Author Topic: Classy Kate - Mayfair (London)  (Read 2584 times)


1 review(s) for Classy Kate (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline Mark.wilmots

URL: External Link/Members Only

Booking: 1 hour for £300

Comms: I called Kate where we spoke briefly and confirmed over text

Looks: Just wow, slender and beautiful. Believe natural breasts but I’m always bad at judging.

Location: Mayfair, about a 10 minute walk from Marble Arch. Spacious basement level flat in a residential neighbourhood. I think there is concierge facing you as you walk in luckily they weren’t at their desk.

Meet: The door opened to a 10/10 stunner. The pictures didn’t disappoint and she warmly greeted me as we made our way to the bedroom. After showering in a clean bathroom with fresh towels, found Kate laying on the bed in a sexy piece of lingerie. Some passionate foreplay, DFK and sloppy OW to start with, then we got into the main event in couple of positions before finishing. Took a breather and chatted, it’s at these times I always appreciate when the WG can speak English. Round 2 commended and finished on her small perky breasts.

Summary: Pricey punt but given the string of mediocre WGs I decided to push the boat for something really good as will need to stop for a few months. Was worth every penny.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2022, 06:16:32 pm by Mark.wilmots »

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,328
  • Likes: 720
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
URL: External Link/Members Only
This review is titled 'Classy Kate' if it isn't the Classy Kate in the linked profile who is it meant to be.   :unknown:

Offline puntingpumping1920

This review is titled 'Classy Kate' if it isn't the Classy Kate in the linked profile who is it meant to be.   :unknown:

 
I think he met this SP --- External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Banned reason: Mr £500k go and buy some fucking manners
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,328
  • Likes: 720
  •  
  • Reviews: 24

 
I think he met this SP --- External Link/Members Only6667120 or External Link/Members Only 
This is getting even more complicated, that ↑ link is the same one that he posted.    :unknown:     External Link/Members Only6667120

He reported the post and said it was the wrong url and it was indexed incorrectly but the name in the title and link match. 

Offline Goldfinch

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 13,344
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 26
This is getting even more complicated, that ↑ link is the same one that he posted.    :unknown:     External Link/Members Only6667120

He reported the post and said it was the wrong url and it was indexed incorrectly but the name in the title and link match.
Mark originally posted a link for 'Bella',but later modified his post and added the correct AW profile,when I noticed that,I removed the incorrect index,and added the correct one,unaware he had reported the post. :thumbsup:

Offline puntingpumping1920

Mark originally posted a link for 'Bella',but later modified his post and added the correct AW profile,when I noticed that,I removed the incorrect index,and added the correct one,unaware he had reported the post. :thumbsup:

You can remove A/W links ?

How do you do that
Banned reason: Mr £500k go and buy some fucking manners
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,328
  • Likes: 720
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Mark originally posted a link for 'Bella',but later modified his post and added the correct AW profile,when I noticed that,I removed the incorrect index,and added the correct one,unaware he had reported the post. :thumbsup:
Looking at it he changed the link in his post at 6.16 then reported it at 6.17.  You sorted the indexing out so nothing to report.   :unknown:


Offline Goldfinch

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 13,344
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 26
Looking at it he changed the link in his post at 6.16 then reported it at 6.17.  You sorted the indexing out so nothing to report.   :unknown:
:thumbsup: