Analise - UK Glamour Girls - Bayswater

[Momodan38]

Link - External Link/Members Only

Price - £350 for 1 hour incall

The Girl - All natural English girl. I wouldn’t go as far as to say she’s the stated age of 21, but she could pass off as being in her mid 20s.

Photos do have some filtering, but nothing out of the norm. Though she seemed a friendly enough girl, her engagement skills weren’t all there, plus she could do with some SP acting skills.

The Session - So, her feet were off limits. Also her nipples had piercings which kinda got in the way, so off the bat I felt restricted.

There really wasn’t any BJ because she was put off by the precum. I can sort of give her a pass on that, as it was an inordinate amount on the day.

Kissing was on point though. Proper DFK with plenty of tongue. If anything it rescued the whole session and made a really enjoyable one.

Also to note, she mentioned to me she doesn’t allow RO (she thought I was going for it when I wasn’t), so this could deal breaker for some.

Overall I give this a neutral. The DFK pulls this up from a negative but just barely.

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

[jakplo22]

Thanks for the review, I've been considering her.

You're generous, with those restrictions I would have given her a negative. It's not often that you get an SP who's good at kissing but bad at all the rest of it. Usually those things go hand in hand.

[KeefeD40]

Your money your choice etc but £350 for what sounds like a very restricted service is insane to me.

[Momodan38]

Thanks for the review, I've been considering her.

You're generous, with those restrictions I would have given her a negative. It's not often that you get an SP who's good at kissing but bad at all the rest of it. Usually those things go hand in hand.

Just balancing out the fact that I did enjoy the kissing as well the relative lower price compared to other girls I’ve seen from the agency, I thought a neutral was fair, IMO only.

[Jon Smith]

She looks great. It’s a shame you were restricted during your booking. The agency has some good looking girls, but for half the price of most of them, you could arrange an overnight with someone even more attractive on SeekingArrangement - what they charge for just an hour. Plus, you’d likely have a far less restrictive experience.

[delta69]

She looks great. It’s a shame you were restricted during your booking. The agency has some good looking girls, but for half the price of most of them, you could arrange an overnight with someone even more attractive on SeekingArrangement - what they charge for just an hour. Plus, you’d likely have a far less restrictive experience.

She’s on seeking arrangements however she’ll probably charge more than her escorting rates

[Jon Smith]

That's good to know, but I was actually referring to other girls more attractive on SeekingArrangements compared to her.

[bolo79bm]

Thanks OP, written as a negative for me. I saw her when she first started and got a similar experience (I think I was her second or third punt at the time). Didn't review as wanted to give her the benefit of the doubt given how new she was. Seems like she hasn't improved.

[Momodan38]

Thanks OP, written as a negative for me. I saw her when she first started and got a similar experience (I think I was her second or third punt at the time). Didn't review as wanted to give her the benefit of the doubt given how new she was. Seems like she hasn't improved.

Fair point, same as what jakplo said. It’s important to read the review rather than just check the rating.

However, I’ve made a conscious decision to make my ratings a bit more objective and statistical going forward.

[jaygg1234]

Hi Momodan38, thank you for the review, makes me want to book too. Would you be able to recall what size and height of the SP? Are the measurements accurate on UKGG? Many thanks.

[Momodan38]

Hi Momodan38, thank you for the review, makes me want to book too. Would you be able to recall what size and height of the SP? Are the measurements accurate on UKGG? Many thanks.

Umm, the review wasn’t really a glowing recommendation but fair enough if you still want to see her.

Measurements given in the UKGG profile seems about right. As for her size, you can pretty much expect her too like like her size in the pics.

Keep in mind it’s been several months since I’ve seen her, so she’s had plenty of time to change her size.

[jaygg1234]

Umm, the review wasn’t really a glowing recommendation but fair enough if you still want to see her.

Measurements given in the UKGG profile seems about right. As for her size, you can pretty much expect her too like like her size in the pics.

Keep in mind it’s been several months since I’ve seen her, so she’s had plenty of time to change her size.

Thank you for that info! I always like British SPs, but quite rare to find them with decent look/face.

[pilgrim]

Shes also here External Link/Members Only
Same price, limited services actually listed rather than vague explanations at glamour. Maxs also has some more pics