Author Topic: Chanel Amore - E14 Canary Wharf - Another Try  (Read 4114 times)


4 review(s) for your_girl_chanel (1 positive, 0 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by WARSZAWA16]
4 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6248968) (1 positive, 0 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by puntingpumping1920]

Offline Momodan38

Link - External Link/Members Only

Price - £150 for 30 mins.

Location - Google showed around 17 min walk from Canary Wharf DLR. I took an Uber.

Comms - Via text and then had to call when I arrived.

Residence - standard prossie house. Old building but clean inside.

The Girl - It’s definitely the same girl from the pictures but she does not live up to it in the flesh IMHO. She was not all done up with make up when I met her, so looked very plain. She has tattoos and enhanced C cup tits.

Services Discussed - Possible FK as it is at her discretion and OWO.

Services Recieved - Only OWO (barely) and Sex.

The Meet - Arrived on time but was made to wait a further 15 minutes outside. She seems to run a conveyor belt type service. There seemed to be other punters waiting outside building. By what I could gather from overhearing them, they both just had seen an SP. I could be wrong, just a hunch.

After waiting I get the message from the SP directing me to the building. The session itself was really bland. I tried to initiate some FK but she just gave me her cheeks. She directs me to the bed and gives me an OWO that probably lasted 15 seconds. She puts in the rubber when I was not fully erect and carries on with a subpar OW. I got up and worked on her breasts and feet. Had a really hard time getting hard proper. She showed zero reaction and emotion. She was just there with an expressionless face. In the end I asked her to give me a HJ. It took a while but I managed to get to the finish line in end with a semi.

All in all it’s a negative. I can excuse the lack of kissing as she made it clear it’s at her discretion before the meet. However, she made me wait, gave a really crap BJ and just seemed to be in another world during the session.


Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only

« Last Edit: May 21, 2021, 01:42:50 pm by Momodan38 »

Offline last_days_of_logan


Offline massagepuntingfan

Thanks for the review, sounds shite and reminded me of the awful punts I’ve had over the years.
She works with this girl, who has been on my HL for a while due to her massive knockers.
External Link/Members Only
I initially matched with her on seeming and her comms were dreadful, bored and disinterested. Soon after saw her on AW, there used to be a link to the SP you reviewed as a duo partner. I did a two minute cam with her, again she was bored, arrogant and disinterested.
I’d imagine the queue is for both women and I’d wager majority if not all have a similarly crap experience. Also worth noticing their price structure is up and down like a yo-yo. Will def avoid both.

Offline Momodan38

sounds awful mate
It was awful indeed :thumbsdown:

Also worth noticing their price structure is up and down like a yo-yo. Will def avoid both.
I’ve noticed this too. Since I spotted her the hourly would change from £200 to as high as £300. Her 30 min rate was always the same however.

Offline bst

Damn. Sorry for the bad punt. I guess it's even worse when on paper it's promising.

Silver lining is I assume her 1hr was up at 300 at the time, which made you take 30 mins only.

These are her new credentials right? External Link/Members Only External Link/Members Only
There's quite a few of them in this defacto group. The Polish girl with huge knockers that was cited being one of them.
Wonder if they are pimped albeit at a higher level. I think that put me off from seeing them - so thank you to my new hotlist parameters for not punting her.

External Link/Members Only this one was with them but has fled the nest, and now has my attention.
Banned reason: Doesn’t listen to warnings
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline bst

Just seen it was a double dip negative too, after being no showed the first time. Yikes.

I guess the negative-positive experience with Teacola Rose had you taking a... punt
Banned reason: Doesn’t listen to warnings
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Momodan38

Just seen it was a double dip negative too, after being no showed the first time. Yikes.

I guess the negative-positive experience with Teacola Rose had you taking a... punt
LOL yes. Not just that, she’s was very conveniently located. Like 10 mins away from Uber. So thought it was worth a try. Teacola, I just thought she was hot, well I her pictures anyway.

As for your other post, I can’t remember what price range she was at for her hourly rate, I just remember it kept changing from £200 to £250 to £300 on several occasions. Her 30 mins rate was the only consistent thing about her. I chose that as I knew she would be a simple P&D.

That other profile you mentioned is not her. They may be part of the same group but not the same person.


Offline bst

Eh? You sure? Two of the pics are the same (lollipop and blue lingerie).
First profile (Sky_xxx) is what must be her.
Second profile Nylon queen whatever was an aside, maybe I caused confusion there.
« Last Edit: June 16, 2021, 10:24:23 am by bst »
Banned reason: Doesn’t listen to warnings
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Momodan38

Sorry your right. I looked at the wrong profile, the other one you linked who’s part of the same group!

Guess she’s going for a rebrand after all.

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,622
  • Likes: 372
  •  
  • Reviews: 209
UKP works its magic, profile already gone, she'll probably set up another one.

Offline Momodan38

UKP works its magic, profile already gone, she'll probably set up another one.
bst already provided new link -

These are her new credentials right? External Link/Members Only

Offline bst

The new profile might literally be running from your negative review. So UKP works its magic again as above said.
Banned reason: Doesn’t listen to warnings
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline The_Don

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,484
  • Likes: 68
  •  
  • Reviews: 250
Current profile format


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

07784130108

Quote
Dinner Dates
Foot Worship
French Kissing (discretion)
Humiliation (giving)
Lapdancing
Massage
Modeling
Oral without (at discretion)
Parties
Penetration (Protected)
Pole Dancing
Watersports (Giving)



Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline bundaskwilz

Damn. Sorry for the bad punt. I guess it's even worse when on paper it's promising.

Silver lining is I assume her 1hr was up at 300 at the time, which made you take 30 mins only.

These are her new credentials right? External Link/Members Only External Link/Members Only
There's quite a few of them in this defacto group. The Polish girl with huge knockers that was cited being one of them.
Wonder if they are pimped albeit at a higher level. I think that put me off from seeing them - so thank you to my new hotlist parameters for not punting her.

External Link/Members Only this one was with them but has fled the nest, and now has my attention.

The twitter link you posted isn't the same girl
That's livvy on AW she's english
External Link/Members Only

And her friend nylon queen is also




Offline bst

The twitter link you posted isn't the same girl
That's livvy on AW she's english
External Link/Members Only

And her friend nylon queen is also

You're right about the twitter my bad. But the new AW (which has now also been deleted) was who this review is about for sure.

EDIT: I doubt I could have got it so wrong and had no one else pick up on it. I reckon the prossie this review is about has now disappeared into the mist, and Livvy has taken her twitter @ for one reason or another. Not impossible given they are both Nylon Queen's mate by the look of it.
Either way looks like Chanel/Sky has been dropped from their group in the aftermath of Momo's review Loool
« Last Edit: July 16, 2021, 12:10:38 pm by bst »
Banned reason: Doesn’t listen to warnings
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline bundaskwilz

You're right about the twitter my bad. But the new AW (which has now also been deleted) was who this review is about for sure.

EDIT: I doubt I could have got it so wrong and had no one else pick up on it. I reckon the prossie this review is about has now disappeared into the mist, and Livvy has taken her twitter @ for one reason or another. Not impossible given they are both Nylon Queen's mate by the look of it.
Either way looks like Chanel/Sky has been dropped from their group in the aftermath of Momo's review Loool

No doubt the aw link was the same In the review.. I saw livvy and nylon  queen for a duo back In April and the twitter was hers then as well

the girl in the review works with another big titted girl also named liv i think.

Offline bst

Yeah the girl in the review was definitely in the new profile I linked in reply 4, made clear by The_Don's reply 12.

These are her new credentials right? External Link/Members Only External Link/Members Only

Only question is why I attributed Livvy's twitter to her oddly. Not saying she took over the account, just that @ could have changed. Unless you know for sure that Livvy was calling herself Goddess Laura Jane back then.

Would be good to see your review on Nylon Queen. Don't think she has been reviewed on here. Judging by the review/s I saw on Livvy, I feel like a threesome with those two could be anything from excellent to underwhelming Lol.
Banned reason: Doesn’t listen to warnings
Banned by: Kev40ish