Why should you worry about what escorts other members on here chose to see? If you don't fancy them don't book them but don't question other who do want to see them.
We are desperately trying to make the place more friendly in order to encourage new members and new posters but comments like yours only serve to put people off.
I'm not worried in the slightest about what escorts other members see: I'm making what, so far as I can see, is or ought to be, an acceptable observation about agency pricing vs their offerings - variants of which, including comments about provider-appearances, good & bad, their conduct, attitude and price-points can be seen being made on the board dozens, if not hundreds of times daily. There's an enormous, longstanding and popular thread wholly dedicated to identifying and commenting on delusional and misjudged AW profiles that members say we shouldn't touch with a bargepole.
I noted there were some beauties on the Kingslover roster; criticised none of the choices made by members on-thread, and given that Stella, the lady being reviewed, does charge £250 per hour
less than this agency pitches her at us; it seemed the implicit questions I raise (viz: '
who here is paying > 80% more for other, less attractive, dames in their line-up?';
'why?', and
'how does this agency's roster qualitatively compare with what's commonly available elsewhere for far less?'), might have some direct relevance to at least some members reading this- whether they're visitors to the country who either don't care or know better, or else locals who have good reasons they may be prompted to share with us.
The overwhelming majority of my contributions are either constructive, generally benign, or else are made in the spirit of punters' general interests and concerns. I welcome and support the new, friendlier board policy you are promoting- for a long time, it erred too hard to the contrary, I assume for what were initially good or necessary reasons; not helped by all and any observations or demurrals on the then current approach, however minor, being invited to file a report to the owner, at implicit risk of being banned. As far as I can recall, I've only had cause to be directly upbraided by moderation once, long ago (I can't remember the cause - it hadn't seemed serious or a contravention of policy, but I think it nonetheless got me a temporary freeze); and you did it. I'd be very surprised and at a loss, if, after this explanation and reflection, this post was still felt to have warranted the rebuke.
I appreciate the job you do, but I think you've inadvertently got the wrong end of the stick in this instance. I hope it's ok to respectfully say that.
