Author Topic: Natasha_Ready4play - Liverpool Street - TOFTT  (Read 1626 times)


1 review(s) for XSuzieX (0 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Waterhouse]

Offline jono44

 External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Difficult one this as the cost/benefit ratio I more difficult. Had recently been spoilt in the OWO/CIM area by visits to FoxyFox, AliciaPetite. BabyAlice (though this one was luck as to who was working on the day) and -despite no cim – BiaPetite. So was looking somewhere easy and was too lazy to travel far so checked this one. CIM included. AND as duo partner is Veronica – the oralist par excellence – I though I would risk the clearly low ball cost.
Lot of body pictures. But no face. Even tried private gallery as I had freeview. No hint of face. But good body. SO asked and got a Whatsapp photo. Looked interesting.
So off. Quoted £120 for 45 mins.
Communication good.
Venue fine airb&b v close to Liverpool Street. Ring bell and let in. Room adequate with microshower room constructed in one corrner. Reasonably functional.
Lady. Pictures, particularly one sent by whatsapp showed slender attractive woman with a great body. Certainly they are of the lady in question but a least from 10 years before. No gym fit body with washboard abdominals. And face at least 10 years on from the stated 24. Bit of a disappointment ut not sukfficiently so to walk. Fluent English – English resident. Pleasant to speak to.
Given towel for shower – and it was damp – no idea who had used it before!
In summary
The good.  Multi position sex was fine. Particularly doggy – fine arse.
The not so good. The expected owo/cim. One of worst blowjobs I have experienced. It was throughout a manual wank and my attempts to take hand away worked for a few seconds then strong manual ‘stimulation’ with head in mouth resumed. Never took more than half length into mouth – and then only for a few seconds. Not really even a sensual wank. Am still sore from it. More a hard and non sensual handjob with minimal head.
In conclusion, Good for quick P&D particularly doggy. But not if you want a good blowjob with a 24 year old fit Pole.

Offline Shadow314

Thanks for the review OP  :hi:
This one had been high on my hotlist to TOFTT, but might be moving down if not the mid 20s athletic type.

Saving the current pictures (latter two weren't there when the profile first appeared)
Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only


Offline Rayray23k

Thanks for TOFT. I had her on my hot list as she says in her profile she loves the taste of cum and swallowing is a must.
Shame your experience wasn't as good as expected.

Offline mightymunce

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Difficult one this as the cost/benefit ratio I more difficult. Had recently been spoilt in the OWO/CIM area by visits to FoxyFox, AliciaPetite. BabyAlice (though this one was luck as to who was working on the day) and -despite no cim – BiaPetite. So was looking somewhere easy and was too lazy to travel far so checked this one. CIM included. AND as duo partner is Veronica – the oralist par excellence – I though I would risk the clearly low ball cost.
Lot of body pictures. But no face. Even tried private gallery as I had freeview. No hint of face. But good body. SO asked and got a Whatsapp photo. Looked interesting.
So off. Quoted £120 for 45 mins.
Communication good.
Venue fine airb&b v close to Liverpool Street. Ring bell and let in. Room adequate with microshower room constructed in one corrner. Reasonably functional.
Lady. Pictures, particularly one sent by whatsapp showed slender attractive woman with a great body. Certainly they are of the lady in question but a least from 10 years before. No gym fit body with washboard abdominals. And face at least 10 years on from the stated 24. Bit of a disappointment ut not sukfficiently so to walk. Fluent English – English resident. Pleasant to speak to.
Given towel for shower – and it was damp – no idea who had used it before!
In summary
The good.  Multi position sex was fine. Particularly doggy – fine arse.
The not so good. The expected owo/cim. One of worst blowjobs I have experienced. It was throughout a manual wank and my attempts to take hand away worked for a few seconds then strong manual ‘stimulation’ with head in mouth resumed. Never took more than half length into mouth – and then only for a few seconds. Not really even a sensual wank. Am still sore from it. More a hard and non sensual handjob with minimal head.
In conclusion, Good for quick P&D particularly doggy. But not if you want a good blowjob with a 24 year old fit Pole.

She looks like high heels honey?

Offline boofey


Offline arrow0404

also came to a similar conclusion

OP what do you think

External Link/Members Only

Works with Veronica apparently