Pigeon Mode - Leicester Square - Good but won’t return

[Makaveli123]

Meet happened in December in Leicester Sq.Paid £150 for 30 mins

Comms: Hard to get hold of initially but once she makes contact she’s keeps you updated and will reply to messages.

She’s a young pretty girl (22-23 seems about right). Some people are dissapointed by her looks but I thought she was fit. Unbelievable body, one of the best if not the best I’ve seen.

Once I got in she was welcoming and chatty, as others mentioned she likes to know your sexual history (must be her go to ice breaker). She then sent me off to the shower and got down to action once I was back. Amazing blowjob skills, takes it very deep. She kisses, but not very deep which was bit of a shame. Very clean and VERY responsive to oral - happy for you to use a finger.

Now for the reason why I won’t be returning. After some amazing fourplay I put the condom on. About 30 secs to a minute into sex her phone alarm went off (times up). She told me to finish up as it had already been 30 mins. I couldn’t believe it, only felt like 15. I wasn’t going to argue of course so I finished,  cleaned up and went on my way. Once I left I realised it had been 30 mins, but 30mins from when I walked into the door, she starts it that soon! Lol. The shower and small talk chit chat took up a while so there’s hardly any time left to really enjoy a good sesh. I can’t really blame her tbh - if that’s the way she operates then fair enough, it’s a tough job after all, but I don’t really see the VFM at £150 even though her skills are great. All a bit by the book.

She’s great in bed hence why it’s a positive, but if u do decide to see her, have a quick shower and don’t get lost in the small talk because it all adds up. Glad I finally got to see what the hype was about though. On to the next one for which I’ll keep you updated. Happy new year of punting

 External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only+

[Steely Dan]

Thanks for the review.

I know the rule is your review, your rating.  But one of the guidance comments to rating (based on broad consensus), is: if you won't repeat, then consider a neutral or negative.  You wont go back.  But you want us to go see her.

On the flip side it is not clear why you won't go back. You made a 30 min booking (Wham, bam, thank you ma'am) but then spent your time chatting and showering and playing.  By your own admission, she did not short change you on time at all.  So maybe you did land on the right rating. Sort of.  But if you won't go back (having met her), why do you think that I and the other 500 punters who might read this should pay our hard earned dosh on her?  You wont try again for a better managed 30min?  Or pay a tad more and book 60?

Anyway, thank you for your honesty.  This helps punters.  But if you are going to book 30 min (from any escort), may I suggest you learn to manage your time?  Or better still, enjoy yourself in 2024 and book 60 or 90 minutes.  YOLO.

External Link/Members Only

[jkandjol]

Steely, think outside the box.

He's saying he ain't going back cos he don't wanna fall foul of the accusation that this review is a mitigation job to curry favour with her in light of my hot off the press neg and other comments 

[SoapyTW]

... one of the guidance comments to rating (based on broad consensus), is: if you won't repeat, then consider a neutral or negative.  You wont go back.  But you want us to go see her.

Dont see an issue with a +ve if OP enjoyed themselves. Some punters enjoy the variety and have zero interest in repeat visits regardless of how good the girl is. Would be problematic to follow the above guidance in that situation. Each to their own and all that.

Thanks for review OP

Edit: All that said tho, I just noticed OP has been happy to consider a return to another WG. I'm still fine with the +ve tho. I get the fun times + no return bucket

[patelprat]

I hate it when SPs use audible alarms.
Makes it feel too transactional, kills the mood especially if it's supposed to be a GFE. I do understand SPs need to stick to schedule though.

There are more subtle ways SPs can employ to hurry things up without an actual alarm.

Quality SPs don't use an alarm.

[jamiekinkxxx]

I don't see why a review has to be a neutral or negative if you state that you would not to want to go back even if you had a good time.

There could be umpteen reasons that have zero to do with the service level of the provider that was categorised as a positive.

If that is the guidance I personally feel it is flawed, but maybe if you do state you would not go back you should state the reason 

[jamiekinkxxx]

I hate it when SPs use audible alarms.
Makes it feel too transactional, kills the mood especially if it's supposed to be a GFE. I do understand SPs need to stick to schedule though.

There are more subtle ways SPs can employ to hurry things up without an actual alarm.

Quality SPs don't use an alarm.

+1

[Steely Dan]

Some punters enjoy the variety and have zero interest in repeat visits regardless of how good the girl is. Would be problematic to follow the above guidance in that situation.

The ratings discussion on PW is meant to be helpful, not restrictive. It is a summary of several lengthy threads. It goes without saying that guys who just choose not to repeat can give positive reviews to positive experiences. That was mentioned by several punters on the linked threads.

As you point out, anyway, the OP does not have a personal rule of never repeating.  He just won't see this one again, but thinks you and I should.  Do as I say, not as I do.  The mindset reviewers should have is to outline their experience, not to mind read others punters.  If I hate fake boobs and rate her neutral since she had fake boobs, I am rating my experience and preferences.  Any reader can decide to see her anyway since they are happy with fake boobs. It is not my job to rate her positive since I think others wont mind.  I rate my punt, not anyone else's.

He can give a positive, sure.  And I can post the slight illogic of it, also. 

[patelprat]

But you want us to go see her.

I don't think the OP explicitly said this.
He had a positive experience with reservations re the alarm and it's left up to the reader to decide whether he would see her based on all that.

[Steely Dan]

I don't see why a review has to be a neutral or negative if you state that you would not to want to go back even if you had a good time.

There could be umpteen reasons that have zero to do with the service level of the provider that was categorised as a positive.

If that is the guidance I personally feel it is flawed, but maybe if you do state you would not go back you should state the reason 

Actually, I agree with you.  Your comment is in line with the many many punters who helped create the guidance.  It is about stating the reason.  I'm struggling to see the reason the OP gave a pos.  I also agree with you the alarm is shit.  But the OP forgave that too it seems.   

[Steely Dan]

I don't think the OP said this. ('But you want us to go see her.')

He said it with his rating:

Give a positive rating if you want to unequivocally recommend the provider to other punters.

External Link/Members Only

He had a positive experience with reservations and it's left up to the reader to decide whether he would see her based on that.

Agree it is for us to figure out.

[patelprat]

He said it with his rating: Agree it is for us to figure out.

I see.

It's a strict definition IMO, as positives alway have caveats (which I always state in my review when I write the recommendation).
For example, I have marked many vanilla GFE providers as positive, but the recommendation is for those good with just vanilla GFE as I know PSE and hardcore seekers probably wouldn't enjoy.

And in this case, those averse to annoying alarms going off near the end (like me) also may not enjoy 

[Fuzzyduck]

I think it's a very good review. He enjoyed it enough to give it a positive and called out the downsides. In the subject line, he invites the reader to explore further than looking at the rating. He also suggests ways of making the most of a visit for interested punters. Reading the review, I can imagine giving a neutral rating myself, but I wasn't in the room.

[Makaveli123]

I enjoyed the punt, the action was great hence why it’s a positive…the strict time keeping is enough for me to not go back. No need to think ‘outside of the box’ when reading it as someone claimed. It’s an honest account of my experience. Someone will see her and have a great time - fact. My one time was enough considering the money spent

[jkandjol]

No need to think ‘outside of the box’ when reading it as someone claimed.

You dropped a review from your punt "in December" shortly after my negative review which prompted further negative comments from other members. Those members haven't even had the time or effort to share their NEGATIVE reviews yet. You on the other hand..

You countered numerous negative points made by me and others on here. Almost in an op-ed style rather than just doing your own review. This has been called out over the years - punters who seem to write their reviews to counter others, rather than simply talk about their experience. Any seasoned punter or forum member will see the lines in your review I am talking about there.




You then asterisk your glowing review with a sole negative claiming it will make you not return, when the issue was very much your fault/of no negative reflection of the WG in truth. My opinion is you're playing 3D chess and did this on purpose.
................................
I'll let everyone make their own opinion of this.

[Makaveli123]

You dropped a review from your punt "in December" shortly after my negative review which prompted further negative comments from other members. Those members haven't even had the time or effort to share their NEGATIVE reviews yet. You on the other hand..

You countered numerous negative points made by me and others on here. Almost in an op-ed style rather than just doing your own review. This has been called out over the years - punters who seem to write their reviews to counter others, rather than simply talk about their experience. Any seasoned punter or forum member will see the lines in your review I am talking about there.




You then asterisk your glowing review with a sole negative claiming it will make you not return, when the issue was very much your fault/of no negative reflection of the WG in truth. My opinion is you're playing 3D chess and did this on purpose.
................................
I'll let everyone make their own opinion of this.

Of all the dumb things I’ve read on the net, this has to be right up there. I didn’t even read your review prior to posting mine - nor was I aware of it before you started championing it in this thread. Please everyone read it, he put a lot of effort into it im sure.

My reviews are generally all the same if you want to have a butchers, I generally talk about how I attractive I find them, cleanliness, if they’re nice and how good of a time I had. I took full responsibility for time keeping at it was a rooky mistake, it’s just all a bit by the book and I like a bit more chill. Phone alarms are the ultimate form of clock watching imo. That’s enough for me not to want to go back. End of. No 3d chess mate. (I still haven’t got a clue as to what I would achieve with this alleged 3D chess btw) I had a good time but my readies will be spent better elsewhere. Could have been a neutral but that’s just my personality, thought it was a bit harsh. Latina Ina could have been a neutral too but maybe I’m a bit more generous in my assessments. We’re all adults and don’t need to agree on everything.

Maybe you’re projecting I don’t know? But anyways im happy to take advice from the forum helpers, one suggested only a positive if you’d go back; something I’ll most certainly consider in future reviews. But mate nobody likes a jobsworth, you’re a grown man not teachers pet.

And if I wanted to keep the WG in my good books, I’d talk about how I’m definitely returning in the future, she’s got enough positives where it wouldn’t look off. Puff piece - do me a favour.

Anyways happy Friday boys 

[jkandjol]

She’s a young pretty girl (22-23 seems about right). Some people are dissapointed by her looks but I thought she was fit. Unbelievable body, one of the best if not the best I’ve seen.

I just skimmed your index. Not once do you ever reference other reviews. But you do here.
Naughtyalice has a lot of mixed feedback on her look, I remember one even made a jibe about pierogi (it put me off her at the time), eating too much  , IIRC. That didn't prompt any influence on your review. She doesn't look anything like Sofi Ryan in body or face BTW, but it's good you did your own review and not a retort then.
Likewise Latina Ina seemed to have mixed calls on how hot she is and even what races she resembles IIRC. No impact on your review. Lola Wild has a extensive jury out on her face and the only comment you make on her looks are basically meh too tall and gangly.


If I was a "jobsworth" I would have reported your review. Or pressed for an admin to reveal what reviews you read, if any, in the lead up to posting. I just said my piece. Effort, no. It's one of 49 reviews I've done in 6 months. Youve done 7 in years. Was very motivated to quickly ("December") knock out a positive review for this WG you don't ever want to see again though. All the other points you make are already explained TBH.

I'll let everyone make their own opinion of this.

Have a good Friday, Niccolo   

[if33lsosl33py]

Of all the dumb things I’ve read on the net, this has to be right up there. I didn’t even read your review prior to posting mine - nor was I aware of it before you started championing it in this thread. Please everyone read it, he put a lot of effort into it im sure.

My reviews are generally all the same if you want to have a butchers, I generally talk about how I attractive I find them, cleanliness, if they’re nice and how good of a time I had. I took full responsibility for time keeping at it was a rooky mistake, it’s just all a bit by the book and I like a bit more chill. Phone alarms are the ultimate form of clock watching imo. That’s enough for me not to want to go back. End of. No 3d chess mate. (I still haven’t got a clue as to what I would achieve with this alleged 3D chess btw) I had a good time but my readies will be spent better elsewhere. Could have been a neutral but that’s just my personality, thought it was a bit harsh. Latina Ina could have been a neutral too but maybe I’m a bit more generous in my assessments. We’re all adults and don’t need to agree on everything.

Maybe you’re projecting I don’t know? But anyways im happy to take advice from the forum helpers, one suggested only a positive if you’d go back; something I’ll most certainly consider in future reviews. But mate nobody likes a jobsworth, you’re a grown man not teachers pet.

And if I wanted to keep the WG in my good books, I’d talk about how I’m definitely returning in the future, she’s got enough positives where it wouldn’t look off. Puff piece - do me a favour.

Anyways happy Friday boys 

  thanks for the review mate
And thanks for this read some people take this shit to serious
Have a Good Friday bro

[Makaveli123]

  thanks for the review mate
And thanks for this read some people take this shit to serious
Have a Good Friday bro

Top man have a good weekend bruv!

[gurds]

Seems strange, how can she look so good when quite a few others that saw her didn't find her good looking

[MLawro93]

Seems strange, how can she look so good when quite a few others that saw her didn't find her good looking

Because what you find attractive, others might not?  We are allowed to disagree with each other, nothing strange about that.

[Makaveli123]

Because what you find attractive, others might not?  We are allowed to disagree with each other, nothing strange about that.

Nah mate common sense doesn’t go well with some on here, it’s all part of this big 3d chess move I’ve planned to impress a brass I’m never going to see again