ENGLISH CHLOE UK X, Bamber Bridge, near Preston

[Heph]

ENGLISH CHLOE UK X, Bamber Bridge nr Preston
Incall, 2hrs, £320
External Link/Members Only
NB: she's been working since at least 2017, and according to one reviewer, likely far longer than that. Previous aliases include Sexy Alexus; The British Goddess; English_Alexus; English Alexus; English Erotic Emily and Platinumpussyx. Including this report, those linked profiles give her a 3:1:7 positive to negative ratio. Doubtless more rebadging will follow as she continues to abuse our fellow punters and their goodwill. She tours throughout the Northwest and Scotland.

TL;DR
A chiseller: a bait-and-switcher of her likes list; a time-waster and probable fake picture peddler. You are advised to avoid her and better invest your cash elsewhere.

Background
This is going to be a gratifying post. A few months ago I posted in the North West section ( https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=458152.0 ), looking to track down her profile so that I could share this well-deserved negative feedback on this one. After some months of fruitlessly searching, today I found her. She tours and periodically takes her profile down when she has earned enough money, though I have a feeling that I overlooked her hiding in plain sight for some time, because the current main gallery pictures are, in my opinion, not of her, or else are not currently representative of her.

Comms
Straightforward in the arrangement phase whilst the going was good and with £320 dangling in front of her; obfuscatory when I later pointed out her various misrepresentations.

Venue
Her current page describes her base as 'a luxury apartment'. I'm fairly certain that the small town of Bamber Bridge contains no such venue that is available to her. It's quite possible that she's operating from an entirely different location to my visit, although it's more likely that if it isn't just an outright lie, this detail has been left in the body-copy as a general catch-all for her tours. In this case, I was visiting Purple Roomz: a low-budget venue without the standards of Travelodge and it shows. Scallies were loitering about smoking by the entrance and a small, ultra basic room with a tiny bathroom, wholly unsuited for the watersports she claims to offer.

The brat
Raven haired, pale-skinned and with bright, light-blue/grey eyes, she's pretty, I'll give her that. However, I'll qualify this by saying that it's minor league stuff: she's a 6.something, not quite 6.5. You'd be glad to leave with her at closing time, but in a line of of a dozen city girls, at best she'd come in fourth place on average. She's quite a little chubster too (albeit with an inconsistently narrow waist relative to her larger overall frame). I'll also concede that for the most part, she was pleasant in person, though whilst we were in the room, I'd certainly given her no reason to be anything other than this basic minimum requirement.

I repeat that I don't think her gallery photos are her, and if they are, they are from some time ago and she's double-digits of kilos heavier. She's in her early thirties now, rather than the advertised 27 and the puppy-fat is slowly turning to hardened lard. She's uglified herself with cheap tattoos, fake nails, and her dark, lush locks, on closer inspection, are mostly a not so well done weave.

Events
I'm tempted to paint a colourfully descriptive picture here but I'll confine myself to the essentials of what happened (or, more pertinently, what didn't) between us, and later augment my observations with those of other contributors here whose experiences mirror mine.

Her likes list is pretty comprehensive and covers a good deal of what most members here, and, I'd argue, most punters in general, tend to expect as the core escort offering. I had no red-line wish-list of requirements, but when we see, inter-alia, Anal play; Bukkake; CIM (disc); Deep throat; Face-sitting; Fingering; FK; Hand relief; Moresomes; OWO (disc); Penetration; Rimming (G+R) and Watersports, we have most of the bases we might want covered.

I'm usually well-groomed and presented, in respectable shape for my age; I'd washed thoroughly not 45 minutes before arriving and topped this up with another brief shower on arrival to allay any hygiene concerns. In short, after a lengthy massage by me to her, at more or less every turn, she became obstructive for what you'd consider a normal standard escort interaction. "I don't do OWO" left me puzzling at my own memory, since I'd not have selected her if it wasn't present in her offering. I blamed myself for what I assumed must've been my own oversight. How about me going down on her? "No, I never do that". Kissing? 'No'. Fingering? 'No'. I rubbered up; and she gave head- I can't remember anything of it. She mounted me: unstimulated, it lacked anything notably better than I could hope for if I were pass time by fucking a fireplace. With my mood going south faster than a duck in winter, I whipped off the condom and asked if she would finish me by hand: reader, she reached for another condom... and was about to apply it. In 35 years of whoring, I have never before or since encountered anything like this. A 'WTAF!' seems apt.

I left early, in as good grace as I could muster after passing on any satisfaction. Waiting for my cab, I checked her AW page: OWO (at discretion) was present, as were all the other items she'd variously declined. I challenged her on this: she doubled-down, insistent, amongst other things, that she has never listed RO, which at the time, I had to grant- wasn't present, though face-sitting was. How to square that?

Perhaps I was particularly unsavoury that day? Sure, it's a possibility, but unlikely after 2 showers inside the hour immediately before body-contact. Is it also possible that I'm generally repulsive? Certainly that could be, but a stunningly good-looking wife; an equally top-drawer SB of 3years; a good-looking side-chick and 43 paid encounters since (half of which are repeats, and a third with freebie-offering regulars) might suggest that the Occam's razor explanation is more plausible. That is: 6 fellow punters out of 11 total reviews on this site also rate her negative, and describe similar experiences to mine. Several others who haven't reviewed, also chip-in unfavourably. I'll add selection from both groups in the comments, with which you may arm and forewarn yourself, in the event that you might unwisely think 'but it'll be different for me'

Summary
Her looks have carried her thus far, but they won't last much longer. This was a deeply unsatisfactory meet. In the post-match messaging, I asked for a token refund, more in hope of offering her a chance at redemption than expectation that she'd have the good character to do so. Leaving early had been my choice, but as I first arrived at the venue (on time) she had chiselled me on time, by asking me to run an errand fetching condoms for her. It later became evident in her messages that she nevertheless considered that to have been my start-time. After reading that, my sense of dissatisfaction became a feeling of having been cheated.

Conclusion
She clearly has form: on the basis of her current review count, you have more than twice the chance of having a memorably poor experience than you're likely to have a good one. You have to ask yourself if you're feeling lucky. Well, punk... do ya?


Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Heph]

An anthology of highlighted comments from other members who have encountered English Chloe X in all her dreary awfulness. They're mostly taken from her cumulative reviews under her various aliases, though some are thread comments from those who've seen but not formally reviewed her themselves. Some editing and joining of separate comments has taken place, for reasons of space and cohesion, but it's all been done in good faith to the original posts.

You be the jury. Here are witness statements-

1. "I said i want owo which she said she doesnt really do...i just had shower so im obviously clean. She agrees but it kinda killed moment from there. I asked to cim or facial, she said no. States on profile she does. But pissed off now so dont say anything. No kissing throughout."
-Man8

2. "She starts making her way to the fella and rubs it for 5 seconds? then reaches for the condom. I asked for OWO but she says she doesent do it. I said its on her likes she replied its at discretion and alot of girls dont do it i knew she was full of shit. I then asked do you do kissing, also responded with a no and her excuse this time was she had a sore throat"
-Punta23

3. "...sex in multiple positions but she wasnt very good at CG. She has alevels listed but forget that as she said I was too big and I'm not exactly mandingo so probably bullshit"
-manfox (NB: and his was a rare positive review)

4. "I rang Alexus and agreed 1 hour owo deep throat £120 over the phone, got there pants down, she pulls a condom out, says shes got "a cold"and can't do owo Well you agreed owo an hour ago over the phone...luckily hadn't handed the £ over. ...only punt I've had that I didn't cum as she was dire, fit but dire."
-rickandmorty1208

5. "It's evidently just a job & not one she particularly enjoys or her heart is in. BJ was decent nothing outstanding, the kissing... consisted of a few disinterested pecks on the lips & made me feel like a scumbag for even asking... Her general body language just told me she'd rather not be doing this. Left feeling like I'd wasted my money & I'd have been better off having a wank. This one needs to find a new job, she's a poor SP & obviously dislikes everything about it but the money... when you've requested nothing more than a really tame, vanilla session."
-Kool Keef

6. "She didn't seem to be into the meet, she look uninterested. I was freshly showered and clean and smelling good like usual but she didn't do the agreed OWO, also whilst she was wanking me off she didn't want any pre cum going on her body. The meeting was already slow, robotic and I thought there is no point arguing. She probably does like to drag out the introduction and likes to finish early. Service was a 2/10 and attitude wasn't great. She also didn't want to do CIM even though it's on her likes and her profile says "all inclusive no extras"
-Zainkahn123

7. "no owo... but also was putting a condom on to finish with HR... she just does not like cum, which is a bit of a problem in her line of work & again like you it was a very rushed experience. Unless you are happy with a very limited service... I'd avoid because the reality of the meet will be a big disappointment. You would feel short changed after, it just isn't the right job for her. She wants all the rewards without any of the work or service."
-Boltonagain

8. "Ive had a punt with this girl and i thought exactly the same shes false advertising! She said ive got a little mark on my penis and it could be ANYTHING its absolutely nothing and hence she couldn't do owo. There was no kissing involved either"
-Filli

9. "Mirrors my experience too, awful punt. She had a face like a slapped ass."
-DylzzCee

10. "This is pretty much identical to a meet I had with her... She wouldn’t do OWO as she said it’s only for regulars and then while finishing me by hand she made me cum into a bin and stood quite far away from me not even looking. I think she’s quite repulsed by what she’s doing but clearly likes the lifestyle the cash provides. One of the strangest encounters I’ve had. As others have said - I left feeling horrible. I would strongly avoid."
-Logitech

11. "I took a chance with this one , oh I really shouldn't have. ...had a fairly extensive likes list so though fuck it lets go. No kissing or foreplay straight on with a condom on my half limp dick. No owo,cim as advertised reasonable blowjob then she says sextime? She comes out with dont come inside me even with a rubber on! After a awkward missionary 5 mins where he angles herself to limit my movement. Honestly guys find a day old kebab and stick your little fella in that itll be a more pleasurable experience."
-David081980

12. "Such a bad experience and I was out the door in 20 minutes. Worst punt ever."
-Jaymagnum11


You're seeing a corroborative pattern or two of her behaviours here, right?

[Shutty238]

Sounds terrible.
I'm curious though, on what basis did you decide investing £320 for a two hour meet was a good idea?

[Philmeboots]

Well Heph  that's one of the great demolition reviews ever,totally justified from your experience and the other information garnished from previous reviews.

Just out of curiosity why did you book her in the first place..not a criticism just wondering.

You have done everyone else a massive favour and hopefully dusty phone for the waste of space.. whatever her profile.

[OakTree]

Bad luck Heph, sounds truly grim. For some reason I had this one on my hot list. Now removed.

A great heads up.

[Heph]

Shutty238 and Philmeboots:

Gents, those are fair questions, and it's salutory to have to account for the answer. I'd put out ½ a dozen enquiries a few days before for an incall at my very nice and spacious apartment, and per my customary tastes, had counted on an indulgent fews hours. Preston does have options, but much of the low-hanging fruit is Brazilian or Thai production-line: the better alternatives tend to not be available at less than several hours' notice.

Two enquiries had replied, and one was booked in, but had cancelled perhaps 90 mins before the appointed hour. I therefore arrived in town in a state of heightened anticipation with few suitable and ready options. At the time, Chloe's pictures were different; her advertised offering ticked all the main boxes, and - key this - I didn't use this site's search function to check her form, and mistakenly gave her quite high AW feedback (c. 50) more weight than it deserved (next-to-none). I think I was on my way to hers within 20 minutes of having looked her up.

Short answer: I was underprepared, too horny and hubristic.


Note to Forum Helpers: i'm seeing that although my review has been added to her tally, the aggregate total of her review score does seem to have shifted upwards with its inclusion and she's still showing 6 rather than 7 negatives in her score.

[scouting]

Note to Forum Helpers: i'm seeing that although my review has been added to her tally, the aggregate total of her review score does seem to have shifted upwards with its inclusion and she's still showing 6 rather than 7 negatives in her score.

Not sure why that would be mate. Your review was posted at 2.56am so it would have caught this morning's update. I gather from my time here there were some difficulties with keeping the review scores accurate on an old system (others will be far more knowledgeable than me). Do you happen to know if the stats showed 4-1-6 before your review was posted? IE it is possible that a discrepancy is historical, if the stats showed 4-1-5 before your review that would be the case.

NB the score of 4 positives with only 3 positive reviews showing will be due to a discredited review being moved to discussions.

[Heph]

Yes, I'm pretty sure her review summary was 6 negative before posting. I had thought her positive score was also 4, but noticed that only 3 were actually green-texted b/c of the dubious origins of 1. It's no biggie for me, but i thought it was worth pointing out so that her true ratio of 3:1:7 positive to negative is highlighted for the benefit of those who need to know.

[Captain caveman 69]

Sorry but to pay £320 to a escort with six negative reviews to me is beyond belief totally brain dead.
Have you ever considered you might be a closet masochist 

[Heph]

You may be misapprehending my post above: she had six negative reviews on here: but at the time I booked her, I had not seen them -

At the time... key this - I didn't use this site's search function to check her form, and mistakenly gave her quite high AW feedback (c. 50) more weight than it deserved (next-to-none).

-which, I concede, is on me. If I had seen them (and, more importantly, the ratio of bad-to-good), it's almost certain I'd not have booked her: I wasn't making a contrarian bet.

Anyway, now we've all got seven solid reasons, and more, not to visit her; my loss is your gain.

[Captain caveman 69]

You may be misapprehending my post above: she had six negative reviews on here: but at the time I booked her, I had not seen them -

-which, I concede, is on me. If I had seen them (and, more importantly, the ratio of bad-to-good), it's almost certain I'd not have booked her: I wasn't making a contrarian bet.

Anyway, now we've all got seven solid reasons, and more, not to visit her; my loss is your gain.

well you have certainly done a job on her your review will most certainly affect her and rightly so a truly disgusting and dishonest service provider she'll soon have to find herself a real job as she's likely running out of people to rip off.