What's the rule?

[dub6747]

Can you put up a review on someone you did a review of 18 months ago?

[GingerNuts]

Why did you post this question as a review?

There's a link to the site rules at the bottom of every page, try Rule 4.

[The_Don]

Site Rules

try Rule 4.

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meeting does not need to occur, and money does not need to change hands. The only criteria are that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months ( for new members, this rule is currently relaxed to 12 months)after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).
No abbreviations of establishments in the title of a review.

[dub6747]

Site Rules

Ok,  I'm clear now

[Stevelondon]

Can you put up a review on someone you did a review of 18 months ago?

Sorry if I’ve misunderstood. But are you asking if you can review a SP a second time…… one that you’ve already reviewed 18 months ago. ?

[sensualencounter]

Sorry if I’ve misunderstood. But are you asking if you can review a SP a second time…… one that you’ve already reviewed 18 months ago. ?

That’s how I’ve read the OP. And as much as the rules are there to be followed (and obviously rightly so) a repeat review of someone you’ve seen is of value imo so long as it’s not touting and so long as it’s not essentially the same (or a very similar) booking in a short space of time.

A second (of more) review of the same escort should add value to the site and I take that to be showing a different type of meet in terms of services / length / performance / noticeable physicality change / location quality or to highlight that her service level hasn’t dropped over a period of time (my personal opinion is about a year plus as a lot can change in a year).

That’s only my opinion and how I approach this but it fits nicely within the framework of the rules. Essentially, I’d say just use your common sense but we’ve seen plenty that don’t seem to have any!

[Stevelondon]

That’s how I’ve read the OP. And as much as the rules are there to be followed (and obviously rightly so) a repeat review of someone you’ve seen is of value imo so long as it’s not touting and so long as it’s not essentially the same (or a very similar) booking in a short space of time.

A second (of more) review of the same escort should add value to the site and I take that to be showing a different type of meet in terms of services / length / performance / noticeable physicality change / location quality or to highlight that her service level hasn’t dropped over a period of time (my personal opinion is about a year plus as a lot can change in a year).

That’s only my opinion and how I approach this but it fits nicely within the framework of the rules. Essentially, I’d say just use your common sense but we’ve seen plenty that don’t seem to have any!

Agreed.
It was mentioned somewhere else about a certain SP having put on weight over a period of time. So a second review of the same girl by the same reviewer would go along with the above.

[FiveKnuckles]

Can you put up a review on someone you did a review of 18 months ago?

- I've reviewed a girl 12 months apart.  Good to confirm services and looks.
- If I revisited months apart, I just post in my original review. 

 

[ulstersubbie]

- I've reviewed a girl 12 months apart.  Good to confirm services and looks.

Same here, although the second time she was part of a duo offering BDSM.