Fuckme_carmenxo Glasgow

[Thepunteruk]

6 months ago.
Historical but merited review.

External Link/Members Only

Everything arranged and I turn up at the agreed location.
Contacted her 5 mins before to say to let me know when she was ready. 10/15 minutes later a message to say that the meeting was cancelled. Meeting didn't happen.

[Goldfinch]

Correct link:

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[Thepunteruk]

Altered, thank you GF

[Goldfinch]

Altered, thank you GF

[Punterperson1971]

She’s had 3 negatives in a row she should rename herself fuck me I can’t be bothered

[Problem Child]

Jesus dude, you’re coming across as a little bitter here. 
You already mentioned this cancellation in your last review, hence the neutral?
Seems a bit spiteful and petty  to do a further neg 

[daviemac]

6 months ago.
Historical but merited review.

Strikes me as a little suspect when you have only posted this after commenting on someone else's negative review. Any particular reason you did not post it at any time during the last six months.

The fact you have waited so long to post this and you calling another member a white knight does make it look like you have some sort of vendetta.

BTW I do believe you stated earlier that this punt was outside of the six month period.

[Thepunteruk]

I was prompted by others to leave a review.
I have prompted others to leave similar reviews, on different girls, to build up the bigger picture.

As per the rules, any arranged and confirmed booking that is not honoured by the SP, merits a negative review. I did initially mention it in another review. But as it was a completely separate incident, I feel within the ethos of the site, a separate record was required.

[Problem Child]

Oh c’mon, this incident clearly was part of your second review

“second review to register a few flaws this girl clearly has.
Hope that's ok, as a comment at the bottom of my previous review would likely be lost in translation.”

The message I got from that review was that you had 3 great, albeit delayed, bookings and one cancelled, so overall a “justified neutral”
You’re reviewing the same booking twice.

[Dman88]

Makes me question the validity of all his reviews knowing he uses it as a threat.

[Clattypats]

I was prompted by others to leave a review.
I have prompted others to leave similar reviews, on different girls, to build up the bigger picture.

As per the rules, any arranged and confirmed booking that is not honoured by the SP, merits a negative review. I did initially mention it in another review. But as it was a completely separate incident, I feel within the ethos of the site, a separate record was required.

You should have reviewed at the time if you felt that strongly about it...The ethos of the site is the same now as it was then...There is a hint of "sour grapes" about it all tbh... 

[Glesgaboy]

+1 Clatty.
He’s blowing this out of all proportion.
Def another agenda at play here by OP

[seeker]

 
Dum see dum
Dum dee daa

[Thepunteruk]

Guys, I'm caught between a rock and a hard place here.
Perpetuating the thread and keeping it to the top of the page = alternative agenda. Silence = guilty.
Clatty, we've both experienced her at her worst. The numbers are there as facts. If she wasn't 10/10 in the sack she would get no bookings or people defending her here.
Glesgaboy, we've messaged each other previously, you know I'm genuine. I feel she is getting defended when others wouldn't. That is all.
Let's just allow this to side down the page now. I have no desire to unnecessarily promote this review continually.