Author Topic: SexyHotEmmaxx, Birmingham city centre, TOFTT!!  (Read 1825 times)


2 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6759288) (1 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by GingerNuts]
2 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 7085986) (1 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by JD1]

Offline alabama1

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
When : Last week
Location : Well known apartment block, by canal. B3 postcode. Keypad entry through outside gate (which wasn't working), then another code to access apartment block.
Comms : Excellent. All by text, then a phone call on final approach.
Price : £90 for 30 minutes
Description : I personally found her very attractive. Average height, long blonde hair, lovely petite body, (she states size 8 on her profile, but i would say she is closer to a size 6). very small, perky tits, nice neat (shaved) pussy, lovely little arse, immaculate make up. nice underwear, very clean and friendly. In fact , she ticked all my boxes. So far so good.... :rolleyes:
Services : I keep on making the same mistake of not confirming services before handing over the cash.  :mad: OW, RO, Rimming, Mish, CG, Doggy, Spoons,
Action : I had an inkling on how things were gonna pan out , when i asked (out of courtesy) if i should take a shower, and she said no. Anyway, fee paid, stripped off, and straight into some fondling, but 'no kissing baby',whilst standing by the bed. Ordered onto bed where after a very brief handjob, she reached for the condom. OWO ? i asked, 'is esstra baby' was her reply. :( With an half erect dick, i managed to stop her mounting me by requesting RO on her. Her pussy was shaved, very neat, and very tasty. She seemed to like the licking, but gave me a bollocking for sucking. :D Nice rimming also on her. She's a very clean girl. :D. Went through the positions, (prolonged spoons was nice), but the highlight (and one for the wankbank), was finishing in doggy, (despite her verbally and physically limiting stroke depth), viewing that lovely little tight arse. Ecstasy soon turned to dismay though, as she removed my cock whilst i was still cumming. :( I informed her of this, but she said she doesn't allow anyone to cumm inside of her. I did have a fully intact condom on for fuck's sake ! The clean up was quite good actually, more like a milking session. :wacko: She ought to add this to her likes list. In and out in approx. 25 minutes.
Pros : Not classic model looks facially, but very attractive none the less imo, stunning little size 6 body with tiny firm tits and a tight little arse. Friendly, clean, pays a lot of attention to her appearance
Cons : No kissing, (but it's not on her list), No OWO or fingering, both of which are on her list !, No attention to balls. But the two major issues i had were her limiting penetration, with her hand, (in every position), and withdrawing my dick whilst i was still cumming.
Conclusion : She could so easily be one of the best wg's in Brum, but for the Rom traits mentioned, which they all seem to find difficult to shake off. I wouldn't go back, but if you want to fuck a young, friendly, size 6 toned body, with small firm tits, and a fantastic little arse,(did i mention her arse)  :wacko: and you can get over all of her restrictions, then she's the girl for you.
« Last Edit: November 15, 2022, 09:21:06 am by alabama1 »

Offline Tender.french.kiss

Your review and your choice but sounds more like a neg to me. Don't know if I  read it incorrectly but the way you describe some moments she sounds more snappy than friendly to me. Might have a cracking body but her attitude (kissing, fingering, depth and withdrawal) is such that she'll never make it on my HL.
Thx for the review

Offline Brumish

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,776
  • Likes: 17
  •  
  • Reviews: 11
Thanks for the review Alabama.
Makes me wonder, we've now had at least a couple of generations of our beautiful ROMs gracing us with their beauty, could they possibly have an institution that teaches them how to escort. :crazy:
Banned reason: Last review 2020 lucky not banned for arranging social meets / telegraph group
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline alabama1

Your review and your choice but sounds more like a neg to me. Don't know if I  read it incorrectly but the way you describe some moments she sounds more snappy than friendly to me. Might have a cracking body but her attitude (kissing, fingering, depth and withdrawal) is such that she'll never make it on my HL.
Thx for the review
Cheers mate. Yes, i agree, the things you mention are big hurdles to overcome if anyone decides to see her. She wasn't snappy, that's what puzzles me, she actually had a nice attitude. Even the bollocking she gave me for sucking instead of licking her clit, was done with a smile.  :D Maybe her body (which i personally found fantastic), has clouded my judgement, as up until this morning i was still considering whether or not make the review a weak positive. I know ! i know ! lol

Offline alabama1

Thanks for the review Alabama.
Makes me wonder, we've now had at least a couple of generations of our beautiful ROMs gracing us with their beauty, could they possibly have an institution that teaches them how to escort. :crazy:
Cheers mate. Maybe they all go on the escort 'Lite' course, as opposed to the 'full fat' version.  :D

Offline shed

Good review as always. For me a no brainer negative if she removed your cock while cumming. Completely ruins the punt for me.  :hi:

Offline alabama1

Good review as always. For me a no brainer negative if she removed your cock while cumming. Completely ruins the punt for me.  :hi:
Thanks. Why do they do that  :unknown: So frustrating, as she has so much potential. I think it's a sign of the times that i am so easily pleased by mediocre wg's in Brum at the moment.  :(

Offline alibirmingham

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,654
  • Likes: 30
  •  
  • Reviews: 179
Thanks for the review Alabama, Gotta say she’s a dirty alright and can see why her good looks and charm have swayed a neutral.

But even with those looks her service sounds well below what I’d expect so not one for me.

Offline alabama1

Thanks for the review Alabama, Gotta say she’s a dirty alright and can see why her good looks and charm have swayed a neutral.

But even with those looks her service sounds well below what I’d expect so not one for me.
You are welcome Ali. And you are right. In general, physical attraction scores higher than performance with me, which is unfortunate at times.  :D

Offline pbrown355

I'm with alabama on that. An average service from a real hottie will probably get a neutral from me. Better service from one I don't find very attractive probably gets the same neutral.