Read the rules guys, I've broken none of them and what I've included is entirely down to me.
I never asked for feedback, but it appears everyone feels obliged to add one to increase their posts.
If you don't like what I write, hit back button and start writing some of your own.
Mikey, I think the point the gentlemen are trying to make above is that although your review, indeed any review is appreciated, it's a bit on the sparse side. No one's knocking the fact that you review, indeed you've posted more than I have, so I'm not criticising that.
But there's a minimum amount of information that you need to convey in order to make it useful to the reader. Below which, it ceases to be genuinely informative and the accusation that you're just piling up your review count starts to hold water.
You did make five points:
a) She is still about
b) She is as good as ever.
c) Services as per her profile
d) Not rushed
e) A pleasurable response.
One of those was stating the obvious (a), one just states that what you previously said still holds (b), which is useful to know but doesn't add anything over what you've previously stated; a couple of genuinely useful ones
(c and d

), though without mentioning which of (c) you partook, and a somewhat useful one (e)
For comparison and keeping it neutral, picking one at random from someone who's posted about the same as myself, mgalaxy's response to my previous recent review of an SP contained over 60 (sixty) useful points to the prospective reader:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=321348.0I guess you're ultimately being bashed up a bit for the frugality of your review as it was information-light and didn't really tell us much you'd not already stated. Not all reviews need to be as fact filled as the one I've highlighted, or as wordy as some of my own. But maybe making at least ten to a dozen useful points which will help others to base a decision on is probably a decent guideline, if that doesn't sound overly-critical. And just to reiterate, time taken to write even short reviews is appreciated by everyone here, but they do need to have more than just a scraping of substance, otherwise they're not very useful for their intended purpose, hence the criticisms that have been expressed.
With regards to increasing our post count, there's no benefit to doing that (that I'm aware of), so what would be the point? But if there is, I'll concede that one and take it on the chin.
