Author Topic: Kim - Canning Town - London (Revisit)  (Read 1728 times)

Offline SimonSays2108

External Link/Members Only

A return to Kim at the turn of the year as i happened to be in the area - location / price / etc. as per my prior review - I still think she's hot, slightly bigger than photos might suggest but not fat at all.

Just for reference - £110 / hr / 2 finishes - 1st in the shower (assisted) and 2nd as part of the massage.

What changed this time was that during the massage half we ended up in a sort of 69 position and RO was available - she seemed to be enjoying it and once done mentioned that it should be an extra and she also provides kissing - as i only had the usual fare with me the point was made but she let it go - i didn't query the cost but said 'next time' ... she was v. clear that she does not provide full service and she enjoys the extras so 'why not'.

I'd actually fancy a return for kissing - RO was for her so not fussed - OW / OWO would change my plans to be more urgent but if i find myself in the area i might return ...

Online Duron

Boob size only slightly evident on the photo. Can you offer a more descriptive assessment?

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,596
  • Likes: 130
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
Boob size only slightly evident on the photo. Can you offer a more descriptive assessment?

Check out his first review of her.

Offline SimonSays2108

They are large and firm - DD? -  i assume fake but v. natural look - she knows they are a key feature and uses them well during the massage incl. in your face ... didn't mind sucking either.

Tbh if she did full service i would be there in a shot - v. curvy, womanly body - not fat .. she's bigger than the photos but still v. hot.