SophieSanchez -- Dollis Hill, NW2

[aberg3]

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Sophie works from a ground floor apartment in  Dollis Hill. The location is convenient for the North Circular and there is free on-street parking which you have to hunt around for. I'm not sure about tube connections.

I paid £200 for an hour in late April which seems high for the location and the level of service. She has extras which push the price even higher but I didn't take any of these. Comms were straightforward and I booked a couple of hours ahead.

Sophie herself is medium-height with a slim figure. She was dressed casually in a loose t-shirt and shorts and hadn't seemed to have made any effort for the appointment. Her profile says she is 19 years old but, at close range, you can see this is far from the truth. I'd say she is really around 30 and you can see evidence of facial work and fillers. She speaks English very well and appears to be Portuguese as claimed or perhaps Brazilian

Her manner was polite but very detached as though she just wanted to get the booking out of the way as quickly as possible.

The bedroom is nice and large but I didn't feel completely comfortable because it's on the ground floor and just a few feet away from a busy pavement. I could hear people taking directly outside and this also made it hard for me to feel relaxed.

Sophie undressed quickly and I could then see that she has many tattoos. I didn't find these attractive myself but others may do so of course. The strange thing is that her profile pictures don't show any tattoos and, from looking at these more closely after the meeting, I would say that they are not genuine pictures of Sophie.

I had only booked a regular service and we went quickly through the motions of O, RO and sex in two positions. She performed the services efficiently but in a very mechanical and unenjoyable way. Her breasts, and her body overall, feel strangely deflated as though she has had a lot of recent weight loss, but it's hard to be sure why this would actually be. I usually enjoy RO but kept it very brief this time because Sophie wasn't very fresh unfortunately.

We chatted briefly about the hot weather afterwards and I then cleaned up in the nice but very small bathroom and then dressed and went on my way after 35 minutes with a heavy feeling of wasted time and money. There were local people standing directly outside the building chatting as I left which felt a bit uncomfortable.
 
Sophie did everything but it was completely mechanical and I felt she hadn't prepared well or made herself fresh for the meeting. I also feel that she is representing herself very inaccurately in terms of her age and her appearance (tattoos etc)

For these reasons, and at this price level, I have to rate this as a negative and pretty depressing experience.

[PilotMan]

Her profile says she is 19 years old but, at close range, you can see this is far from the truth. I'd say she is really around 30 and you can see evidence of facial work and fillers.

The strange thing is that her profile pictures don't show any tattoos and, from looking at these more closely after the meeting, I would say that they are not genuine pictures of Sophie.

I also feel that she is representing herself very inaccurately in terms of her age and her appearance (tattoos etc)

She has already been called out on the use of images that are not hers, IIRC someone reported it to AW and her profile got flagged.

It sounds like a deserved negative.

[patelprat]

Sorry it didn't work out OP.

Haven't seen her for months, but I never personally had an issue with her freshness, and just looking now, her profile states she has tattoos and to not book her if you don't like tattoos, which at the time she told me she didn't want on the photos for privacy reasons.

[aberg3]

The point is that the images in her profile should match reality and they don't at all. I'm sure they are not even images of her. You shouldn't have to go looking around the profile for 'small print'. It's unclear why you are keen to step in and defend images which give a very misleading impression and are probably not even pictures of the SP. The pictures she is displaying could plausibly be an un-tattooed 19 year old girl but, in reality, she is heavily tattooed and about 10 years older.

[patelprat]

The point is that the images in her profile should match reality and they don't at all. I'm sure they are not even images of her. You shouldn't have to go looking around the profile for 'small print'. It's unclear why you are keen to step in and defend images which give a very misleading impression and are probably not even pictures of the SP. The pictures she is displaying could plausibly be an un-tattooed 19 year old girl but, in reality, she is heavily tattooed and about 10 years older.

Not defending her, did I dispute anything you wrote?

Did you actually read the other reviews on here before booking her? If you had done, it would have made clear she has tonnes of tattoos that don't show on the photos. And I said myself in my review that I couldn't verify 100% they were her photos.

[aberg3]

The simple point is that her published images and her stated age should reflect reality and they fail to do so by a long way. I see now that several reviewers have raised the same concerns about this SP. These basic misrepresentations can't be excused.

[Shadow314]

Sounds rather similar to my visit, especially the "polite but very detached" observation.
Commiserations OP.

[kasamaa]

Previous reviews says she is early 20’s and now 2 reviews saying she’s in her 30’s

Could it be a different girl now using the profile I wonder

[aberg3]

The reviews cover a short period in March and April so probably not a different girl. More likely the same girl in the wrong job as another reviewer suggested.