out of one flat but there is a rotation of occupants and the young women are moved on a regular basis; i.e. sole occupancy and a rotation of sole occupants, it does constitute a brothel."External Link/Members Only



Wow hard to think that most of the escort agencies offering incalls are operating illegally

tinytim

  • Guest
Wow hard to think that most of the escort agencies offering incalls are operating illegally

The police turn a blind eye unless for what ever the reason they get interested. But your right they are all basically brothels and the people who run the agencies "keepers of brothels". Since I know some of these flats are rented it puts the owners in bother if the police pursue prosecution. Still the girls and the punters are ok  :rolleyes:

James999

  • Guest
I'm sorry but you are wrong. If more than one women work from the same address then it is a brothel. They don't have to be working the same day. The calendar simply proves that some of the location have three or more women working from the same location. If you don't believe me check out the cps guidance "Premises only become a brothel when more than one woman uses premises for the purposes of prostitution, either simultaneously or one at a time (Stevens v Christy [1987] Cr. App. R. 249, DC). This implies that if two women are present, both must be there for the purposes of prostitution. In circumstances where prostitutes are working individually out of one flat but there is a rotation of occupants and the young women are moved on a regular basis; i.e. sole occupancy and a rotation of sole occupants, it does constitute a brothel."External Link/Members Only


Correct   :hi:

James999

  • Guest
The police turn a blind eye unless for what ever the reason they get interested.

That should read the Police often turn a blind eye, they then get a change of heart / political pressure or the like and close down brothels and prosecute, in addition the POCA gives them a financial incentive to do so.

James999

  • Guest
Still the girls and the punters are ok  :rolleyes:

But oddly not the maid who answers the phones, hangs the towels on the radiators to dry the spunk, rinses out the condoms etc  :wacko:
« Last Edit: September 09, 2014, 07:52:14 am by James999 »

Offline baresi

But oddly not the maid who answers the phones, hangs the towels on the radiators to dry the spunk, rinses out the condoms etc  :wacko:




and they say romance is dead  :lol:

Offline portable


Correct   :hi:

If you knew this, why didn't you just correct the two other guys instead of slagging them off?

James999

  • Guest
If you knew this, why didn't you just correct the two other guys instead of slagging them off?

I seem to have picked up a stalker  :kiss:

The agency owner made a statement, I questioned it, and waited for her response, a coupld of others popped in to try and answer on her behalf, and were wrong, I was waiting to see her response, it's not my job to help her stay within the law  :hi:

And saying someone is wrong is not slagging someone off, keep talking shite and there's a pretty good chance you will get slagged off, but I suspect you're used ot it  :unknown:
« Last Edit: September 09, 2014, 08:20:32 pm by James999 »

Found out

  • Guest
Seen this girl a few weeks ago in Walker in Newcastle working from  flat here's here AW profile name people like this a are scum.
 nAUGHTY_NAIOME
« Last Edit: February 10, 2015, 12:29:51 pm by Found out »

Barry Shipton

  • Guest
Seen this girl a few weeks ago in Walker in Newcastle working from  flat here's here AW profile name people like this a are scum.
 nAUGHTY_NAIOME
Presumably you mean this Naughty Naiome
External Link/Members Only

Shame we didn't screenshot her vital stats at NNE to double check its her - hopefully a member who knows her can confirm so we aren't accusing an innocent girl.

If you're a well meaning punting citizen thanks for the update on this dangerous prossie who is one to avoid - hopefully not a rival pimp trying to do down a rival like the last guy to report her.

Found out

  • Guest
Presumably you mean this Naughty Naiome
External Link/Members Only

Shame we didn't screenshot her vital stats at NNE to double check its her - hopefully a member who knows her can confirm so we aren't accusing an innocent girl.

If you're a well meaning punting citizen thanks for the update on this dangerous prossie who is one to avoid - hopefully not a rival pimp trying to do down a rival like the last guy to report her.

Yes it's most definitely her and she told me her name was Kim , probably not meaning too !!
« Last Edit: February 10, 2015, 01:53:59 pm by Found out »

Found out

  • Guest
It seems like an agency in Liverpool is using the same girl, at least pics and name rings alarm bells not to mention stats .... Looks like these agency don't really care.

External Link/Members Only



Naomi
« Last Edit: February 10, 2015, 03:07:17 pm by Found out »

Found out

  • Guest
Presumably you mean this Naughty Naiome
External Link/Members Only

Shame we didn't screenshot her vital stats at NNE to double check its her - hopefully a member who knows her can confirm so we aren't accusing an innocent girl.

If you're a well meaning punting citizen thanks for the update on this dangerous prossie who is one to avoid - hopefully not a rival pimp trying to do down a rival like the last guy to report her.

External Link/Members Only

Naomi


OldAdmin

  • Guest
Seen this girl a few weeks ago in Walker in Newcastle working from  flat here's here AW profile name people like this a are scum.
 nAUGHTY_NAIOME

Why did you create a second account (despite the warning on registration page) and make posts signing off with 'Naomi'.
Such as the post above.

Andy20

  • Guest
Just thought people might find this useful - if you want to go and look at old webpages over the last 10 or so years

External Link/Members Only

Don't know if I am supposed to put links but apologies if I shouldn't.

Its called the wayback time machine.

Cheers