Author Topic: Beautiful Any - Kingston  (Read 4289 times)


2 review(s) for Beautiful Any (2 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by GingerNuts]
2 review(s) for x Naughty&Sexy x (2 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by LLPunting]

Offline Muff licker

External Link/Members Only

Any has returned to Kingston after 5 years put on some weight but still pretty and has lovely tits.
I went for a £60 -15 minute punt to test the waters but will definitely return think she is only in Kingston for a week or 2. My punt was exactly the same as my previous review here:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=240373.0

Exactly like her pictures and quiet short





Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: June 20, 2024, 05:09:16 pm by Muff licker »

Offline Ftwat26

Thank you OP. Christ, she looks amazing.... do you know if she has twitter/OF/on any other mediums? Thank you.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,356
  • Likes: 184
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Very limited likes.  Still no kissing stated at outset?

RO still available as not currently listed?
« Last Edit: June 21, 2024, 07:46:10 am by LLPunting »

Offline Muff licker

Very limited likes.  Still no kissing stated at outset?

RO still available as not currently listed?
Yes definitely RO available, we did kiss after we both recognized each other but it was only light lovely big tits carrying more weight that a few years ago but still pretty and can take a pounding doggy

Offline Muff licker

Thank you OP. Christ, she looks amazing.... do you know if she has twitter/OF/on any other mediums? Thank you.
Hi OP I really dont know about her social media side I doubt it to be honest

Offline Good-timer

Muff ... you said she would be fat when she is older... getting that way

Offline Muff licker

Muff ... you said she would be fat when she is older... getting that way
Yes mate I had my suspicions and she is starting to put the weight on which is a shame still pretty though with nice large naturals

Offline Muff licker

Who keeps changing my Heading?

I thought 28 Year old Bulgarian/Indian mix was ok ???

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,356
  • Likes: 184
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Who keeps changing my Heading?

I thought 28 Year old Bulgarian/Indian mix was ok ???

New ruling from Mods, post a comment in the Rule 4 update sticky in the UK Punting forum if they've missed a trick with their criteria.

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,500
  • Likes: 553
  •  
  • Reviews: 505
Got your report OP
Looking at the log the subject was changed by a helper inline with new rule 4

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=405790.0

Offline Muff licker

OK where did i contravene rule 4 ?
I think my heading was fair and did not contravene rule 4 please explain?

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,564
  • Likes: 731
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
OK where did i contravene rule 4 ?
I think my heading was fair and did not contravene rule 4 please explain?
"28 Year old Bulgarian/Indian mix" is a description of the escort and should be in the text of the review, not in the subject header as is the new rule.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=405790.0

Please note an update regarding rule 4, specifically the review title.

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meeting does not need to occur, and money does not need to change hands. The only criterion is that she has accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months ( for new members, this rule is currently relaxed to 12 months)after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exceptions are sex parties, duos, etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain a link, contact details or address (if publicised by the service provider).
The title of the review should only have SP Name - Location - (b&s / toftt label if needed), and there are no abbreviations of establishments in the title of a review.

Please can we keep a standard format for review titles (as above), rather than them being updated by helpers that feel it should have more of a description about the meet than the OP originally issued.

We don’t need a summary of the review as a title, that’s what the body of the review is for, thanks guys  :drinks:

Offline bhudda

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,402
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
popped to see her today, she is very cute despite a little extra poundage, and seems willing to suck for as long as it takes


Offline Cee92

I disagree with the assertion that Any is somewhat attractive. I went to try her out yesterday off the strength of this review but walked. From what i saw she is short and dumpy, rough facially and has the voice of someone who smokes 5 packs a day. Not calling you out tho OP. It is undoubtedly a case of different strokes for different folks. Still i thought i should provide my perspective for those who might fancy making the trip to the baron punting wasteland that is Kingston Upon Thames  :D

Offline Muff licker

Ok op I don't agree with you but we all have different tastes, I see you have had a lot of negative reviews in your short punting life
At least you walked on Any and did not waste yore money but visited another girl and had another bad punt.  On wards and upwards  :hi: