Sophia of Northern/Sheffield Belles - Sheffield

[Puntingutils]

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
Comms
SMS

Location
Apartment at wicker, nearby castlegate area

The SP
Dim lighting, so ymmv
5ft6 , pictures accurate.
Face - i'd say a majority would find her above average/ above attractive. I'd say she could pass for the late 30's/early 40's. Regardless, she does look good for her age and is objectively at least average/above average. Ironically she's objectively more attractive than some of the younger girls at the agency imo.
Was concerned she'd be too bony as long distance runners usually are, but that didn't seem to be the case from my experience.

Service
£110, 45 minutes
I pretty much agree with the positive reports.
Kissing (sensual)- finally a girl at the agency who actually kisses well and with tounge.
Takes direction well.
OWO was sensual
There were moments of divided attention which was annoying, but overall good service.

Personality
Easy to talk to, seems nice.

Overall, one of the best SP I've seen at the agency from my experience based on my expectations.

[viper13]

Thanks for the review. 
Seen this one myself and reviewed.
Very attractive IMHO but subjective I know.
Had a great time, dressed as requested and looked good enough to eat, and I tried 
Good attitude, very friendly and accommodating.  I found her very eager to please and gave a great sensual GFE.
Had comms with her recently but not arranged a second meet as yet but will at some point
 

[wristjob]

Face - i'd say a majority would find her above average/ above attractive. I'd say she could pass for the late 30's/early 40's. Regardless, she does look good for her age and is objectively at least average/above average. Ironically she's objectively more attractive than some of the younger girls at the agency imo.

Definite ymmv situation. I'm the only person to meet her and give her a red. Her service was good enough but the whole skin hanging off bone look creeped me out, I just really didn't want to be in the room with her and wouldn't go back if it was free, and really struggled believing she was under 50. I'm not having a dig at her but maybe sheds some light on your opinion of Victoria. 2 others found her attractive and you really didn't. Appearance is probably always going to be the most contentious part of punts.

[Candyman1900]

I have seen this lass a few times lately and I can't fault her, but as has been said everyone has different opinions to what they find attractive. If we all agreed on everything wouldn't life be boring. Great review pal

[Puntingutils]

Definite ymmv situation. I'm the only person to meet her and give her a red. Her service was good enough but the whole skin hanging off bone look creeped me out, I just really didn't want to be in the room with her and wouldn't go back if it was free, and really struggled believing she was under 50. I'm not having a dig at her but maybe sheds some light on your opinion of Victoria. 2 others found her attractive and you really didn't. Appearance is probably always going to be the most contentious part of punts.

When I mean she's objectively attractive, it has more emphasis on facial harmony, bone structure, gonial angle, philtrum length, stuff like this per say.

I think I'll redact the majority will find her attractive because I have no idea what people on this forum are attracted to. I said that because I got the initial impression the majority have low standards compared to me from reading the reviews here.

As for her age, it's like Julie Bowen - she's near 50 in this picture, but she could pass 5 years younger given makeup to reduce wrinkles and given lack of lighting, which happened in the booking, perhaps even younger. So the age estimation of this review could be slightly skewed due to dim lighting and makeup. Also, due to the lighting, perhaps the bony look you described was not that apparent to me.

As for Victoria, granted I wasn't attracted to her, but I'm struggling to see her being a typical 25 year old, which blurred images gives you the impression off, considering I saw her in good lighting. Maybe it's the makeup, filler, skin texture, that led me to believe this, but hey I guess more reports are needed. How about I reimburse 50% of a 30minute with Victoria and you get back to me with your thoughts haha.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[wristjob]

As for Victoria, granted I wasn't attracted to her, but I'm struggling to see her being a typical 25 year old, which blurred images gives you the impression off, considering I saw her in good lighting. Maybe it's the makeup, filler, skin texture, that led me to believe this, but hey I guess more reports are needed. How about I reimburse 50% of a 30minute with Victoria and you get back to me with your thoughts haha.

I am not overly interested in 30 min bookings now and especially with girls who are disinterested. It's not like she was top of my list anyway so I think I'll pass.

When I saw Sophia she was with girlsofeden and advertised as 29, 6 months later she's 37 External Link/Members Only

Somebody replied on the review he knew for a fact her actual age is 45. I get ages can be fluid and tweaked a bit but there is shaving a few years off a girl who will probably be made up looking and her best on the day. To call that 39/40 on the profile is probably what we would expect, but to take a 45 year old (who IMO looked older) and call her 29 was shocking. If she'd had her current photos and been down as 36 then I would probably have been happier but I really didn't expect what I got.

I also imagine the agencies need to see proof of id/age etc to avoid all sorts of nasty issues so there's no question they know what they are doing and shaving 16 years is a blatant piss take.

[Puntingutils]

I am not overly interested in 30 min bookings now and especially with girls who are disinterested. It's not like she was top of my list anyway so I think I'll pass.

When I saw Sophia she was with girlsofeden and advertised as 29, 6 months later she's 37 External Link/Members Only

Somebody replied on the review he knew for a fact her actual age is 45. I get ages can be fluid and tweaked a bit but there is shaving a few years off a girl who will probably be made up looking and her best on the day. To call that 39/40 on the profile is probably what we would expect, but to take a 45 year old (who IMO looked older) and call her 29 was shocking. If she'd had her current photos and been down as 36 then I would probably have been happier but I really didn't expect what I got.

I also imagine the agencies need to see proof of id/age etc to avoid all sorts of nasty issues so there's no question they know what they are doing and shaving 16 years is a blatant piss take.

Ouch. Given the old photos and stating 29 I can see the unmet expectations and disappointment. I agree, the agency probably knew what they where doing. 36 to 50 is still a big stretch so not sure if that was due to you being shocked, but I can only say with what I saw based on my conditions. As you said she's actually in the middle between what I saw and what you saw, so it might be due to someone's expectations at the end of the day