A non-UKP view of EAS

[yandex]

External Link/Members Only

Some interesting responses here and pretty much the same as a lot of the advice given by UKPer's.

Who'd have thought so many of us read the Guardian 

[Stevelondon]

Well I know I certainly don’t……. Read the Guardian that is 

Bloody hell. Who are these muppets who ask these daft questions.
Just stop paying the girl and see if she STILL  provides the girlfriend experience ……. For fucks sake. 

[akauya]

External Link/Members Only

Some interesting responses here and pretty much the same as a lot of the advice given by UKPer's.

Who'd have thought so many of us read the Guardian 

Judging from some of the posts in the off-topic threads very few of us I think.


As for EAS, it probably happens a lot more then we realise. I often thought the saying "the way to a man's heart is through his stomach" should have been "the way to a man's heart is through his cock." Some men tend to conflate physical intimacy with emotional attachment.

[chadpitt]

The author in a nutshell said it's just a professional relationship.

[Jonestown]

This looks like its from an Australian edition of The Guardian, not sure the original letter writer would get the same responses in the comments section from a UK edition.

[Dogfather]

Seeing an escort more than once a week over a year would get an SPs radar going off for EAS I would have thought.
Doesn't sound like normal to me.

Anyone else doing that at the moment on here?

[willie loman]

i never pay any attention to advice about sex etc which is for an australian audience.

[Vice Admiral]

Bloody hell. Who are these muppets who ask these daft questions.

The muppets in question don't exist.  Any more – spoiler alert – than Kermit does.

I don't read the Guardian, but there's a chick called Suzi Godson who's been writing a sex advice column in the Times on Saturday since Jesus was a boy.  (In fact, Wikipedia tells me, since 2004.)

Does anyone honestly think there are people so sad and desperate and bored that they write to newspaper sex counsellors for advice?  And, more particularly, that there are enough of them for their unique and peculiar questions to fill, in Suzi's case, 19 x 52 = 988 columns?

At the bottom of each of the fragrant Suzi's pieces is the rubric: "Send your queries to weekendsex@the times.co.uk"

I keep meaning to write to her and say, "My query is as follows.  How many of the questions are sent in by genuine readers and how many are dreamt up by you and your chums when you've been hitting the prosecco?  My guess is that the proportion is around 5% genuine to 95% in-house piss-heads.  Am I about right?"

But I never get round to it. 

[southcoastpunter]

Seeing an escort more than once a week over a year would get an SPs radar going off for EAS I would have thought.
Doesn't sound like normal to me.

Anyone else doing that at the moment on here?

not now but a few years ago i saw the same Escort at least once a week for about 2 years. The reason was simple and nothing to do with (so called) EAS - I found her attractive, she was good (and consistent) at her job, her rate was reasonable and her location (for me) was great. 10 minutes drive from work so i could see her lunchtime and/or on my way home.

[pbrown355]

Never that frequent but once per fortnight with more than one over the years. With each one I only stopped when they moved on. Usual reasons from me. I liked what they did and how they did it. I may even have liked them. But it was always a business relationship, never a hint of anything more on my part.

[Stevelondon]

Oooooooooh.    I am always wary of those blokes who post on here about

“It’s definitely not EAS, but I did used to see this bird every week, it was only because of location, price, etc”
😂

[DDMC30]

This looks like its from an Australian edition of The Guardian, not sure the original letter writer would get the same responses in the comments section from a UK edition.

there would be enraged comments calling for all involved to be arrested

[LLPunting]

It's a bait letter, either posted by a real troll or as suggested above just a naff fake by the column's staff to get some sensational attention to protect their jobs.  One of the reasons I wouldn't respond to the paper's constant pleadings for donations to support their "journalism".

The writer says nothing about the SP's feelings, his imagining what they are or indeed observations of her expressing any.  Just because a bloke can string a few sentences together (with significant missing detail) doesn't mean he isn't a sociopath or some obsessive projecting his fantasy into the letter when the reality is he's not visiting the SP just stalking her or worse is seeing her regularly, cumming prematurely and leaving and the girl's impression is that he's easy work and has never seen him for more than 15 mins.

[mr.bluesky]

The muppets in question don't exist.  Any more – spoiler alert – than Kermit does.

Kermit doesn't exist  you mean to say there is no such thing as a large talking frog, Bugger .You'll be telling me next there is no such thing as Santa Clause 

[Stevelondon]

Kermit doesn't exist  you mean to say there is no such thing as a large talking frog, Bugger .You'll be telling me next there is no such thing as Santa Clause 

That would be the American way of spelling his name then 

[akauya]

OK, either some of you guys are extremely sceptical about everything or I'm a complete gullible mug who believes everything he's told 

Whatever, whether the letter is genuine or not, the reply from the sex worker Gatubela is a sobering reminder from SWs to (some) guys confusing physical intimacy with emotional intimacy.

[Vice Admiral]

Kermit doesn't exist  you mean to say there is no such thing as a large talking frog, Bugger .You'll be telling me next there is no such thing as Santa Clause 

After I opined that Kermit doesn't exist, I wondered if I had been over-hasty.

It depends, I suppose, on how you define reality.

Kermit certainly exists on one level.  We can see him.  If we were in his presence, we could touch him.  However he is unable to function fully without the aid of a human hand and a human voice.  The question therefore is this: "Is Kermit pretending to be a real frog?  Or is he presenting himself honestly as what he actually is, a puppet?"

But then Kermit, as far as we know, is not fully sentient, so he can't "pretend" to be anything.

It's a minefield.

[Thephoenix]

After I opined that Kermit doesn't exist, I wondered if I had been over-hasty.

It depends, I suppose, on how you define reality.

Kermit certainly exists on one level.  We can see him.  If we were in his presence, we could touch him.  However he is unable to function fully without the aid of a human hand and a human voice.  The question therefore is this: "Is Kermit pretending to be a real frog?  Or is he presenting himself honestly as what he actually is, a puppet?"

But then Kermit, as far as we know, is not fully sentient, so he can't "pretend" to be anything.

It's a minefield.

It's life Jim!....But not as we know it!

[mr.bluesky]

That would be the American way of spelling his name then 

Who Kermit ? 

[LLPunting]

OK, either some of you guys are extremely sceptical about everything or I'm a complete gullible mug who believes everything he's told 

Whatever, whether the letter is genuine or not, the reply from the sex worker Gatubela is a sobering reminder from SWs to (some) guys confusing physical intimacy with emotional intimacy.

Perhaps she's also on here, we've heard similar from some of our fairer contributors.

[Darren101]

What is EAS short for, in this context?

 

[daviemac]

What is EAS short for, in this context?

 

Emotional/escort attachment syndrome

External Link/Members Only