Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Passionate Naomi  (Read 9174 times)


6 review(s) for Passionate_Naomi (5 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline herbie007

I phoned Naomi this morning for a meet this afternoon which she was happy with, this is my second review about this girl on here, the other one was 6 months ago so thought I would do a new one.

The meeting was for 1 hour and cost £100, she used to work out of hotels but now has her own place in Sutton, it’s in a small block and easy enough to find, there’s pay and display parking on the same road at £1 per hour, the flat is nicely done up and clean.

Naomi is a gorgeous brunette polish girl, I would mark her as 9/10 for beauty, she has a slim size 8 to 10 figure with natural 36 C breasts, she states she is 26 and I believe her, she stands at about 5’8” without her heels on, IMO she is in tip top condition.

The meeting started with Naomi greeting me at the door with a kiss on the lips, we went through to the bedroom, I handed over the readies, and we started off with lots of DFK and feeling each other up whilst we got undressed, we moved onto the bed where this carried on, I then went down on her with a bit of fingering which she enjoyed until she come, she then gave me OWO whilst rubbing my balls, I told her I needed to shag her, so on with the rubber and we started off with CG, we then moved to mish with her legs around me whilst we DFK, 5 minutes of this and that was the end of round 1.

We had a little chat for a while and caught up with what we’ve been up to over the past 6 months since we last met, (she speaks excellent English by the way) then it was onto round 2 which was pretty much the same as round 1 until I had my second pop, which doesn’t happen to me very often in 1 hour meets.

As I have said above, Naomi has been reviewed before on UKP by my self and someone else, and I received a bit of criticism which is fair enough, as I mentioned you would have to make a bit of an effort to get the best out of her, but after today’s meeting no effort was needed, I had a great shag with a gorgeous girl.

 External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Offline Tailpipe

Thanks for the review , she looks very nice.


You have good taste.  :drinks:

Offline herbie007

Thanks for the review , she looks very nice.


You have good taste.  :drinks:


Thank you TP,

So have you, I like the looks of Paris B, Mary Jane and Michelle Independent that you've seen  :thumbsup:

Offline Tailpipe


Thank you TP,

So have you, I like the looks of Paris B, Mary Jane and Michelle Independent that you've seen  :thumbsup:

I have never seen ParisB, but I like how she posts , but the other two are nice for sure. You need to book Madlin if you have not already  :cool:

Offline herbie007

I have never seen ParisB, but I like how she posts , but the other two are nice for sure. You need to book Madlin if you have not already  :cool:


Sorry mate,

Don't know why I thought you had seen Paris B

I keep meaning to book Madlin but been busy with other girls but will get round to it hopefully next time she's around.  :drinks:

Jason

  • Guest
Below are the previous reviews – with chronological order- written about Naomi:

1. https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=11814
2. https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=12173
3. https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=13718
4. https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=18461

Naomi is not 26. She is 22 - she was born in 1991. I have seen her three times so far and one time after coming out of the shower she was speaking to a police officer over the phone giving him her full details. I heard her real name, actual date of birth etc but of course I am not going to make them public. Very good escort indeed, highly recommended (report number 2 above is mine).

Offline herbie007

I was meant to write 22 don't know why I said 26

password02

  • Guest
Hoping to see her in South London as my Christmas treat!!! review to follow if all goes ahead

Offline Jimmyredcab

Thanks for the review , she looks very nice.



I am pleased herbie had a good punt -------------------- but the pictures I can see are totally useless ---------- how on earth can you say she "looks nice".     :crazy:

Offline Jimmyredcab

Take this photo for example, as useful as a chocolate teapot.   :thumbsdown:

Hidden Image/Members Only

andrei

  • Guest
her gallery has plenty of pics you can see, picking one of her lying on a bed in a dress is just sneaky

Offline Jimmyredcab

her gallery has plenty of pics you can see, picking one of her lying on a bed in a dress is just sneaky

She has 18 pictures in her free gallery ---------------- all totally fucking useless.     :hi: :hi:

andrei

  • Guest
enlighten us as to what you believe a person should have displayed in their gallery then, their tonsils?

some of her pics show body but merely obscure the face, perfectly acceptable  :hi:

Offline Jimmyredcab

enlighten us as to what you believe a person should have displayed in their gallery then, their tonsils?

some of her pics show body but merely obscure the face, perfectly acceptable :hi:

To you maybe, not to me.   :hi:

Would you buy a shirt online if you could only see the cuffs ---------------- no of course you wouldn't.    :thumbsdown:

Offline random

Face pictures are always preferable, however I wouldn't call her pictures completely useless.   

Troyb

  • Guest
is this girl was working a couple years ago in Finchley road ? with Nicole ? for a very short time Kensington ?

don't remember her profile name , she was about 19 or 20

Offline Jimmyredcab

Face pictures are always preferable, however I wouldn't call her pictures completely useless.

OK, I will retract my comment ---------------------- let's say bordering on useless.    :hi: :hi:

Let me explain my point of view.
If we ALL refused to see girls who hide their face they would have to rethink ------------- put up proper photos or get a proper job.    :hi:

Jason

  • Guest
Naomi only sees regular clients until February (after she finishes her college exams) but perhaps she returned to full time escorting for December until Christmas. As I met her 4 times now, I can guarantee you that her face is beautiful. For comparison purposes her face score according to my beauty scale is 8.6/10-8.8/10. Here is my scale: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=18071.0

password02

  • Guest
Let me explain my point of view.
If we ALL refused to see girls who hide their face they would have to rethink ------------- put up proper photos or get a proper job.    :hi:
[/quote]

Yes Jimmy- Good luck with that!!! never going to happen

Offline herbie007

I am pleased herbie had a good punt -------------------- but the pictures I can see are totally useless ---------- how on earth can you say she "looks nice".     :crazy:





Hi Jimmy, Thanks

Re girls not showing their faces, I know where you’re coming from and you’re totally right, we are paying a lot of money to these girls, so we should be able to see up front what were paying for.

We all know there are some minger’s and B&S out there who have no choice and have to hide their faces otherwise they will get very little work, on the flip side there are some gorgeous girls out there who have no choice and have to hide their faces due to discretion.

IMO I’m willing to take a chance and see some of these WG's, otherwise I would have missed out on some great shag's such as Passionate Naomi, Nathalie 24, London Melanie, and of course the gorgeous Dee who turned out to be one of the most beautiful girls I have ever shagged, and I would recommend them all, and highly recommend Dee, even to you.  :thumbsup:


« Last Edit: December 18, 2013, 08:59:58 am by herbie007 »

Offline Jimmyredcab





Hi Jimmy, Thanks

Re girls not showing their faces, I know where you’re coming from and you’re totally right, we are paying a lot of money to these girls, so we should be able to see up front what were paying for.

We all know there are some minger’s and B&S out there who have no choice and have to hide their faces otherwise they will get very little work, on the flip side there are some gorgeous girls out there who have no choice and have to hide their faces due to discretion.

IMO I’m willing to take a chance and see some of these WG's, otherwise I would have missed out on some great shag's such as Passionate Naomi, Nathalie 24, London Melanie, and of course the gorgeous Dee who turned out to be one of the most beautiful girls I have ever shagged, and I would recommend them all, and highly recommend Dee, even to you.  :thumbsup:

I would not rule out EVERY girl without a face picture ---------------- but if it gets narrowed down to a couple of girls then the one with clear face pictures will win every time.
Their need for discretion is THEIR problem, not mine.    :drinks:

Offline jesus_jones

is this girl was working a couple years ago in Finchley road ? with Nicole ? for a very short time Kensington ?

don't remember her profile name , she was about 19 or 20

Yep. Was called Geena back then (not to be confused with Gina who also used to work in Finchley Road and now works in Barbican). Had some mixed feedback back then. She was a grumpy cow with me and finished so abruptly without letting me come, but she did do all of her services very well. Took a good fingerbanging and was into that, which was a highlight. Never again, though. Didn't smile once.

Jason

  • Guest
Yep. Was called Geena back then (not to be confused with Gina who also used to work in Finchley Road and now works in Barbican). Had some mixed feedback back then. She was a grumpy cow with me and finished so abruptly without letting me come, but she did do all of her services very well. Took a good fingerbanging and was into that, which was a highlight. Never again, though. Didn't smile once.

Naomi does not allow fingering her not even with surgeon gloves. And according to what she told me she escorted for one month in July 2012, then stopped and started again on regular basis in January 2013. She was in Kensington and Queensway/Bayswater hotels between January and May 2013, then went to Sutton.

Offline gonanigo

enlighten us as to what you believe a person should have displayed in their gallery then, their tonsils?

some of her pics show body but merely obscure the face, perfectly acceptable  :hi:

Honestly I don't know why you still entertain jimmy's thoughts on the quality of WGs' photos :lol:

Offline Jimmyredcab

Honestly I don't know why you still entertain jimmy's thoughts on the quality of WGs' photos :lol:

Maybe we should have more of your thoughts, in six months you have managed 11 posts.     :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Offline Silver Birch

To you maybe, not to me.   :hi:

Would you buy a shirt online if you could only see the cuffs ---------------- no of course you wouldn't.    :thumbsdown:

There are people who buy holidays without seeing the accommodation, sometimes not knowing the resort, and I'm not sure if some don't even know the country!

It is all about what each individual considers risk vs reward.

In an ideal world I would like to see faces, but I'm currently relying on the recommendations of other ukp members. So far, so good  :thumbsup:

Offline jesus_jones

Naomi does not allow fingering her not even with surgeon gloves. And according to what she told me she escorted for one month in July 2012, then stopped and started again on regular basis in January 2013. She was in Kensington and Queensway/Bayswater hotels between January and May 2013, then went to Sutton.

She's chatting shit. She was around for several months in 2012, working for a large group that ran brothels in Finchley Road, Paddington, Kentish Town and several other locations. She was in that Finchley Road flat for a long time. And yes, when I saw her she was perfectly comfortable with fingering.

I'm adamant it's the same girl. Blue eyes. Bad fringe. Eyes quite far apart. Tall. (I know how you like your descriptions).

Jason

  • Guest
She's chatting shit. She was around for several months in 2012, working for a large group that ran brothels in Finchley Road, Paddington, Kentish Town and several other locations. She was in that Finchley Road flat for a long time. And yes, when I saw her she was perfectly comfortable with fingering.

I'm adamant it's the same girl. Blue eyes. Bad fringe. Eyes quite far apart. Tall. (I know how you like your descriptions).

Naomi does not have blue eyes and her eyes are not far apart. Troyb told me in a Private Message that the girl she saw in Finchley Rd suffers from very light Strabismus. But Naomi’s eyes are perfect. Well at least myself in four 2h meetings with her I was unable to spot any noticeable strabismus and I also recognised the colour of her eyes as green. But perhaps now you might say that she corrected strabismus via surgery or so and that she is wearing green contact lenses. Anyway I am 99.9% sure that you are confusing her with a different girl.

Offline jesus_jones

Naomi does not have blue eyes and her eyes are not far apart. Troyb told me in a Private Message that the girl she saw in Finchley Rd suffers from very light Strabismus. But Naomi’s eyes are perfect. Well at least myself in four 2h meetings with her I was unable to spot any noticeable strabismus and I also recognised the colour of her eyes as green. But perhaps now you might say that she corrected strabismus via surgery or so and that she is wearing green contact lenses. Anyway I am 99.9% sure that you are confusing her with a different girl.

Im not the only one saying it. Check the other reviews, Bratpack seemed sure it's the same girl, and Troy even seemed to recognise her. A face picture would resolve things. Or maybe I'll pay her a visit if her service has improved.

There's no need for sarcastic bullshit. Relax.

Jason

  • Guest
Im not the only one saying it. Check the other reviews, Bratpack seemed sure it's the same girl, and Troy even seemed to recognise her. A face picture would resolve things. Or maybe I'll pay her a visit if her service has improved.

There's no need for sarcastic bullshit. Relax.

No sarcastic bullshit at all. I can’t be 100% sure for someone’s past. But I know what I see. As for face pics here is what comes closest. Funny enough it’s Naomi’s eyes that are the most beautiful feature on her face.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Naomi also has saggy tits if that helps. The type of saggy that if you f*ck her in doggy style the tits will move unpredictably back and forth, left to right and vice versa. Still big and nice looking tits though.
« Last Edit: December 18, 2013, 10:26:58 pm by Jason »

Offline jesus_jones

No sarcastic bullshit at all. I can’t be 100% sure for someone’s past. But I know what I see. As for face pics here is what comes closest. Funny enough it’s Naomi’s eyes that are the most beautiful feature on her face.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Naomi also has saggy tits if that helps. The type of saggy that if you f*ck her in doggy style the tits will move unpredictably back and forth, left to right and vice versa. Still big and nice looking tits though.

Thanks for the pictures. Looking at them closely, and taking into account your saggy tits comments, I'm even more sure its the same girl. She's quite tall, right? Like 5ft 9. The fringe, her mouth, teeth are all exactly like her.

Jason

  • Guest
Thanks for the pictures. Looking at them closely, and taking into account your saggy tits comments, I'm even more sure its the same girl. She's quite tall, right? Like 5ft 9. The fringe, her mouth, teeth are all exactly like her.

Yes, Naomi is 5ft9in (i.e. 1.75m) tall. The first picture (on the left) is the most representative of her face.

Offline herbie007

Hi Jesus and Jason

I’ve seen Naomi 3 times, the first being May of this year, I do not recall anything being wrong with her eyes, I thought she had nice eyes, she also didn’t have any problem with me fingering her either, which I was doing whilst I was going down on her, in fact she seemed to enjoy it as it helped her to reach an orgasm.

On the 3 occasions I have seen her she was a happy girl, and I am planning to have my 4th meeting with her soon.

As I mentioned in my review at the start of this thread, Naomi is a gorgeous girl, if I had to score her out of 10, I would say she is 9/10.

Hope this helps.


Jason

  • Guest
The very first time I saw her she refused fingering despite me insisting. I even stopped temporarily and brought from my bag a sealed package of a pair of non-powdered surgeon gloves and she still refused fingering. (nb. I always carry latex gloves and condoms with me during punts). In the subsequent encounters I assumed that she simply doesn’t offer fingering at all so I never asked her about it. But good to know for the fifth visit.

Offline Jimmyredcab

There are people who buy holidays without seeing the accommodation, sometimes not knowing the resort, and I'm not sure if some don't even know the country!

Not me, I would spend a couple of hours on Trip Advisor and You-Tube before spending hundreds of pounds.    :hi:

Offline jake9jake9

I saw her recently and agree with most of what's already been said. She's definitely beautiful and attractive, though a bit cold. Services were all delivered as requested, but would've liked more enthusiasm like eye contact when giving bj (she has really wonderful eyes).

I do think though, if you get to know her more she'd warm up. Personally would return.

mrhappypants

  • Guest
My two penneth, I think Jason and others are over rating how pretty she is.  She has a very nice body but would not get past a 7.5 on Jason's scale in my view.  She was also very nervous when we met which showed in her not smiling -  it took an absolute agefor her to warm up.  This aside good service and very well dressed.

Splosh

  • Guest
Jimmy is right of course in a perfect world every ad would have a face pic but for obvious reasons that's not going to happen, I'm not aware of any punter on here using their passport pic as their avatar.  The pics of Naomi on this thread and the descriptions of those who have met her are enough to convince me she is attractive but the killer blow is the comments about her being cold and unenthusiastic at least the first time you meet her.