Emily_Darcy - Nottingham

[kippydon]

 This meet  took place over a month a go in Nottingham,   and just getting round to writing a review

 £170 for one hour


Location:
A well known Hotel Chain , in Nottingham,  phoenix Park. The room was clean, comfortable and smoke free. . The room was in the Annex which i asked for , so need to go thorough reception if people are worried
Score: 10/10

Communication:
Emily  was very good  at communication. As with most girls, all messages were answered , even though sometimes it took time,like with most popular WG they are very busy  as  it .
Score: 8/10

Appearance / Physical aspects:
Emily  is stunning the lady . Slim, curvy, her hair colour now changed and is a brunette has a great arse  and nice enhanced  boobs. Facially I found Emily really pretty,  Emily looked very sexy in her matching  lingerie, suspenders and heels . Age and pictures are accurate in my eye.
Score: 9/10.

Personality:
Emily was very friendly and was easy to talk too and for first timers would put you at ease  very easy going , down to earth and had a great sense of humor 

Score: 10/10

Services: Everything  was provided as was advertised, and in the best possible way and with utmost enthusiasm. Emily is someone who knows how to please and also likes to receive too, great company and lots of fun was had
Score: 10/10

Encounter:
Looking at recent review , not sure why  Emily was given a negative , but i found Emily to be very sexy and the services she gave was  very good, one of the best in my eyes

I had already checked in the hotel and had shower and was  waiting for Emily to arrive at the specified time , Emily was arrived on time , no issues with finding room, as was in annex , no passing through reception. Emily called when she had arrived and signposted to room,

Started of  chatting a little , getting to know each other , had a glass of wine and then on to main event, paperwork sorted , Emily knows how to kiss, plenty of DFK, loads of tongue  , was very sloppy and  felt great  and deep,  one of the best i have had

Besides the kissing, there was excellent OWO and  Emily tried  deep throat,  and it was great, i would say i am not small or big, average really and was a great feeling, then we had plenty of reverse oral and plenty of oral on her , great sounds were coming from Emily, so obviously doing something right Lol, , Emily became very wet very quickly, think she came a few times , by the noise and shuddering  . 
Had sex in different positions and hour went by so quickly , it was a great first meet and would definitely seeing her again

Score: 10/10

Conclusion:
The meet was great with a very friendly , sexy  great person and guys would recommend Emily ,  she is down right filthy and easy to get on with , she is definitely a great fuck

External Link/Members Only

[Puntingutils]

I was the one who gave the negative, and I stand by it. You can re-read my report why the negative was given. is interesting that you chosen to give a very detailed review of this particular SP when you lacked detail in the past

[Night-Owl]

I was the one who gave the negative, and I stand by it. You can re-read my report why the negative was given. is interesting that you chosen to give a very detailed review of this particular SP when you lacked detail in the past

Plenty of details in the reviews you reference.

You pays your money and takes your chance. He enjoyed it, you did too but not enough to give her a neutral or positive because she's apparently been hyped... Somewhere.

Best not to attack each others views, they are as you both found it and therfore valid.

[peiyee]

Exactly, no one is calling out your initial review.

[Puntingutils]

Plenty of details in the reviews you reference.

You pays your money and takes your chance. He enjoyed it, you did too but not enough to give her a neutral or positive because she's apparently been hyped... Somewhere.

Best not to attack each others views, they are as you both found it and therfore valid.

Not sure what I wrote that indicates I'm attacking his view. I stand by my report - she definitely does not look like her AW or unit 8 pictures; i'm assuming those pictures where of her years ago at McKenzies. I gave the negative due to the incorrect pictures, not because of 'hype'. OP asked why the negative was given - so I suggested to re-read the report 

[peiyee]

Just leave it mate. No need to get prickly because someone has a different view.

[Puntingutils]

Just leave it mate. No need to get prickly because someone has a different view.

In what why am I being 'prickly'. The SP does not look like the pictures, saying she does is incorrect. Unless the time taken between our meets, her body flucated in weight, OP is misleading others even if OP believes the SP look the same as the photos. Even if that's the case, I informed OP why I gave the negative as OP was confused. Seems like your the one whose got a problem and being prickly when someone is clarifying a position  . Maybe you should leave it 

[NickyBobby]

Exactly, no one is calling out your initial review.

Scroll up and read the first paragraph under Encounter: - the previous neg is called into question there

[IndigoRocks]

(Reply from Darcy)

Hi Puntingutils

Sorry to hear you weren’t happy with your experience.
But if you’d taken the time to read my AW profile properly you’d have seen I describe myself as curvy size 12. I’m a 10-12 to be exact.

I don’t agree my pictures are misleading and no one else has suggested this either to date.
The only discrepancy on there is that I now have black hair and in my stats I am still down as being blonde.

If you can’t appreciate the female form beyond your own narrow preference then that’s your problem not mine. But there was no need to make such a cruel and personal attack about my weight and appearance.

It is actually quite disappointing to see that most of your reviews are equally if not even more cruel about the looks of the women you spend time with & honestly this says way more about you than us.
The fact you only enjoy 20-30% of your punts (your words) also suggests  either your expectations are way too high or you’re bringing a bad attitude which is putting girls off from the start (most likely both).

Also… as you visited me at a parlour you could have easily walked if you didn’t like how I looked. There was no need to proceed with a booking and subject us both to an unpleasant experience.

Good luck in your punts! But don’t visit me again.

[Puntingutils]

I'm going to say my piece to break down your poor defense of arguments and we can leave it at that. I have no desire to continue this he said she said' situation.

But if you’d taken the time to read my AW profile properly you’d have seen I describe myself as curvy size 12. I’m a 10-12 to be exact.

I don't care what you describe yourself - sizes change bands on certain bands - you don't look like your photos. Update them.

If you can’t appreciate the female form beyond your own narrow preference then that’s your problem not mine.

This has nothing to do with narrow preference or appreciating your 'the female form'. You don't look like how you do luv.

I don’t agree my pictures are misleading and no one else has suggested this either to date.

I'm sure you do disagree. But alas, they are misleading. You only had a few reports  a few years back in 2020 as far as I can tell - so doesn't reflect you at this moment

It is actually quite disappointing to see that most of your reviews are equally if not even more cruel about the looks of the women you spend time with & honestly this says way more about you than us.

What does this have to do with how you look. Most? There is only 1 review that can have be deemed cruel. You misrepresenting says alot about you, maybe you have a pattern of misrepresentation which is also reflected by your pictures? 

Also… as you visited me at a parlour you could have easily walked if you didn’t like how I looked. There was no need to proceed with a booking and subject us both to an unpleasant experience.

What's your point? I could've left and it still warrants a negative.Just because I continued to see you doesn't mean my negative isn't warranted. Don't conflate continuing with the punt to negate the negative. You do not look like your pictures - that warrants a negative as it is unprofessional, misleading, and myself to drive out my way and using my time.
[/quote]

Good luck in your punts! But don’t visit me again.

Don't be silly - we both no I wouldn't.

At the end of the day, I know what I saw so I informed my experience. Of course you'd disagree when it's the truth. I guess more reports will corroborate my experience if people choose to see and report on their experience - unless you start the gym asap.

[IndigoRocks]

Puntingutils - I don’t think Darcy will reply again as she made her point and already moved on to more important things in her day.

But the issue here clearly to be that you don’t respect women - and that really comes through in not only your reviews but also your response on here.

If you think it’s just one review that’s nasty then I’m not going to waste any more of my time on this either as it’s futile.

Good luck… god bless… but stay away from Darcy & stay away from me too.

Cheers,
River

[Puntingutils]

Puntingutils - I don’t think Darcy will reply again as she made her point and already moved on to more important things in her day.

I don't care. I clearly stated It's a "he said she said" situation, in which i have no desire to continue.

But the issue here clearly to be that you don’t respect women - and that really comes through in not only your reviews but also your response on here.

No, the issue is that her photos aren't accurate. Stop your baseless claims - there is nothing I wrote here that suggests I'm disrespectful to women. I'm responsible for what I say, not for how you feel. In all my punts I am very respectful and friendly. I respect women, I just don't respect those who gasp for straws after being confronted with their deception. Keep it up, you're on the verge of being reported - there's zero tolerance for negative attitude toward punters. If you have a problem, let the mods know, and the mods can determine if you are violating rule #2.

Good luck… god bless… but stay away from Darcy & stay away from me too

You both don't want me to see you because you both lack accountability. I'm a lovely, funny, sociable individual, and not a misogynist.
I'll see who I wanna see, thank you very much. Hope your photos are accurate as well - I'm sure you'll get a positive review as you seem to have accurate pictures based on the forum.

As I said before, let's leave it.

[IndigoRocks]

You both don't want me to see you because you both lack accountability. I'm a lovely, funny, sociable individual, and not a misogynist.
I'll see who I wanna see, thank you very much. Hope your photos are accurate as well - I'm sure you'll get a positive review as you seem to have accurate pictures based on the forum.

As I said before, let's leave it.

Are you threatening me?

Not misogynistic! You realise now that I’ve banned you from coming to see me this would be a breach of my consent and therefore assault?

[Puntingutils]

Are you threatening me?

Not misogynistic! You realise now that I’ve banned you from coming to see me this would be a breach of my consent and therefore assault?

No. You keep going on and on how I'm disrespectful, continue to provide a negative attitude against me. You've violated the rules imo. You've already been reported. That isn't a breach of consent as if I do see you, because if I do you will allow for consent as I'm not disrespectful. As I said this is an attempt to discredit me and you lacking accountability.

[daviemac]

I'm a lovely, funny, sociable individual, and not a misogynist.
I'll see who I wanna see, thank you very much.

Are you really saying you would go to see an escort who has made it perfectly clear she doesn't want to see you? Not an action that would be condoned on here.

What's with all the bold typing BTW?

[Puntingutils]

Are you really saying you would go to see an escort who has made it perfectly clear she doesn't want to see you? Not an action that would be condoned on here.

What's with all the bold typing BTW?

No worries. I won't see her then.

Bold typing is to emphasis my point because people tend to gloss over text

[IndigoRocks]

No. You keep going on and on how I'm disrespectful, continue to provide a negative attitude against me. You've violated the rules imo. You've already been reported. That isn't a breach of consent as if I do see you, because if I do you will allow for consent as I'm not disrespectful. As I said this is an attempt to discredit me and you lacking accountability.

I do not consent. A coercive booking is not consent.

If you don’t understand consent you should not be booking women.

We know exactly who you are and you are on CCTV, so I suggest you re think your threat before this escalates into a legal matter.

[Puntingutils]

I do not consent. A coercive booking is not consent.

If you don’t understand consent you should not be booking women.

We know exactly who you are and you are on CCTV, so I suggest you re think your threat before this escalates into a legal matter.

Now you're threating me. I said I won't see you 

[daviemac]

No worries. I won't see her then.

Bold typing is to emphasis my point because people tend to gloss over text

Comes across more as threatening TBH.

[IndigoRocks]

Now you're threating me. I said I won't see you 

Nope, I’m making you aware there are legal (and moral) consequences to ignoring consent. We just replied at the same time.

Glad it’s been cleared up.

[Puntingutils]

Comes across more as threatening TBH.

Am curious as to why that is. I have seen others in the forum say the same thing, as other punters do see it not threating I'll modify this text with he link if people are interested

[IndigoRocks]

Am curious as to why that is. I have seen others in the forum say the same thing, as other punters do see it not threating I'll modify this text with he link if people are interested

I mean you were literally threatening me in your posts. So that’s possibly why eh.

[daviemac]

Am curious as to why that is. I have seen others in the forum say the same thing, as other punters do see it not threating I'll modify this text with he link if people are interested

Look mate, this is a positive review that you are doing you best to discredit, your first post was to point out your negative review and to invite people to reread it. From that you have continued to post in an aggressive manner, including posting in bold, it isn't really the fact you are using bold it is what you are saying in the bold text.

You obviously have something against one or both of these escorts but derailing another member's review is not the place for you to play it out.

If you think there is anything wrong with this or any other review report it, do not use them as you own personal soapbox.

[daviemac]

I mean you were literally threatening me in your posts. So that’s possibly why eh.

Be better for you to just leave it now, there's no point in continuing the argument when it is being dealt with.

[Puntingutils]

I mean you were literally threatening me in your posts. So that’s possibly why eh.

Honestly, I don't see it that way. You can let me know privately if you want, as this discussion is irreverlant to the thread, and I may come to an understanding hopefully. And it wouldn't be a coercive booking as you suggest, as you can always tell me to go away, as allegedly you know who I am.

[IndigoRocks]

Be better for you to just leave it now, there's no point in continuing the argument when it is being dealt with.

Understood & thank you.

[Puntingutils]

Look mate, this is a positive review that you are doing you best to discredit, your first post was to point out your negative review and to invite people to reread it. From that you have continued to post in an aggressive manner, including posting in bold, it isn't really the fact you are using bold it is what you are saying in the bold text.

You obviously have something against one or both of these escorts but derailing another member's review is not the place for you to play it out.

If you think there is anything wrong with this or any other review report it, do not use them as you own personal soapbox.

I never attempted to discredit this review, or trying to derail it, or have a personal vendetta. OP was confused why my review was negative. If OP did not do that I wouldn't have replied. This applies with the other punters who seem to think I was being 'prickly'. Darcy was the one who specifically invited the conversation by saying 'hi puntingutlis'. Every post of mine was to clarify situations and people misrepresenting me. There was only one punter who seem to see where I was coming from

Scroll up and read the first paragraph under Encounter: - the previous neg is called into question there

There is nothing wrong with this review to report, OP has every right to write his experience.

[daviemac]

I never attempted to discredit this review, or trying to derail it, or have a personal vendetta. OP was confused why my review was negative. If OP did not do that I wouldn't have replied. This applies with the other punters who seem to think I was being 'prickly'. There was only one punter who seem to see where I was coming from as they mentioned under the encounter paragraph is where OP said he was confused.There is nothing wrong with this review to report, OP has every right to write his experience.

Your negative review is there for all to see, plus what do you call "is interesting that you chosen to give a very detailed review of this particular SP when you lacked detail in the past" if not trying to discredit the review.

You were told not to attack each other's reviews and were also told to 'leave it', advice you chose to ignore. As a result of your continuing to post about your own review IndigoRocks posted a message from Darcy and without you derailing the thread that would not have happened, that lead to even more post from you that have nothing to do with this review.

What you have done on this thread is out of order, as was threatening to book an escort who had made it clear she didn't want to see you.

Edit

Do not type in bold when replying to me. I used bold to emphasise what was wrong with your post, to make sure you understand.

[daviemac]

Honestly, I don't see it that way. You can let me know privately if you want, as this discussion is irreverlant to the thread, and I may come to an understanding hopefully. And it wouldn't be a coercive booking as you suggest, as you can always tell me to go away, as allegedly you know who I am.

Still threatening to book her I see. You shouldn't even be there for her to tell you to go away.

[Puntingutils]

Your negative review is there for all to see, plus what do you call "is interesting that you chosen to give a very detailed review of this particular SP when you lacked detail in the past" if not trying to discredit the review.

You were told not to attack each other's reviews and were also told to 'leave it', advice you chose to ignore. As a result of your continuing to post about your own review IndigoRocks posted a message from Darcy and without you derailing the thread that would not have happened, that lead to even more post from you that have nothing to do with this review.

What you have done on this thread is out of order, as was threatening to book an escort who had made it clear she didn't want to see you.

Edit

Do not type in bold when replying to me. I used bold to emphasise what was wrong with your post, to make sure you understand.

It's interesting as I recall whether on this site or puntingwiki that if you disagree with a persons review, you can mention your reasons in the post? So I didn't derail this thread as it was allowed. If the other punters let it be, none of this would have happened. They derailed it my attacking me. At what point are you allowed or not allowed to comment on the thread as the comment may derail the thread.  Did night-owl, peiyee, nick derail the thread? Or is it my fault because I commented my stance, which is allowed, on the thread.

And as for indigorocks comment, so you're saying to just let her misrepresent me? She could've left it once I clarified Darcy message, but no she and Darcy attacked my character?

[Puntingutils]

Still threatening to book her I see. You shouldn't even be there for her to tell you to go away.

Clearly not. I never said i was going to see her after I responded to you.she edited her comment and I was explaining why it is wouldn't be a coercive booking. I also said to take this off the thread aswell as it's irrelevant to Darcy.

[daviemac]

It's interesting as I recall whether on this site or puntingwiki that if you disagree with a persons review, you can mention your reasons in the post? So I didn't derail this thread as it was allowed. If the other punters let it be, none of this would have happened. They derailed it my attacking me. At what point are you allowed or not allowed to comment on the thread as the comment may derail the thread.  Did night-owl, peiyee, nick derail the thread? Or is it my fault because I commented my stance, which is allowed, on the thread.

And as for indigorocks comment, so you're saying to just let her misrepresent me? She could've left it once I clarified Darcy message, but no she and Darcy attacked my character?

You are wrong, disagreeing with another persons review is something we are actively putting a stop to, hence my posting on this thread. When a member posts a review he is relaying the experience he had at the time, what has gone before is irrelevant.

The other people you mention were not derailing the thread they were telling you you were wrong, something you are failing to grasp. You stated this whole saga, without reply #1 none of this would have happened.

Just to clarify, you derailed the thread by questioning the OP's review and the fact he gave what you think was more detail in it than he did in others. You then post "I'll see who I wanna see", most of your posts have been aggressive and or intimidating, like you're on some power trip with escorts.

People react to the way others portray themselves so perhaps you need to look at what you post and how you post it.

[Puntingutils]

I take full accountability of my actions. The following responses are explainatiins and not me dodging anything. Thank you for the clarification Davie. Hopefully we can move in from this now.

You are wrong, disagreeing with another persons review is something we are actively putting a stop to, hence my posting on this thread. When a member posts a review he is relaying the experience he had at the time, what has gone before is irrelevant.

After looking at puntingwiki, I can see that I misread and misremembered this. This is my fault. I apologize for this. I will refresh the wiki so this will not happen again.

The other people you mention were not derailing the thread they were telling you you were wrong, something you are failing to grasp. You stated this whole saga, without reply #1 none of this would have happened.

As the people weren't mods, I didn't take their comments as authority, not knowing the mods are trying to remove this behaviour.
I did see OP questioning my review to be an open invitation to comment on this thread to clarify my reasoning. To some degree then attacked so I had to clarify my position, but I can see why I derailed the thread as the puntingwiki doesn't say to mention your neg review on someone's positive. The SP's are just as bad aswell buly their antics aswell.

Just to clarify, you derailed the thread by questioning the OP's review and the fact he gave what you think was more detail than in it than he did in others.

As mentioned I assumed it was fair play by OP's question and me being wrong with the wiki. I do  believe OP's review has much more content and better structure compared to his previous reviews. This is his best review out of all others imo. What I said was factual. OP gave much more effort to this review than the previous. To be fair I didn't attack him, I am not sure if you are able to see my first reply before modified - i did say along the lines 'here's to more like these in the future '. So it wasn't a direct attempt to attack the OP, more of a neutral response answering the question of him being confused.

You then post "I'll see who I wanna see", most of your posts have been aggressive and or intimidating, like you're on some power trip with escorts.

Yes, there was one post before that comment which was intimidating - saying about the report. She had no business to continue to insult me and lie about me. I said I had no desire to continue this prior and yet she still responded attacking me. I assumed it would have kept continuing, hence the keep it up part.
As for the agressiveness prior, If you lie about me or insult me I'll be blunt, it's what it is.
The "I'll see who I wanna see" is something I wouldn't normally say. Where I'm from, when someone says god bless, followed by a statement, they are undermining you, telling you to go f yourself, and are being audicous. So I gave her the same energy back.

People react to the way others portray themselves so perhaps you need to look at what you post and how you post it.

Agreed. Same goes for the SP's here, they are just as bad. All of this could've stopped earlier if they were also aware of the wiki:
External Link/Members Only
I am an escort and the review is about me and it is false
"What NOT to do. Attack or criticise anyone. Not even the OP. Really don't bother.
Consider strongly doing nothing. Even the best escorts have a negative or two. Doing nothing may be the best answer.
If after all this, you still need to respond, make your comments upbeat and positive. 'I always try to provide a good service and I am sorry if any punter leaves unhappy.'

[Night-Owl]

Not sure what I wrote that indicates I'm attacking his view. I stand by my report - she definitely does not look like her AW or unit 8 pictures; i'm assuming those pictures where of her years ago at McKenzies. I gave the negative due to the incorrect pictures, not because of 'hype'. OP asked why the negative was given - so I suggested to re-read the report 

As has been pointed out above, you made it very clear that you thought this review was bogus or whatever by questioning the detail the OP but. You didn't need to do that, but you did.

You have then been aggressive with the SP.

Neither of these things are called for...


For what it's worth I've met the OP, pre covid lock downs at Unit 8 and elsewhere. Her images were accurate then and I found her quite attractive. Haven't been able to get back since covid with work and other commitments. I did however find both your negative review and this positive one useful.

Attacking others for their opinion on here is counter productive. We all benefit if we all share. Attacking or belittling another poster weakens the forum.

[daviemac]

I take full accountability of my actions. The following responses are explainatiins and not me dodging anything. Thank you for the clarification Davie. Hopefully we can move in from this now.
After looking at puntingwiki, I can see that I misread and misremembered this. This is my fault. I apologize for this. I will refresh the wiki so this will not happen again.

As the people weren't mods, I didn't take their comments as authority, not knowing the mods are trying to remove this behaviour.
I did see OP questioning my review to be an open invitation to comment on this thread to clarify my reasoning. To some degree then attacked so I had to clarify my position, but I can see why I derailed the thread as the puntingwiki doesn't say to mention your neg review on someone's positive. The SP's are just as bad aswell buly their antics aswell.

As mentioned I assumed it was fair play by OP's question and me being wrong with the wiki. I do  believe OP's review has much more content and better structure compared to his previous reviews. This is his best review out of all others imo. What I said was factual. OP gave much more effort to this review than the previous. To be fair I didn't attack him, I am not sure if you are able to see my first reply before modified - i did say along the lines 'here's to more like these in the future '. So it wasn't a direct attempt to attack the OP, more of a neutral response answering the question of him being confused.
Yes, there was one post before that comment which was intimidating - saying about the report. She had no business to continue to insult me and lie about me. I said I had no desire to continue this prior and yet she still responded attacking me. I assumed it would have kept continuing, hence the keep it up part.
As for the agressiveness prior, If you lie about me or insult me I'll be blunt, it's what it is.
The "I'll see who I wanna see" is something I wouldn't normally say. Where I'm from, when someone says god bless, followed by a statement, they are undermining you, telling you to go f yourself, and are being audicous. So I gave her the same energy back.


Agreed. Same goes for the SP's here, they are just as bad. All of this could've stopped earlier if they were also aware of the wiki:
External Link/Members Only
I am an escort and the review is about me and it is false
"What NOT to do. Attack or criticise anyone. Not even the OP. Really don't bother.
Consider strongly doing nothing. Even the best escorts have a negative or two. Doing nothing may be the best answer.
If after all this, you still need to respond, make your comments upbeat and positive. 'I always try to provide a good service and I am sorry if any punter leaves unhappy.'

You are quoting the punting wiki which is a guide BTW, I, as a mod, am telling you the rules and judging by the above ramblings you are still trying justify your posts. Just because something that shouldn't be said isn't spelled out in words of one syllable in the punting wiki does not mean it is within the rules.

The OP of this did not directly question your review, he passed a comment that he didn't know why she got a negative, that is not an invitation for you to question the detail in his review and therefore it's authenticity.

If I think an escort needs a reminder about how they should respond to a review I will tell them, it isn't up to you to be quoting what you deem to be the rules.

As you have gone to great lengths to quote what you think are the rules to me I think a couple of weeks break from the site is in order and when you come back maybe you will accept that what a moderator says trumps the way you interpret the punting wiki.