Veronica69_a or Busty-British-Chloe?

[888]

Has anyone seen both of these girls? Planning on making one of them my next punt but can’t decide which! Chloe doesn’t offer A-levels and is a little bit more pricey, but neither are deal breakers. Would like to know how they copare in terms of service, attitude and facially.

Thank you.


Chloe
External Link/Members Only

Veronica
External Link/Members Only

[arrow0404]

A simple check on here would have given you what you need to know - both girls are well reviewed

[888]

You are correct to a certain extent, but I am asking specifically if anyone is in a position to compare them having seen both.

Thanks for taking the time to respond though - does that mean you’ve seen one/both of them? Didn’t see them in your reviews.

[PilotMan]

Veronica is hard to get in communication with, so you might be better trying Chloe first.

[Brand242]

I’ve seen them both OP - Veronica a couple of times and Chloe once at Maxes. Both before I joined this site so don’t think I reviewed, but reading more recent reviews it sounds like they are on form as they were back then.

It’s an interesting selection you have as both are different positive experiences when i compare.

If you’re looking for anal…only one option (Veronica)
I assume you’re ok with the extras that Veronica charges?
Chloe is more of my type (better looking / stunning body in my opinion), but I saw Veronica before she got her boob job.
Chloe was very good at role play (good range of outfits) and I recall her rimming was great (one of the best I’ve had). Although Veronica was a solid rimmer too.
Both took facials well, but Chloe got more into it when we met, submissive cumplay etc…Veronica was definitely more mechanical, but took it well.
Veronica’s DT / FF is legendary so better than Chloe in that department, but Chloe’a DT / FF was great too. Very wet, drool, submissive.

So:
Veronica: memorable DT / FF and anal (and a duo as 2nd time I saw he was with someone else)
Chloe: memorable DT / FF / rimming / pse submissive role play / open minded

I’d see both again. Probably Chloe first from reading recent reviews as she matches more of what I’m currently after.

Overall, you’ll likely have a good time with either, so my recommendations is to go with which provider fits the services you’re after (and your looks preference too, if a deciding factor).

Have fun!

[888]

I’ve seen them both OP - Veronica a couple of times and Chloe once at Maxes. Both before I joined this site so don’t think I reviewed, but reading more recent reviews it sounds like they are on form as they were back then.

It’s an interesting selection you have as both are different positive experiences when i compare.

If you’re looking for anal…only one option (Veronica)
I assume you’re ok with the extras that Veronica charges?
Chloe is more of my type (better looking / stunning body in my opinion), but I saw Veronica before she got her boob job.
Chloe was very good at role play (good range of outfits) and I recall her rimming was great (one of the best I’ve had). Although Veronica was a solid rimmer too.
Both took facials well, but Chloe got more into it when we met, submissive cumplay etc…Veronica was definitely more mechanical, but took it well.
Veronica’s DT / FF is legendary so better than Chloe in that department, but Chloe’a DT / FF was great too. Very wet, drool, submissive.

So:
Veronica: memorable DT / FF and anal (and a duo as 2nd time I saw he was with someone else)
Chloe: memorable DT / FF / rimming / pse submissive role play / open minded

I’d see both again. Probably Chloe first from reading recent reviews as she matches more of what I’m currently after.

Overall, you’ll likely have a good time with either, so my recommendations is to go with which provider fits the services you’re after (and your looks preference too, if a deciding factor).

Have fun!

Thank you - exactly what I was looking for.

[a203203]

seen chloe twice, but never went back to see veronica..

[PilotMan]

seen chloe twice, but never went back to see veronica..

I couldn't find your review of her?

[alabama1]

I couldn't find your review of her?

Members are not obliged to review every punt. 

[PilotMan]

Members are not obliged to review every punt. 

Did I say that he was?

[alabama1]

Did I say that he was?

You sarcastically implied it

[PilotMan]

Members are not obliged to review every punt. 

It's about context.

888 asked about two specific SP's.

Brand242 replied and gave an excellent comparison between them.

a203203 replied and said he has seen BBC twice and V69 once and wouldn't go back. He offers no further context or explanation for his reason. Naturally, one would want to look at his reviews of said SP's to get more context. He has reviewed BBC, but not V69.

[alabama1]

It's about context.

888 asked about two specific SP's.

Brand242 replied and gave an excellent comparison between them.

a203203 replied and said he has seen BBC twice and V69 once and wouldn't go back. He offers no further context or explanation for his reason. Naturally, one would want to look at his reviews of said SP's to get more context. He has reviewed BBC, but not V69.

I couldn't find your review of her?

You have been here long enough to know that if you 'couldn't find it', it means he hasn't reviewed her !

[PilotMan]

I couldn't find your review of her?

You have been here long enough to know that if you 'couldn't find it', it means he hasn't reviewed her !

Double entendre 

[Fuzzyduck]

Double entendre 

Such subtleties are lost on our friend.

[a203203]

Members are not obliged to review every punt. 

it wasnt memorable enough to review... didnt find her that hot unfortunately.

[pepsicolaboy]

Chloe
External Link/Members Only

I am sure she was £200 for 30 mins and now hiked to £250 

[jamiekinkxxx]

it wasnt memorable enough to review... didnt find her that hot unfortunately.

Surely such a lacklustre meeting would have benefited from at least a short neutral or negative review?

[a203203]

As I said it was because I didn’t find her hot, which is purely subjective. Doesn’t warrant a negative review. And if I had written a short one, no doubt various members would then be asking me to provide more details etc. Thus, all the better not to write one.

[bluegene]

I met both and would re-visit either. It all depends what you're looking for.

Veronica offer DT and anal. Chloe has a much better body, enthusiastic service and you can talk to.

[deg_dilemma]

The price difference is huge: £170 for Veronica versus a ridiculous £300 for Chloe. That alone means you can get 2 sessions with Veronica for almost the same as one with Chloe.

[jamiekinkxxx]

The price difference is huge: £170 for Veronica versus a ridiculous £300 for Chloe. That alone means you can get 2 sessions with Veronica for almost the same as one with Chloe.

Nothing ridiculous about C’s prices in London give. Her excellent feedback, looks, service and the fact she is British.

[Malvolio]

I met both and would re-visit either. It all depends what you're looking for.

Veronica offer DT and anal. Chloe has a much better body, enthusiastic service and you can talk to.

Not seen Chloe (and don't intend to at those prices), but if her OWO is more enthusiastic than Veronica's that would be one hell of a service.

[pepsicolaboy]

Nothing ridiculous about C’s prices in London give. Her excellent feedback, looks, service and the fact she is British.

I think he means the price sitting there in isolation is high, which I agree (not in comparison to what many Brits charge/ get away with) and yes london prices are high as well with some SP.

Consider the fact they pay a room rate, rental or hotel rate, she charges £300 for 1 hour, unless she is a Penthouse room or Presidential suite (and usually these SP are canny and hunt around for cheap prices) she has in theory paid completely for her room for the day (possibly 2 or 3 days) in just a 1 hour booking.

You not getting A-levels for that, maybe rimming?) and her DT. However photos do indicate she is a looker. Like many Ex-Maxes they can hang on the coat tails of how good the agency ONCE was and also use that as reason to charge extra IMO.

Edit: I love the zero discount/enticement to book multiple hours 

Reviews seem solid on here so far, would not take AW reviews too seriously.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=31313

So Prices can be HIGH in a gent's opnion, even though comparitively for other British SP they are on par.

 

[hendrix]

The price difference is huge: £170 for Veronica versus a ridiculous £300 for Chloe. That alone means you can get 2 sessions with Veronica for almost the same as one with Chloe.

All depends on what you value. I wouldn't pay £70 for Veronica.

[Brand242]

The price difference is huge: £170 for Veronica versus a ridiculous £300 for Chloe. That alone means you can get 2 sessions with Veronica for almost the same as one with Chloe.

Don’t forget about extras. Veronica has a long extras list…if you are going for a “like for like” service list, then you are looking at £230 for V and £300 for C.

There was the comment about no multiple hour discounts for C, but v’s 2hr rate is weird. I guess she is looking for shorter meets.

[pepsicolaboy]

Don’t forget about extras. Veronica has a long extras list…if you are going for a “like for like” service list, then you are looking at £230 for V and £300 for C.

There was the comment about no multiple hour discounts for C, but v’s 2hr rate is weird. I guess she is looking for shorter meets.

I don’t know about either of these SP and their policies but many SP prefer shorter bookings so they can back to back and also if its a come once (or twice) policy, I imagine lots gents will finish long before the allotted time...effectively ending the session.

Some better SP might not have the restricted come policy, or if they do (hopefully) massage the client after  and not short change them on time

But saying that many gents feel they want to leave ASAP after climax (particularly if its restrictive cum policy) & SP know this! hence they prefer shorter bookings of say 1hour to maximize their returns vs effort & time IMO.

[jamiekinkxxx]

I don’t know about either of these SP and their policies but many SP prefer shorter bookings so they can back to back and also if its a come once (or twice) policy, I imagine lots gents will finish long before the allotted time...effectively ending the session.

Some better SP might not have the restricted come policy, or if they do (hopefully) massage the client after  and not short change them on time

But saying that many gents feel they want to leave ASAP after climax (particularly if its restrictive cum policy) & SP know this! hence they prefer shorter bookings of say 1hour to maximize their returns vs effort & time IMO.

For every girl that you mention above I would imagine there are others who much prefer longer bookings, even at slightly cheaper rates per hour the longer you book. I think the girls that you mention are here for short time and may be looking to max earning potential. For some girls, and 100% ones that are not P&D quality, I think they may weigh mental health v back to back bookings v quality over quantity. Longer booking (2+hours) are in no way full on for every minute unlike shorter bookings (1hr and less).

[pepsicolaboy]

For every girl that you mention above I would imagine there are others who much prefer longer bookings, even at slightly cheaper rates per hour the longer you book. I think the girls that you mention are here for short time and may be looking to max earning potential. For some girls, and 100% ones that are not P&D quality, I think they may weigh mental health v back to back bookings v quality over quantity. Longer booking (2+hours) are in no way full on for every minute unlike shorter bookings (1hr and less).

Agreed

So in that case Chloe & Veronica appear to be favouring shorter visits/prefering?  as they offer little to no (in fact sometimes more expensive eg Vernonica's 2 hour rate ) enticement for multiple hour:

Chloe
30 mins 250
1 hour 300
1.5 hour 500
2 hour 600 - pro rata 300 ph
3 hour 900 - pro rata 300 ph
4 hour 1200 - pro rata 300 ph

Veronica
30 mins 90
45 mins 130
1 hour 170
1.5 hour 280
2 hour 360 - pro rata 180 ph
3 hour 500 - pro rate 166.66 ph
4 hour 700 - pro rate 175 ph

I agree with other poster, Veronica using some very strange rates

[jamiekinkxxx]

I agree with other poster, Veronica using some very strange rates

Probably just bad at maths?! 

[Soho_upstart]

Not seen Chloe so can’t comment but Veronica is fine facially and is legendary in the DT department - plus takes a good facial and loves anal, did the trick for me.

[Stevelondon]

It would probably be a mathematical decision on my part. If choosing between the two that is.  Or at least a big part of my decision making.
I like the look of both to be honest and it’s nice to actually see one of them allows her face to be seen.

Not a huge of fan of this idea that “Because I’m British I can charge more”

I knows it’s there but I’ve seen enough foreigners to know that good service isn’t better just cos of your nationality.

[kidpoontang]

Is Chloe's pussy an innie or does she have large labia / half a pound of chopped liver?

[jamiekinkxxx]

Is Chloe's pussy an innie or does she have large labia / half a pound of chopped liver?

WTF is that sort of question? 

[pepsicolaboy]

Is Chloe's pussy an innie or does she have large labia / half a pound of chopped liver?