SOPHIA DOLLAR - TOFFT - Chelsea

[chr0n0_0]

WG- SOPHIA DOLLAR

External Link/Members Only

Meet did not take place as agreed in April

Looks- olive skin with big tits and a wide arse. Body seems to be in good shape she is thick with curves and has nice features.

Comms- tried calling on a Saturday morning as I had a crappy week and wanted a shag. No answer but texted and recieved a reponse quickly. Agreed a time later in the day.

Fee- £130 ph including OWO, DT, LFK. Not too sure on extras.

Location- somewhere in Chelsea not far from South Kensington station.

The Non Action- I messaged when I was on the train and she actually said can we delay by half an hour as she was getting her nails done. No, we agreed on a time see you then. I arrive 10mins early and message her. She doesn’t say anything for 10mins. Tells me how she’s running late and she’ll be here soon. I actually end up waiting for another 15mins and then say I am leaving. At this point she video calls me when I am at a bus stop. Luckily nobody is around. I tell her what are you playing at? To which she giggles and tries acting cute. I hate time wasters so hang up. Funny enough on my way back she calls twice and messages but I say my piece to her. Cash saved for another day.

Overall negative- 0/10. Trying to hook a punter on and not being prompt on an agreed time. Would not recommend, she didn’t look as hot on video either plenty more Brazilians in the sea.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[bops909]

You've rated it as a positive ?

I don't know if you can modify your post or a forum helper has to correct it ?

[chr0n0_0]

Woops, this should definitely be a negative. If a mod can change this for me would be much appreciated.

[Iloveoral]

I’ve changed the title, could helpers not add “unavailable on arrival, did not meet” crap to titles
The first line of the review clearly states this.
It’s a title not a summary.

[LLPunting]

I’ve changed the title, could helpers not add “unavailable on arrival, did not meet” crap to titles
The first line of the review clearly states this.
It’s a title not a summary.

Sorry ILO disagree, the edit is more useful because you don't have to open the review and waste time clicking, arguably more useful than "TOFTT". If a punter is about to call her and can immediately see from the UKP subject that she's flakey they may reconsider and they won't have had to waste the extra data on a possibly slow or interrupted connection (like on a train or tube) to open the review.  Particularly if the review contains (large) image files which would consume more of someone's allowance on say a punting phone that is PAYG not an all you can eat monthly tariff or on an unmetered WiFi connection.
It's in the same vein as adding B&S or BB warnings or previously the convention to include the nationality/ethnicity of the SP in subjects, as well as the location of the punt.

[Ron89]

For me, she was poor fuck due to her bad attitude. Average body too. Money definitely saved here.

FYI, she doesn’t take advanced bookings, none of these Brazilians do. It’s first come first serve.

[bops909]

FYI, she doesn’t take advanced bookings, none of these Brazilians do. It’s first come first serve.

It might be your experience but "none" is an untrue generalization

In my experience plenty of Brazilians take advanced bookings.

I regularly book a day or more ahead, and then confirm on the day and again when setting off.

[Iloveoral]

Sorry ILO disagree, the edit is more useful because you don't have to open the review and waste time clicking, arguably more useful than "TOFTT". If a punter is about to call her and can immediately see from the UKP subject that she's flakey they may reconsider and they won't have had to waste the extra data on a possibly slow or interrupted connection (like on a train or tube) to open the review.  Particularly if the review contains (large) image files which would consume more of someone's allowance on say a punting phone that is PAYG not an all you can eat monthly tariff or on an unmetered WiFi connection.
It's in the same vein as adding B&S or BB warnings or previously the convention to include the nationality/ethnicity of the SP in subjects, as well as the location of the punt.

Not asking you to agree matey, just saying how it should be.
It’s a title let’s leave it as that please.
It’s not for helpers to decide what title the OP should have chosen.
See rule 4 of the site rules please.

[chr0n0_0]

My bad fellas, I'll be more vigilant in titles next time round 

[Iloveoral]

My bad fellas, I'll be more vigilant in titles next time round 

Sorry to read it wasn’t to be matey and a wasted time.