Throat Queen Jasmine - Heathrow

[Jonestown]

Anyone able to get through to her today?

I got a WhatsApp response this morning, you have to use WhatsApp with them.

[pr0ace1]

“I mentioned I was going to leave a review of her, so I suppose she put two and two together” ????

Do you honestly not see the massive problem with this?? There is a reason it’s strongly advised never to mention UKpunting to SP’s. Not only does it piss the vast majority of them off, it can be used to forcibly coerce and blackmail SP’s into not consenting.

My first reaction to the above quote is why was the Punter even mentioning UKpunting to her AT ALL? What was his goal in doing that? This isn’t Nando’s or a small business where you can threaten with Tustpilot then just waltz back.


It was a heat of the moment thing- after wasting about 5 hours of my day… I think it’s justified. But I take your point about remaining anonymous and not mentioning it
This SP has been known to very strongly dislike seeing people of this forum. Even if you so much as know what this site is she gets very jumpy about it and one punter was in a situation where she had literally lost her mind cos he mentioned that he posts on it. If he had bothered to research her he would have know that wouldn’t be a good idea, so why on earth he mentions it too her I have to wonder about his intentions.

Go see a girl, feign ignorance of this site as to not be outed and remain anonymous. Busy nuts have fun with honest reviews of your exp. That’s the MO of this site. Mentioning it to SP’s does not do anyone favours.

[PilotMan]

“I mentioned I was going to leave a review of her, so I suppose she put two and two together” ????

I don't see a problem telling an SP that I'm going to leave a negative review, only if I have NO intention of visiting her again.

I never mention UKP, I let them assume I'm talking about AW.

[rioblack90]

I don't see a problem telling an SP that I'm going to leave a negative review, only if I have NO intention of visiting her again.

I never mention UKP, I let them assume I'm talking about AW.

The context I read this in, was that he hadn’t even seen her yet and was trying to use a review as leverage as some sort.

[Massagemanmr]

You have missed the issue (actually)

The girl only blocked him off the back of his negative review.
Most sps don't like this site, are you telling me that you agree with sps banning punters for leaving negative reviews? 

Sps have the clienteye app to report bad punters.
punters have this site to report on bad expereinces of sps. It is a fair system 

most sps would not want to see a punter who goes around leaving reviews of their experience, they would be scared if they themselves recieve a negative review from them.

Good sps have nothing to worry about as they recieve good and glowing positive reviews from punters.

It is the bad sps who have a problem with this. My advice to those sps is to deliver better service than complain or ban punters due to their honest reviews of them.

That is all I have to say on the matter.

Make sure you know which side your bread is buttered mate

the girl has blocked him she does not want to see him , you should not be encouraging him or anyone to use another number  

[Massagemanmr]

She can't say no if you grow a mustache like Charlie Chaplin and create new memories for her throat

this always works for me Hidden Image/Members Only

[puntingking]

the girl has blocked him she does not want to see him , you should not be encouraging him or anyone to use another number 

it's a free country 

[puntingking]

Do you honestly not see the massive problem with this?? There is a reason it’s strongly advised never to mention UKpunting to SP’s. Not only does it piss the vast majority of them off, it can be used to forcibly coerce and blackmail SP’s into not consenting.

I do agree with this, in that members of this site should not be telling sps about this site in the first place (if that what happens  ) 

[Jonestown]

the girl has blocked him she does not want to see him , you should not be encouraging him or anyone to use another number  

I agree, what do people think is going to happen when he sneaks his way into the room and she recognises him as someone she has blocked and effectively banned ?

[patelprat]

I agree, what do people think is going to happen when he sneaks his way into the room and she recognises him as someone she has blocked and effectively banned ?

The context matters here, how would she recognise him?
 
He didn't meet her, I can only assume she never laid eyes on him, he was left waiting too long (in the hotel lobby I'd guess) due to her being busy with others in the queue, even though she had agreed to a specific time, so he left. Had he waited it out, no doubt she'd have eventually seen him.

He is blocked because she tied him back to this review based on what he said in his text comms to her (presumably that he was going to leave a negative review for time wasting). Not defending him, and I do not necessarily blame the SP for blocking him, but that was his only mistake that led to this.

[Jonestown]

It’s known the SP is following this thread, what is it going to do to her mental state to know that someone she has blocked/banned has proposed and is being actively encouraged by members on this forum to find a way round that ban. It’s not for the OP or members of the forum to decide if the reason for the ban is justified, it’s the SP’s choice, which she is perfectly entitled to enact.

[patelprat]

It’s known the SP is following this thread, what is it going to do to her mental state to know that someone she has blocked/banned has proposed and is being actively encouraged by members on this forum to find a way round that ban. It’s not for the OP or members of the forum to decide if the reason for the ban is justified, it’s the SP’s choice, which she is perfectly entitled to enact.

Agreed it's her choice.

But I doubt an SP like this, who is currently very popular, isn't aware that this can easily happen (clients trying on different numbers) and possibly already has happened with guys she has met.

[puntingking]

It’s known the SP is following this thread, what is it going to do to her mental state to know that someone she has blocked/banned has proposed and is being actively encouraged by members on this forum to find a way round that ban. It’s not for the OP or members of the forum to decide if the reason for the ban is justified, it’s the SP’s choice, which she is perfectly entitled to enact.

and it is for the op to make a choice whether he wants to change his number and to attempt to see her again

We are going round in circles here.

The op was blocked by the sp for no other reason than because of this review. we should be encouraging members to review honestly about sps.

I salute the op   

[puntingking]

I just gave pr0ace1 a "like" to show my appreciation for this review. 

[puntingking]

Agreed it's her choice.

But I doubt an SP like this, who is currently very popular, isn't aware that this can easily happen (clients trying on different numbers) and possibly already has happened with guys she has met.

+1

all most clients punters would do it if they really want to see a sp badly enough 

It is not a bad thing in my view.

Other members may or may not agree but that is fine. 

[MLawro93]

+1

all most clients punters would do it if they really want to see a sp badly enough 

It is not a bad thing in my view.

Other members may or may not agree but that is fine. 

She's said no, and that's it. Her screening is how she chooses who she sees. It's how she consents. Encouraging someone to get round that with a new number isn't a harmless workaround, it's encouraging him to remove her ability to make an informed choice about who walks through her door. Whether you think her reason for blocking him is fair is completely irrelevant. It's her decision, not ours, and she doesn't owe anyone a justification.

"Most punters would do it" isn't the defence you think it is, mate. It just says something pretty uncomfortable about those punters. OP, if you want what she offers, find another SP who provides it. Don't trick someone into seeing you after they've already said no.

[puntingking]

She's said no, and that's it. Her screening is how she chooses who she sees. It's how she consents. Encouraging someone to get round that with a new number isn't a harmless workaround, it's encouraging him to remove her ability to make an informed choice about who walks through her door. Whether you think her reason for blocking him is fair is completely irrelevant. It's her decision, not ours, and she doesn't owe anyone a justification.

"Most punters would do it" isn't the defence you think it is, mate. It just says something pretty uncomfortable about those punters. OP, if you want what she offers, find another SP who provides it. Don't trick someone into seeing you after they've already said no.

Just so you know, this sp doesn't want to see any ukp member as mentioned before.
So please respect that and don't see her as it is her choice 

[Massagemanmr]

Just so you know, this sp doesn't want to see any ukp member as mentioned before.
So please respect that and don't see her as it is her choice 

again you don't know her reason for not wanting to see him.

please be serious about this situation You're actively encouraging people not to respect an SP that has said no and you seem to think this is a joke?

What other behaviour do you encourage when an SP says no......

Just respect her wishes and move on

[koshkaj]

Not directly related to this SP, but on the topic being discussed, it happens a lot.

I saw a different SP who told me she had just spent a very unpleasant 90 minutes with a punter she had blocked. he had messaged her from a different number to arrange a booking. i asked her why she still let him in when she saw him before opening the door and she said "because he had already travelled here to see me".

i left it at that, but i did feel a bit sorry for her, felt like she was in a bit of an impossible situation. leave him oustide and worry about if he hangs around as he knows where she is, or let him in and suffer in silence. she chose the latter option.

[puntingking]

again you don't know her reason for not wanting to see him.

please be serious about this situation You're actively encouraging people not to respect an SP that has said no and you seem to think this is a joke?

What other behaviour do you encourage when an SP says no......

Just respect her wishes and move on

 ok, I get what you are saying

[BrixtonBrewers]

It was a heat of the moment thing- after wasting about 5 hours of my day… I think it’s justified. But I take your point about remaining anonymous and not mentioning it

I've done this before when I was really pissed off but regretted it a few hours later once I'd calmed down a bit. I definitely wouldn't say it to anyone that I had any intention of seeing again though.

I don't like the idea of meeting someone under a different number especially as you were pissed off with her after what happened. Surely you'd be going in there still feeling a bit pissed off about the previous incident? Even if she isn't aware of who you are wouldn't that feel weird and would have been a shit booking?

[puntingking]

I messaged yesterday but no response, how did you guys make booking. I need to join the queue, if you tuckers see me make sure to say Hi and be kind enough to let me jump the queue

relax, not to worry. She does not respond to messages on her days off. She only replies to messages on whatsapp on the day she is working. She works from Hotels.
You have most likely just been unlucky in contacting her on her days off, keep trying on other days and your luck will soon align with her work schedule.