Would quick fire reviews of about 15 girls I’ve seen this last year be helpful?

[madmania]

Hi South East board,

I used to be active on the site a few years ago but life got a bit much for me for a while so took a break from things. Then Covid happened and that caused an enforced break too.

However the last year or two I’ve been back to punting, primarily touring girls who visit Guernsey. Whilst I used to write in-depth reviews which seemed to be universally appreciated, I no longer have the time or inclination to do those anymore.

My question however is whether very quick short reviews would be appreciated anyway? Even if they don’t have huge amounts of detail, I imagine that the basics might be helpful - especially as I’ve got negatives to say about generally positive reviewed girls and positives for generally negatively reviewed girls.

Please let me know if I should bother and if so I’ll start writing them up 

[contentguy]

Your previous reviews were a bit TLDR for my taste.

Why not just capture the key points rather than go all “Tolstoy”.
This might help  External Link/Members Only

A decent informative review can be done in a very short time.

[Moby Dick]

Are you up to date regarding the rules:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=252680.0

“4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meeting does not need to occur, and money does not need to change hands. The only criteria are that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months ( for new members, this rule is currently relaxed to 12 months)after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).
No abbreviations of establishments in the title of a review.”

[madmania]

Your previous reviews were a bit TLDR for my taste.

Why not just capture the key points rather than go all “Tolstoy”.
This might help  External Link/Members Only

A decent informative review can be done in a very short time.

Sounds like shorter reviews might even be preferable for some of you then 

Are you up to date regarding the rules:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=252680.0

 Reviews are allowed up to 6 months ( for new members, this rule is currently relaxed to 12 months)after the event(positive or negative)

The 6 month rule was in place back when I used the site. My reviews will be somewhere between 1 week and 12 months after the event. I can’t always remember exactly when I saw a girl and I’m not wading through text histories to piece together a timeline. Hopefully that is still found acceptable!

Thanks for your responses chaps 

[southcoastpunter]

My question however is whether very quick short reviews would be appreciated anyway? Even if they don’t have huge amounts of detail, I imagine that the basics might be helpful - especially as I’ve got negatives to say about generally positive reviewed girls and positives for generally negatively reviewed girls.

short answer is "yes". - you can give a fair amount of info in say 5 minutes (unless you are a very slow typist) so yes please do reviews on those you have seen in the second half of 2022. (6 month rule)

(edit - didn't see your above post OP when i did this)

[Iloveoral]

The reviews need to meet the rules, if it fits it’s allowed, 12 month old reviews don’t fit
You’ve been here long enough to notice there is a link to the rules at the bottom of every page

[madmania]

The reviews need to meet the rules, if it fits it’s allowed, 12 month old reviews don’t fit
You’ve been here long enough to notice there is a link to the rules at the bottom of every page

Shall I not bother posting then? I don’t want to fall foul of the rules and I can’t guarantee that my reviews will be for meets exactly 6 months or less (although I know the majority will be). I assumed they’d be helpful but if not I don’t want to waste my time nor cause any issues.

[daviemac]

Shall I not bother posting then? I don’t want to fall foul of the rules and I can’t guarantee that my reviews will be for meets exactly 6 months or less (although I know the majority will be). I assumed they’d be helpful but if not I don’t want to waste my time nor cause any issues.

Looks to me like you are taking the piss now with the 2 reviews you've posted, short reviews are alright provided they give the basic information like price and duration booked.

[madmania]

Looks to me like you are taking the piss now with the 2 reviews you've posted, short reviews are alright provided they give the basic information like price and duration booked.

Sorry you think I’m “taking the piss”. That wasn’t my intention at all. Was honestly just wanting to give back to the site which has helped me out greatly over the years.

Its unfortunate that my reviews weren't up to scratch, I won’t post anymore then. Apologies for wasting everyone’s time.

Feel free to edit my two posted reviews as it seems I cannot do so myself:

Antonella - £200 p/h, seen her for an hour each time
Brooke - one was an hour at £180, other was two hours at £300

[Iloveoral]

Shall I not bother posting then?

Problem with that is it also breaks the rules for not contributing and my buddy Daviemac is already lacing his boots up, be warned he’s a bad motherfucker, rumour has it he once banned a guy for sneezing!!!
Yeah, that’s what I’m talking about. 

[daviemac]

Sorry you think I’m “taking the piss”. That wasn’t my intention at all. Was honestly just wanting to give back to the site which has helped me out greatly over the years.

Its unfortunate that my reviews weren't up to scratch, I won’t post anymore then. Apologies for wasting everyone’s time.

Feel free to edit my two posted reviews as it seems I cannot do so myself:

Antonella - £200 p/h, seen her for an hour each time
Brooke - one was an hour at £180, other was two hours at £300

You can't tell me that adding "1 hour £180" and something like "DFK, OWO, reverse oral, rimming both ways, tit sucking, hand relief, sex (missionary, doggy, CG)" would kill you and that's all it would have taken to comply with the requirements for reviews.

If you post those sort of details on both of your reviews I'll edit them in. No need for you to throw your toys out the pram.

[madmania]

No need for you to throw your toys out the pram.

Yes, clearly I’m having a tantrum over here

Again, sorry my attempt to contribute fell short of the requirements. I’ll keep in mind what is considered the minimum information next time. Thanks for your help

[Punterperson1971]

Yes, clearly I’m having a tantrum over here

Again, sorry my attempt to contribute fell short of the requirements. I’ll keep in mind what is considered the minimum information next time. Thanks for your help

Stop being childish and attention seeking and grow a pair and accept some criticism ffs

[sensualencounter]

OP, if you really want some back patting and fellow members to appreciate you, just post the reviews in the correct manner and get on with it. All this histrionics and passive aggressiveness is incredibly childish and will quickly mark you out as a wanker.

The membership appreciates reviews but they are simply the lifeblood of this site and you seem to be hanging out for adulation and fawning.

In addition, you've clearly been punting for the past year, so why didn't you write them up sooner, within the six month window? It all seems like a big attention seeking attempt and has failed pretty spectacularly.

[Ivor Hunch]

I don't really understand the fixation with "the rules"-  it's not stalinist russia here (or, at least, shouldn't be!).

Just had a quick skim of the two reviews OP posted yesterday.  Yes, some further info would make the reviews more helpful, esp price and services, and probably would not take much more time.

But, on the other hand, are we better off with those reviews, or with nothing?  Overwhelmingly the former, I'd say. 

So why discourage people from posting?

[Iloveoral]

I don't really understand the fixation with "the rules"-  it's not stalinist russia here (or, at least, shouldn't be!).

You don’t understand why the site has rules, set by the owner and admin, who want their site ran a certain way?
That’s a bit difficult for you? Really?

[madmania]

OP, if you really want some back patting and fellow members to appreciate you, just post the reviews in the correct manner and get on with it. All this histrionics and passive aggressiveness is incredibly childish and will quickly mark you out as a wanker.

The membership appreciates reviews but they are simply the lifeblood of this site and you seem to be hanging out for adulation and fawning.

Damn, you really have me pegged all wrong lol. I really couldn’t give two shits what people think of me from a post in a forum. I wasn’t looking for anything other than to write a few reviews to give some basic info for anyone who might have found that useful - purely to give back. I’m not after adulation or the like (because anonymous punters’ praise is clearly so meaningful), but I wasn’t expecting the rudeness or berating I received.

In addition, you've clearly been punting for the past year, so why didn't you write them up sooner, within the six month window?

Because I don’t really use this site anymore. I punt primarily in an escort desert and broadly see anyone who tours here so I rarely bother even looking up the AW profiles on UKP. If I was active here then maybe I would have posted as and when my punts happened - but I’m not. Also as stated in my original post, I’m much busier now than I used to be.

I simply had a thought last night that maybe I should do some short write ups because most of the touring girls that come here are hardly reviewed, or reviewed years and years ago - and I remember how important UKP was for me back in the day. Fuck me for trying to help I guess.

It all seems like a big attention seeking attempt and has failed pretty spectacularly.

Yep totally you got me chief

This is the last I’m gonna say on the topic now, nothing more is being achieved. Peace

[daviemac]

I don't really understand the fixation with "the rules"-  it's not stalinist russia here (or, at least, shouldn't be!).

Just had a quick skim of the two reviews OP posted yesterday.  Yes, some further info would make the reviews more helpful, esp price and services, and probably would not take much more time.

But, on the other hand, are we better off with those reviews, or with nothing?  Overwhelmingly the former, I'd say. 

So why discourage people from posting?

This situation is down to his attitude, he comes over as if the rules shouldn't apply to him, I gave him the opportunity to post the list of services and prices in his review threads and I would edit them into the reviews for him. Not really a big ask is it? He has posted far more on this thread trying to justify not posting details than it would have taken to post, what? 2 lines on each review. He has chosen not to do that.

[Punterperson1971]

Damn, you really have me pegged all wrong lol. I really couldn’t give two shits what people think of me from a post in a forum. I wasn’t looking for anything other than to write a few reviews to give some basic info for anyone who might have found that useful - purely to give back. I’m not after adulation or the like (because anonymous punters’ praise is clearly so meaningful), but I wasn’t expecting the rudeness or berating I received.

Because I don’t really use this site anymore. I punt primarily in an escort desert and broadly see anyone who tours here so I rarely bother even looking up the AW profiles on UKP. If I was active here then maybe I would have posted as and when my punts happened - but I’m not. Also as stated in my original post, I’m much busier now than I used to be.

I simply had a thought last night that maybe I should do some short write ups because most of the touring girls that come here are hardly reviewed, or reviewed years and years ago - and I remember how important UKP was for me back in the day. Fuck me for trying to help I guess.

Yep totally you got me chief

This is the last I’m gonna say on the topic now, nothing more is being achieved. Peace

So if you don’t really use this site anymore even for checking against aw then why bother posting anything or even log on here,I’m sure a moderator can say if youve been using this site more than you’ve said you have.

[contentguy]

Sounds to me like the OP is sneezing like he’s got a dose of something nasty!

I’ll miss him!

Problem with that is it also breaks the rules for not contributing and my buddy Daviemac is already lacing his boots up, be warned he’s a bad motherfucker, rumour has it he once banned a guy for sneezing!!!
Yeah, that’s what I’m talking about.