Sugar Baby?
Masaj
Shemales

Author Topic: Natalya of Bayswater  (Read 2897 times)


60 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6440107) (49 positive, 5 neutral, 4 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline willie8

External Link/Members Only

I met this lovely young woman at a Hotel she uses near Queensway.

Frankly I was gobsmacked. I had asked her to wear a mini skirt, heels and some of that lovely lingerie in the images on her Web page. She was dressed just as requested including bear legs which I prefer to stockings.

I was keen to grab a handful of that great looking arse and so my hand was up her skirt pretty quickly. This quickly led her to take off her top and I helped her out of the skirt.

With easier access to her but and knowing she liked being spanked I was soon giving her a few meaningful though not hard spanks.

My turn to undress and then into the bed abd somewhere along the way her bra vanished.

I can confirm that Nat has gorgeous nipples which she loves being sucked given the noises she was making.

Next my turn which alternated between DFK which she loves and her sucking me off.

It all ended fairly quickly with her head back in the pillow and my dick going in and out of her mouth. She dies take it fairly deep and soon I was unloading a weeks worth of sticky stuff into her mouth.

Nat headed to the bathroom to rinse out.

Frankly I was spent and I need to return to get inside her panties

Not as young as I was and my first punt for 2 years.

In summary then she is gorgeous, really up for it and will show you a good time but please be kind to her.

Offline Payyourwaymate

"please be kind to her". Natalya stop telling these guys to review you FFS. We get it.

And you OP.... 5 years a member and you came out of hibernation to post this chick who we know is telling members to review her? You don't care about us at all, did you not think before posting this shit?

I'm so tempted to report you for touting. You are a waste of space for a member. This is too blatant  :dash: :dash: :dash:.

Offline bonapati

"please be kind to her". Natalya stop telling these guys to review you FFS. We get it.

And you OP.... 5 years a member and you came out of hibernation to post this chick who we know is telling members to review her? You don't care about us at all, did you not think before posting this shit?

I'm so tempted to report you for touting. You are a waste of space for a member. This is too blatant  :dash: :dash: :dash:.
+1
If I am allowed to jump on your thread (apologies if I’m not).
This is very true. Even the veterans are joining in too.
Are we seeing a new wave of “forum darlings” for 2022 springing up.


Natalya, Natalie, N…

Offline Payyourwaymate

+1
If I am allowed to jump on your thread (apologies if I’m not).
This is very true. Even the veterans are joining in too.
Are we seeing a new wave of “forum darlings” for 2022 springing up.


Natalya, Natalie, N…

It's not my thread, you can post where you like. She is not a forum darling. OP has been about leeching for years, decides to try and do a WG a favour by posting this nonsense after all the information he has taken from us. He can take his review and shove it up his arse. His review has no credibility in my eyes. He should have been smart enough to not do the review with his contribution levels. He clearly had time to seek this WG from her other reviews leeching, has posted 3 reviews (this included) in 5 plus years and this one is clearly a favour to her asking us to treat her well so it's more really like 2 reviews. Surely this WG must have had enough business from this site to have regulars, she needs to get her regs, fuck off and stop telling members to review her.

If this member was a solid standing member I would not have said anything bar the "please be kind to her" line.

With the exception of JackSaint, Nuruguru, dizietsmae and PLeisure; the rest of the members that have reviewed her have been long term or short members with little contribution suddenly coming out to review her randomly. I'm not making this up, look at the rest of the reviewers history.

Any review I see of this WG coming from a member with no history of contribution from this point on I'll call them out and suspect them of touting. They need to be able to justify why they are reviewing this WG when we know she is telling punters to review her. Writing fluffy reviews with the request of treat her well....such bullshit.
« Last Edit: December 15, 2021, 10:50:03 pm by Payyourwaymate »

Offline arrow0404

“Please be kind to her” - OP/Natalya tut tut you almost had us there

Offline Crackanut

Yuck! This is cringe if you're only saying it because she's asked.

Offline PLeisure

I'm going to jump in here...
It was me that encouraged OP to post a review. The reasons were:
Soon after I filed mine, he PM'd me to ask questions. At that point, it could have gone either way
  • Ask why his review count is so low despite 5+ years of membership; which could be construed as leeching
  • Push him to submit a review and see how he responds
I opted for the latter and provided answers to his many enquiries about this WG.

A couple of weeks passed since they met and I was beginning to wonder what OP's intentions were, i.e. intel sharing, or himself.
So yesterday I PM'd him to ask. There was another explanation for the delay and I offered some advice, then asking him for a timeline when to expect the review.

To his credit, he posted his review 20mins later.
I did not, however, suggest that he concludes it in the way that he has   :timeout: :sarcastic:

In the same way that the world's 2nd largest online retailer is automatically masked on here, perhaps there is a way to obliterate this redundant advice and place the offender on 14-day ban.   :D
The last two reviews for this WG have fallen foul of this bizarre gesture. She may be petite but is probably very capable of looking after herself when it comes to unsavoury people. Which very few UKP members are, of course  :angelgirl:

Offline Swapmeister

At least he didn't post ' please treat her with respect '  :-)

Offline rioja

Little surprise that some people are reluctant to post, if this is the reception they get.


Offline Fuzzyduck

Little surprise that some people are reluctant to post, if this is the reception they get.

It was because of reviews like this on another site that UKP was set up in the first place. God forbid this forum starts morphing back into the fluffy, biased load of bollocks it distanced itself from in the first place.

Offline Payyourwaymate

Little surprise that some people are reluctant to post, if this is the reception they get.

Not really, his review belongs with AW feedback. Not here. He did not post that review for our benefit.