Canadian Desires .........or maybe not

[PK59]

External Link/Members Only

Saw the profile and the pics looked ok so I fired off an email , she responded and said she liked to get to know someone first so I suggested we texted for a while .............this is where it went downhill ,first she said she had a rescue dog and was i allergic so I made some crack about liking dogs but sometimes they dont like me .........then she said if you unsettle my dog I would have to ask you to leave . I changed the subject and asked her when she was available , so she said she would have to ask me for at least half the fee in advance and ideally the whole amount .  I said I wasnt comfortable with this and she then  went on a rant about wasting her time and that most people are considerate about her dog etc etc

i think i dodged a bullet here ................ 

[GingerNuts]

You didn't have a confirmed booking then?

[PK59]

No - she wouldnt confirm a booking until we had texted a while

[GoldTop]

No - she wouldnt confirm a booking until we had texted a while

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meet does not need to take place, and money does not need to change hands. The only criteria are that she had accepted the initial booking

[Dipper]

Each to their own but an average wank would beat seeing that monster. I’m sure.   

[GingerNuts]

No - she wouldnt confirm a booking until we had texted a while

As redmoose said:

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meet does not need to take place, and money does not need to change hands. The only criteria are that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months ( for new members, this rule is currently relaxed to 12 months)after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain either a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).

I've moved this thread to regional discussion.

[KerachiDope]

She looks fine af but that 150 quid for an hour of fun put me off.

[Charliehutton]

Even in an era when mental health is of our primary concern.....she sounds fucking  barmy to me.

[hunkybc]

She looks a little too heavy and definitely larger than in her pictures...

[Dipper]

She looks a little too heavy and definitely larger than in her pictures...

The thinner looking picture has to have been tampered with.

[l1mpd1ck]

I saw this one several years ago.  I didn't report at the time.  (The problem with reporting too soon after a visit, especially to an independent, is that it is obvious who you are.  However, by leaving it a few weeks to preserve some anonymity it is easy to forget.

However, if I had done a review it would have been neutral at best.  She wasn't great looking and was pretty self obsessed.  Sex was OK but not that enthusiastic. It was all pretty amateur but at a professional price.