Author Topic: Emily Thai @ Miss69 - Bond Street  (Read 3309 times)


3 review(s) for Emily Thai Girl (0 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Waterhouse]

Offline SoapyTW

Comms: Easy booking process over text a few hours before the meet, and good directions and guidance on arrival

Location: Tidy flat a little north of Selfridges. Quiet street. Nice big room and bed. Clean bathroom. All good.

Girl: Emily wasn't my first choice, but the Olina girls I was hoping for weren't available. Location was good for Emily, and she looked good in the photos, so was willing to TOFTT. I suspected from the photos she might be a little older, and possibly a little tummy given the tactical arms on the photos, but still thought she looked fun. She didn't disappoint. The only real surprise was how small she is. Probably 5ft max. A very tidy package. Age wise, probably late 30's, but she does look good. Nice long blondish hair down to her bum. I was very happy.

Price: 150/h

Service: Very friendly and talkative, with a cheeky glint in her eye. Shared shower, but nothing too naughty. Straight down to business in the bedroom. Kissing was light, but her blowjob was pretty good. On request she tried throating me a few times, but she struggled. Well done for trying though. The sex was the highlight. Honestly she has one of the tightest pussies I'd been in. Either that, or she was squeezing the life out of me. She's great when on top, and amazing in doggy. She has a great waist/hip ratio, and took a hard pounding whilst I pinned head down ass up on the bed. Disappointingly she wouldn't event attempt a levels. I guess this is fair enough given both our sizes, but I'd specifically been looking for an a-level girl and confirmed in the pre booking texts. Took a so-so massage, and then a repeat of round 1 before showering together again and leaving.

Overall: I was tempted to give here a low positive, but the misrepresentation of services by the agency left me feeling a bit cheated. I'm not the smallest, but I'm not hung like a horse either. They even have a filter on their site already for 'a-level-in-1hr-booking-small-size-only', and have Kim listed who quite happily let me in (okay.... I feel offended now). If they hadn't misrepresented this, and I'd not gone in expecting it, she would have got a positive as everything else was very good.

Links: External Link/Members Only

I did spot an AW link previosuly, but I can't seem to find it now. Will add if it reappears

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: July 26, 2024, 06:51:33 pm by SoapyTW »

Offline Pleasure4ever

Thanks for TOFTT.
She looks good for late 30’s though.
I think she was only ever on Kommons and miss69 not AW?
Just looked at kommons and she’s still there.

What’s her DFK like? Reluctant or eager?
Is there any loose skin on her belly? Some pics are photoshopped to hide it?

Offline SoapyTW

What’s her DFK like? Reluctant or eager?
Is there any loose skin on her belly? Some pics are photoshopped to hide it?

Reluctant on DFK - was very light kissing.
My memory is getting hazy now. I don't think she had loose skin. i think it was more a case of a tiny belly and some stretch marks. Photos def trying to avoid showing that though

Offline bigtitslover10909

What was her body like? Big boobs and behind??

Offline londonchap

I've had the same crap from this agency where they told me a girl would/could deliver a service, and then she didn't even attempt it. I'll avoid in future.