ScottishSachax Bristol

[cockburn]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Had reservations following recent comments but it was fine in the end

COMMS

Called and received text, arranged booking for the following day

LOCATION

Private flat near Bristol city centre

MEET
3rd week September £120/1hr

Arrived 20 minutes early, she responded to texts, I was asked to wait until 5 past the hour. Later discovered the neighbours hang out outside her flat, she waits for them to go.

I was made to feel at ease and freshened up.

A few house rules reported elsewhere, she is not keen on touching nipples and clit.

The meet was a bit bonkers, she interrupted the session 3 times for a pee and once for Amazon!

Anyway, started with OWO, amazing technique, kept changing position, then rimming and back to OWO, then Amazon delivery! I’d be annoyed if I lost wood, but she returned swiftly and continued where she left off. I was invited to lick her pussy but it whiffed of pee (if you’re reading this Sash, wash yer gash). Rubbered up then several positions: her favourite on her front, doggy then popped in mish.   
Although A levels advertised and requested, she declined claiming she was tight and I was big. This has happened a few times recently, do I have grounds to complain under the Trades Description Act?

After 5 minutes rest, she started for round 2. I thought it was unlikely, but she revived me with OWO then reverse cowgirl, although I couldn’t pop 2nd time.

Pleasantly surprised to be asked for paperwork at the end rather than at the start.

Freshened up and left.

[Scootersx]

Sash,wash your gash !! Priceless!   

[tigerbiker]

A pissy minge is a negative in my book - you paid £120 and she could not be bothered to sloosh her toosh in the bath/shower - ie could not care attitude.

I have seen her before and was thinking of re-booking but you have saved me £120 to spend elsewhere - thanks

[welshpunter17]

whats Axxxxxx ?

I remember asking her about anal and I got the response "you're too big sweety". She must strugglewith it as I've not been declined it before

[Fuzzyduck]

whats Axxxxxx ?

I remember asking her about anal and I got the response "you're too big sweety". She must strugglewith it as I've not been declined it before

There's a well known internet retailer that can't be quoted on here. Not sure why, but I don't care enough to ask or find out. It's only mildly annoying when you want to use the word to describe an athletic, statuesque woman.

[lamboman]

whats Axxxxxx ?

Jeff Bezos' delivery company.

[welshpunter17]

Ohhhhhh, I thought OP was being kind and censoring out "A shit" 

[JimmySW]

There's a well known internet retailer that can't be quoted on here. Not sure why, but I don't care enough to ask or find out. It's only mildly annoying when you want to use the word to describe an athletic, statuesque woman.

It's so that Google searches for that company don't end up here (I think)

[Fuzzyduck]

It's so that Google searches for that company don't end up here (I think)

sounds sensible.

Reading the review again, it sounds like she had some trouble downstairs. Needing to piss 3 times in an hour? Stinky pussy? No wonder OP declined RO. That punt would have have been a neutral at best for me.

[bristolnick]

Ohhhhhh, I thought OP was being kind and censoring out "A shit" 

Same! I was going to ask if she took that time out of the session!

[HawkG]

This review is exactly why the detail matters so much more than the positive/neutral/negative rating, and this is why reports that are light on detail aren’t useful.  The detail here means this one is really useful.

The o.p. rates it positive as is his prerogative. He liked it, he scores +ve, that’s cool and we shouldn't argue with that.

But the detail explains clearly why one should give her a swerve as the pissy vag, and possible urine infection, result in a no for me.

[HawkG]

-

[Dickie1985]

That exactly what I thought he was talking about😂 “she had to stop 3 times for a piss and once for a shit.   

[Jeremy]

This review is exactly why the detail matters so much more than the positive/neutral/negative rating, and this is why reports that are light on detail aren’t useful.  The detail here means this one is really useful.

The o.p. rates it positive as is his prerogative. He liked it, he scores +ve, that’s cool and we shouldn't argue with that.

But the detail explains clearly why one should give her a swerve as the pissy vag, and possible urine infection, result in a no for me.

I agree. I was interested in seeing her but this has put me off to be honest.

[notcalledchris]

Sasha has the potential to be a really good sp.  If she sorted her shit out she would be great

[lamboman]

Her face still looks like it's been literally screwed up to me,perhaps it's just a bad photo.

[welshpunter17]

Her face still looks like it's been literally screwed up to me,perhaps it's just a bad photo.

Its just the photo, she actually looks great in person

[lamboman]

Its just the photo, she actually looks great in person

 

[Palace123]

a very generous "positive" there....bad hygiene is an instant fail for me...as is not providing said services used to attract clients (when not given reason not to)