I've got a bit of a theory that the more well known a place is, the fewer reviews it gets, think people are less likely to give reviews to places where you broadly know what you're gonna get. It's the same in Leeds, there's a lot of places offering massages with extras that people must be using and barely getting any reviews, but if the information is already out there you probably don't get the same urge.
Would obviously be great if members do keep everyone up to date with latest prices and girls working, I tried to with Care Thai in Leeds lately for example. But I do sort of understand when people don't tbh. In a way, maybe it's a good sign if people haven't been rushing to say they've had a bad time and to stay away....
I think there are a number of reasons for the lack of UKP reviews, and one of these is that not all punters are members
However, i too am surprised that some establishments have hardly been mentioned at all, Upsanddowns theories are also quite valid
For my self, i see more regulars in their regular place of work than i do newbies or new places so even if i wanted to review, the rules would not allow it as there would be no significant changes
In fact i would say that the long serving leeds shops, Care, Phun Tawee, Naree, Ubon and Suranaree are often really busy but yet i bet there is no more than a hand full of reviews for the lot of them over the last 12 months
Prices wise, many regulars dont often get charged the new rates or rather the higher rates so i can understand them keeping that to themselves, but i do think the main reason is that not all punters are members