Feature for UKP - top reviewed AW profiles all time/by year/by month

[thejunklord]

I did a quick search on the topic and nothing came up, so I assume this hasnt been asked before - apologies if it has.

A good feature to add to UKP would be a page showing the top reviewed AW profiles - all time/last 12 months/last 6 months/this month. I mention AW specifically because I have only seen those indexed, I assume the forum is build only to index AW and not all random websites. Having this would be quite useful I think to see who are the best/worst SPs out there and can essentially make all our horny lives a little easier 


Mods - if this is the wrong section for the topic, please move it.

[daviemac]

Not sure how it would make anyone's life easier, no matter how many reviews an SP has if she isn't your type you aren't going to book her.

How would you propose it worked? there's 12 different geographical areas and then escort, massage and TS review sections all that can have AW profiles.

Do you mean 36 different pages or all grouped into one?   

[scutty brown]

It might give academically interesting info, but I fail to see any real practical use.

There is another point - we already have a problem with the forum software being heavily bespoked and undocumented. Adding more bespoke programming may not be ideal.

[90125]

Maybe this can become a new ideas thread  ……





…… that we can ignore 

[thejunklord]

Not sure how it would make anyone's life easier, no matter how many reviews an SP has if she isn't your type you aren't going to book her.

How would you propose it worked? there's 12 different geographical areas and then escort, massage and TS review sections all that can have AW profiles.

Do you mean 36 different pages or all grouped into one? 

It might give academically interesting info, but I fail to see any real practical use.

There is another point - we already have a problem with the forum software being heavily bespoked and undocumented. Adding more bespoke programming may not be ideal.

@scutty - Ah! I get the issue with the bespoke nature of the forum stack then. This I didnt know and I see the headwind here.
@daviemac - With the software limitation in mind, your concerns are not solvable. Without any limitations, I was thinking about a page where you can select between three dropdowns 1. escort/massage/TS 2. Region 3. Timescale  and then the page refreshes to show the top reviewed SPs. But alas - its a mute point.

Maybe this can become a new ideas thread  ……
…… that we can ignore 

noted, worth a try I thought!

[daviemac]

@scutty - Ah! I get the issue with the bespoke nature of the forum stack then. This I didnt know and I see the headwind here.
@daviemac - With the software limitation in mind, your concerns are not solvable. Without any limitations, I was thinking about a page where you can select between three dropdowns 1. escort/massage/TS 2. Region 3. Timescale  and then the page refreshes to show the top reviewed SPs. But alas - its a mute point.
noted, worth a try I thought!

You still haven't said how it would benefit anyone, there's several in my area that would be top of the list of most reviews but would be of no interest to me.

The way I work is I find one I want to see then check here for reviews and if they're on AW the list of all their reviews is at the top of any one of them.

[Colston36]

You still haven't said how it would benefit anyone, there's several in my area that would be top of the list of most reviews but would be of no interest to me.

The way I work is I find one I want to see then check here for reviews and if they're on AW the list of all their reviews is at the top of any one of them.

I suppose if it was a list of "good at" naming their speciality it might help. Though I quite enjoy the odd half hour looking for women with a taste for exotic erotica who don't charge like the U.S. cavalry.

[thejunklord]

You still haven't said how it would benefit anyone, there's several in my area that would be top of the list of most reviews but would be of no interest to me.

The way I work is I find one I want to see then check here for reviews and if they're on AW the list of all their reviews is at the top of any one of them.

I work the other way around tbh, I generally start here because here, I get to see real reviews and obviously look for keywords that interest me to find the SPs. Top reviewed SPs would make this search easier i.e. finding the 'best' provider out there approach based on real reviews on UKP, go through the top providers and shortlist the few that works for me and then go to establishing contact from there. I am also based in London and hence the SP base is quite a lot and a top list would help in the first narrowing down process. Obviously, AW allows search based on ratings too, but limited experience has been AW reviews aren't reliable.

Perhaps in the future when software limitation goes away and if the team/user base sees value for this, it can be revisited

[akauya]

Maybe this can become a new ideas thread  ……


…… that we can ignore 

I have an idea. Let's add AI to UKP, we can call it ChatUKP.

It will answer questions like "Hot WG recommendation for today", (the questions that come without location, budget, preferences, likes/dislikes, etc.) ChatUKP will also give us stats on every WG in the country. It will save Mod's time 

[Steely Dan]

You seem to punt in London, thejunklord.  Just add the girls to the lists here

External Link/Members Only

There were pretty useful before Covid when some punters invested a bit of time.  A bit out of date. So just need you and a few more volunteers to update and all good.

[90125]

I work the other way around tbh, I generally start here because here, I get to see real reviews and obviously look for keywords that interest me to find the SPs. Top reviewed SPs would make this search easier i.e. finding the 'best' provider out there approach based on real reviews on UKP, go through the top providers and shortlist the few that works for me and then go to establishing contact from there. I am also based in London and hence the SP base is quite a lot and a top list would help in the first narrowing down process. Obviously, AW allows search based on ratings too, but limited experience has been AW reviews aren't reliable.

Perhaps in the future when software limitation goes away and if the team/user base sees value for this, it can be revisited

The limitation as you call it will not go away.

[daviemac]

I work the other way around tbh, I generally start here because here, I get to see real reviews and obviously look for keywords that interest me to find the SPs. Top reviewed SPs would make this search easier i.e. finding the 'best' provider out there approach based on real reviews on UKP, go through the top providers and shortlist the few that works for me and then go to establishing contact from there. I am also based in London and hence the SP base is quite a lot and a top list would help in the first narrowing down process. Obviously, AW allows search based on ratings too, but limited experience has been AW reviews aren't reliable.

Perhaps in the future when software limitation goes away and if the team/user base sees value for this, it can be revisited

Apart from the fact it isn't going to happen, the way you work is in my opinion crazy, what's the point of looking at profiles that don't interest you.

So what you are saying really is as long as enough people have posted positive reviews then you would be happy to see them, no matter what services they offer, what they look like or any other criteria you use.  Is the list in the punting wiki not enough?   

[thejunklord]

The limitation as you call it will not go away.

Case closed then.

Appreciate the time all

[Hollywell]

  :wacko:There's a Wikipedia page with a list of most rated  escorts and how ma y reviews on all sites. I don't know how to link it through I came across as it by mistake 

[daviemac]

:wacko:There's a Wikipedia page with a list of most rated  escorts and how ma y reviews on all sites. I don't know how to link it through I came across as it by mistake 

Reply #9