Author Topic: London/Sexy-Sparkle-BBW, Aldgate (touring)  (Read 3340 times)


13 review(s) for Sparkle-BBW (11 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by GingerNuts]

Offline ShadowProclamation

I had some holiday leave coming up and I decided to visit London. I am aware of the amount of UKP reviews, added daily, for the London region. I was up for some action, in a city with plenty of choice. I found this touring escort, whose London tour coincided with my holiday. She ticked many boxes for me, so I decided to contact her. On her AdultWork profile she requests details of your build and what you would most like from a booking. This was met with a pleasing response, so I swiftly fired off a one hour booking request.

Just as I was arriving into London, my mobile indicated that I had received an email via AdultWork. I clicked on the link, only to discover that I can’t access this website on my mobile! I then texted her explaining the situation and requested she switch to SMS. She replied, ‘I’m Sparkle’. (Clearly confused). I sent her a second text, saying who I was and attached a photo of the AdultWork booking form. (I later discovered that this had failed to send. Was it a technical glitch? Or was it blocked?) I rang her, once I was in my hotel room. The phone rang for ages, with no answer, so I had to leave a voicemail message. I suggested she texted me details of her hotel. This received no response. I felt my comms were being firewalled.

Next day, on the day of the booking, I decided the ball was in her court. My booking form stated to contact me between 9am and midday (the time of my booking). During the three hours I received a Gmail message from AdultWork (at 10.20). Except I couldn’t access it! :dash: If I’m going to break into a hotel, then I’m relying on an escort to start using her SMS!

In the evening, I received a further Gmail message, saying that I had received a rating on AdultWork. (I knew that it wouldn’t be positive).

Once I got home, I was able to fill in the missing gaps, once I’d logged into my AdultWork account. One message requested that I meet 15 minutes later than agreed. Not a good sign. Upon arrival, it would probably have turned into a further 15 minutes delay. What else would have changed? Services offered? Costs? I emailed her to explain what had happened. I apologised and offered to pay for access to her private gallery, for 24 hours, which I did. (I received no follow-up response from her).

Was there just a breakdown in communications? Or, was it down to an escort going through the motions, but trying to make a meeting not happen? If a text and a voicemail message got through, then it would have been easy to match up my mobile number, with the one on the booking form. What was stopping her from texting or ringing me up?

As the meeting didn’t take place, she left me a negative rating. :dash: (I wrote a dispute statement in response). Such a rating does not make me happy. It makes it harder to secure future bookings. It only seems fair that I reciprocate, by giving her a negative rating.

Offline AffAlchemist

To be fair to the SP id say this is your issue
Comms were via AW and just because you couldn't access it (your issue) then moaning about "could've changed prices, services etc" that's all speculation
Take it on the chin, you fucked up

Offline ShadowProclamation

For previous AdultWork bookings, I've started with an email. Then filled out a booking form. The rest has always been finalized by texts and phone calls.

Offline ShadowProclamation

On her profile she states that if you want to book me on the day, please call or message me to avoid me missing your email. She can use SMS when she chooses to. Perhaps if I had just rung her on the day, I might have got a booking sorted? To be kinder to the SP, she has a lot of positives on here. Just be aware that she might be selective about which contact methods she uses.

Her AdultWork link is:- External Link/Members Only

Offline Uk765

This one has shown up touring, in my area, twice in the last month.

But like OP states, non-exsistent.. bordering on almost disrespectful with her comms. She'd be fuming with timewasters, yet it seems to be a big part of her service. I've blacklisted

Offline ShadowProclamation

I feel vindicated reading this. I have never known an SP to stick rigidly to messaging via AdultWork. If they are sat in a hotel room for three days, they have plenty of opportunity to send a text or make a phone call in order to finalize a booking. If someone has travelled a long way, like I did, then they should be bending over backwards to make it happen. As stated, SPs hate us timewasting. By giving me a negative, she essentially accused me of being one. I didn't travel 200 miles to be a timewaster.

Since I tried to book her, one punter has commented on her AdultWork ratings, "What a waste of time. The lady doesn't even reply back. Ignore this one....". Her response was, "Unfortunately this gentleman made contact with me whist I was otherwise engaged". So in a 24 hour period, she has no time window of opportunity to follow up a potential booking with a punter?

I also noticed that her heavily marketed anal service is now listed as being at discretion. So if she can't be arsed (so to speak) on the day, then that usp is not happening.





Offline TallnHung

I've met her a few times.
All contact has been by text and very civil.
Seems to me you fucked up the AW route, then muddied the waters with more pissing around and in my head I would have thought you weren't genuine too maybe?

No intention to make excuses here but you didn't exactly make it easy did you?

Online scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,643
  • Likes: 534
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
OP, you fucked up the comms but in my view you should regard yourself as lucky.
I know "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" and all that philosophical crap but I reckon her ghosting you is the best thing that could have happened. Assuming the photos are accurate you've been saved from a fatty fuggly.
« Last Edit: March 02, 2024, 02:51:15 pm by scutty brown »