TS Hanna - London Outcall

[COB77]

External Link/Members Only

I met Hanna for a 1-hour appointment in February 2026. I assumed the profile was fake but took a chance in contacting her. She was very responsive and we arranged a meeting for £300. As per her profile she only does outcall appointments - I was asked to book 2 Ubers on top of the price. She mentioned video call verification on her profile, so I asked and we had a quick call. The video wasn't very clear (she was outside, wearing a baseball cap and it was night) but I was satisfied enough to proceed.

The woman who showed up at my door was not the lady in the pictures. The Hanna in front of me was short and petite, with pale skin and wavy, dirty-blonde hair. Wearing black trousers and a top under her winter coat. I found the accent hard to place but maybe South-East Europe? She had a warm but shy manner. We chatted for a bit before heading to the bedroom. The experience was pretty good. She has a lovely figure and looked great in the black lingerie she was wearing. It was very much a sensual, GFE-type meeting. She went down on me and seemed to enjoy this. I returned the favour and she got hard but it seemed she loses an erection easily. We just went with the flow, but I got the impression she is bottom-only. Sex in several positions until I finished.   

I had a good time, but I wouldn't see her again. First, she is 100% not the girl in her photos. Second, the experience was good rather than great.
 
I looked on the usual sites to see if there was anyone who looked similar to the person I saw. This girl, Queren (External Link/Members Only) was the closest I could find. To be clear - Hanna is not Queren - but just as a guide I think Queren is reasonably similar looking.

[jamiekinkxxx]

A negative sounds a tad harsh OP (but 100% your call), reads more a neutral IMHO.

I mean she may not have been the girl in the pictures, but you did have a video call (and were ..."satisfied enough to proceed") and "she has a lovely figure and looked great in the black lingerie she was wearing" plus although you would not see her again you still "...had a good time... the experience was good rather than great."

You must have high standards if a good time only = a negative. But 100% respect your decision to mark as a negative.

[Voyager]

The report does read positive...

[Hansthatdodishes]

In my humble option - Always a negative if it's not the girl advertised - that's standard.... however if you had a video with her and you still decided to proceed, then I think that sheds a whole new light on it... which clearly your camera needs too lolzz

[tempwork]

Thank you Cob for this review. The photos in the add are stunning but since you are sure that is not her then they are completely irrelevant. No matter what is the action there is always a disappointment when someone else turns up. Using someone else's photos is trying to trick the customer and I totally understand your rating of Negative.
As for your description of events they sound interesting enough for me to ask a couple of questions and maybe venture a meeting with her.
Does she have any breasts or is she completely flat?
How big would you estimate her erection?
Did you discuss her topping at all and what was her response?
Was there any DFK?