Posting a Review after the SP has retired

[petermisc]

Recent review posted by someone who has seen an SP multiple times, over what appears to be a significant period, but waited until he thought the SP had retired back home overseas for good before posting a review.    The review is of no use whatsoever to anyone else.  He even admits he only posted it to up his review count.  I haven't reported it as, as far as I can see, he hasn't broken any of the rules.  Should there be a rule against this kind of thing?

[Murray Mint]

Recent review posted by someone who has seen an SP multiple times, over what appears to be a significant period, but waited until he thought the SP had retired back home overseas for good before posting a review.    The review is of no use whatsoever to anyone else.  He even admits he only posted it to up his review count. I haven't reported it as, as far as I can see, he hasn't broken any of the rules.  Should there be a rule against this kind of thing?

So, what's to report? Any 'rule.' as you suggest would be totally unenforceable. Sure, he was a bit silly to declare that he posted the review after she'd retired, but other than that, loads of reviews pop up only to find, when you search out the SP, that she's retired.

[jamiekinkxxx]

Not sure whether there should be a rule? Guess that is up to the Mods and Head1 to decide.

I have reported the post/review in that it should be in the massage section as the SP does NOT offer FS. She may have provided to the the reviewer but that is not an offered service. We know that such reviews would just get potential guys trying to persuade her to offer it to them too (yes she may not still be in London, BUT she is clearly still working), which IMHO would be out of order! But we all know such reviews can be a red rag to bulls!

[scutty brown]

So which review are you talking about?
Without identifying it this is just pointless hot air

[Waterhouse]

So which review are you talking about?
Without identifying it this is just pointless hot air

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=388652.0

[scutty brown]

this conversation would have been better posted on that thread, where there are already relevant comments

[petermisc]

this conversation would have been better posted on that thread, where there are already relevant comments

But then no-one is going to see the discussion unless that particular review grabs their interest.  I was trying to raise this as a general issue, of someone posting a useless review purely for their own benefit, rather than discuss that particular case.

[simon07]

I would agree and add left a location.
For example someone posted a review in East England today for a WG he saw 2 months ago in Hatfield. Of course she is no longer there as rotating gals are around for only one or maybe 2 weeks.

It is good as far as developing a profile of WG over time and useless if one was trying to catch the gal before she leaves.

[Munter84]

All reviews are in principle useful. Retired girls can come out of retirement, girls on tour can return to a location.

If a reviewer made a point of keeping a girl his personal secret and only reviewed after she had departed - well, that's arguably poor form, but I think the above still applies.

[WelshClipper]

Happened to me a couple of times, mostly with foreign girls where they go “on holiday” days after I saw them.

Nothing to be done in that situation. The way I see it, if the review is written well, it still has entertainment value.

Bring ‘em on