Sugar Baby?
Masaj
Shemales

Author Topic: Review Quality gone down the shitter  (Read 1980 times)

Offline samneil15

Just making an observation- used to love reading reviews of my fellow punters, looks, location, action, it's all needed to help the rest of us.

I'm getting sick of noobs doing 2 line reviews, or even worse, war and peace, but never describing the action at any point.

Can we up our game please lads ffs. Otherwise, this once great resource for punters will turn to shit.

Offline Prestonlad327

I must say I’m in agreement, quality’s slipping, but some info is better than non I suppose!

Offline Moby Dick

Wotzup, Falling behind on your wanking quotas?  :sarcastic:

Offline samneil15

Wotzup, Falling behind on your wanking quotas?  :sarcastic:

Hey Moby, I think it's due to the fact that I think the "talent" in Manchester is pretty shit atm and the reviews of newer girls are even worse.

Used to feel like I'd never get through my bucket list, but now I'm like meh.

Maybe we just need to tag team another pocket rocket again.  :unknown:

Offline Moby Dick

Hey Moby, I think it's due to the fact that I think the "talent" in Manchester is pretty shit atm and the reviews of newer girls are even worse.

Used to feel like I'd never get through my bucket list, but now I'm like meh.

Maybe we just need to tag team another pocket rocket again.  :unknown:
Sure but give Bolton and surrounding area a miss for a week or two.
Besides I need a few weeks to shed the lockdown blubber, can’t see my Dick at the Mo :thumbsdown:
« Last Edit: May 18, 2021, 05:18:01 pm by Moby Dick »

Offline samneil15

Sure but give Bolton and surrounding area a miss for a week or two.
Besides I need a few weeks to shed the lockdown blubber, can’t see my Dick at the Mo :thumbsdown:

 :lol:you fat shit. You're allowed to have a bit of gut mate at your age  :D

I agree about staying clear.

You know I'm up for it when you can see little Moby again, give me a shout  :lol:

Offline Exoticseeker121

I had the impression that people preferred shorter and on the point reviews. I've been criticised before for overly long reviews and was going to change it to something like the recent reviews. Guess there's a sweet spot to get it right.

Offline samneil15

I had the impression that people preferred shorter and on the point reviews. I've been criticised before for overly long reviews and was going to change it to something like the recent reviews. Guess there's a sweet spot to get it right.

The length of the review is irrelevant mate, it's the content. As long as all the necessary details have been hit then fine. I do like Cap Cavemans reviews though with the summary at the end.

Offline Exoticseeker121

The length of the review is irrelevant mate, it's the content. As long as all the necessary details have been hit then fine. I do like Cap Cavemans reviews though with the summary at the end.

That is a good template to work with. I'll try and model him with my future reviews. Looking to see a lass on Tuesday, I'll post it in that style and see what ppl think.

Offline Neo

What do you make of mine mate? I aint the best at descriptive writing to begin with instead I just write as much intel I can about the Wg

Offline samneil15

What do you make of mine mate? I aint the best at descriptive writing to begin with instead I just write as much intel I can about the Wg

Decent reviews Neo - Location, Price Looks, and then on to the meet. Maybe just put some more detail in the actual action section. Positions, attitude, skills etc but bang on really.

Not like I'm an expert but I think I hit all the necessary points.

Offline Neo

I think I've just had the misfortune of shit punts. You know that spark/wow factor? Maybe it's because its been quite dire in recent times. I do like to give a lot of detail pertaining to the run-up to the meet as this is Intel that'll help logistics. I'm heading across to Wigan towards the end of this week so I'm looking forward to punting in that neck of the woods for once.

Offline Access

I think I've just had the misfortune of shit punts. You know that spark/wow factor? Maybe it's because its been quite dire in recent times. I do like to give a lot of detail pertaining to the run-up to the meet as this is Intel that'll help logistics. I'm heading across to Wigan towards the end of this week so I'm looking forward to punting in that neck of the woods for once.
Be interested who you end up seeing as it’s not great in Wigan

Offline samneil15

I think I've just had the misfortune of shit punts. You know that spark/wow factor? Maybe it's because its been quite dire in recent times. I do like to give a lot of detail pertaining to the run-up to the meet as this is Intel that'll help logistics. I'm heading across to Wigan towards the end of this week so I'm looking forward to punting in that neck of the woods for once.

Bloody hell Neo just checked your reviews and I can see you've had a shitty run. I do think your WG choices are risky and the signs are there for some. You need to hit the well reviewed Manchester girls first before you start venturing to grim Wigan  :lol:

Hope your next one blows your socks off!!!

Offline boltonagain

Bloody hell Neo just checked your reviews and I can see you've had a shitty run. I do think your WG choices are risky and the signs are there for some. You need to hit the well reviewed Manchester girls first before you start venturing to grim Wigan  :lol:

Hope your next one blows your socks off!!!

He only reviews the shit ones then the diamonds he uncovers don’t get booked up, so he never misses out  :lol:

Offline samneil15

He only reviews the shit ones then the diamonds he uncovers don’t get booked up, so he never misses out  :lol:

I sincerely hope that nobody on this forum does such things..... Negates the whole point of the site.

Offline Moby Dick

I sincerely hope that nobody on this forum does such things..... Negates the whole point of the site.
Negatives are invaluable in my opinion.

Too many Positives leads to SP getting busy and pussy inflation

I’ve often thought that positives should be only visible to contributing members rather than being visible for any one to read, non members and leeches alike.

Negative can remain visible to everyone as a warning.

Offline Exoticseeker121

Bloody hell Neo just checked your reviews and I can see you've had a shitty run. I do think your WG choices are risky and the signs are there for some. You need to hit the well reviewed Manchester girls first before you start venturing to grim Wigan  :lol:

Hope your next one blows your socks off!!!

You think he had a bad run. I haven't had a good one for nearly 2 years thanks to Covid and my unlucky streak combined. Nearly thinking of giving up tbh.

Tuesday review is up. A no go but I did a TOFTT a gal who has quite a few webcam reviews on AW but we know we can't trust those. Review of that will be up later.

Offline Richthescouser

Negatives are invaluable in my opinion.

Too many Positives leads to SP getting busy and pussy inflation

I’ve often thought that positives should be only visible to contributing members rather than being visible for any one to read, non members and leeches alike.

Negative can remain visible to everyone as a warning.

Now this strikes me as a good idea. I know there are plenty of little groups that keep their new finds to themselves for a while, before posting reviews and sharing. Given how many people read and don’t contribute, I can see why.

Offline ISTS2005



I’ve often thought that positives should be only visible to contributing members rather than being visible for any one to read, non members and leeches alike.


I like this, however post count and review count aren't indicative of a good member. Think theres a lad on the Yorkshire forum I praised once for giving great intel about a place, but he had no reviews - hes still a contributing member and was able to advise a few others about a particular place and help them make informed decisions.

Its how you would go about setting a criteria for contribution, without getting idiots just spamming the life out of the board or writing shit reviews to qualify.

Offline Neo

He only reviews the shit ones then the diamonds he uncovers don’t get booked up, so he never misses out  :lol:

I wish! Least my wallet will feel a lot justified then. I'm just quite picky with who I see mate. A neutral is a fair score if given your reasoning.

Offline boltonagain

I wish! Least my wallet will feel a lot justified then. I'm just quite picky with who I see mate. A neutral is a fair score if given your reasoning.

it was said completely tongue in cheek mate, hence the laugh emoji

Offline Rack Admirer

The best reviews I've ever read were by "Man Meat", who used to review on a well known site that's not as popular as it was but is still going.

Beautifully written, VERY funny and really descriptive. I still read them occasionally, even though he hasn't done a new review in 6 years. They crack me up every time.

Worth checking out if you're bored and/or need a chuckle. No login is required for the site in question.
« Last Edit: June 02, 2021, 06:05:11 pm by Rack Admirer »

Offline Neo

it was said completely tongue in cheek mate, hence the laugh emoji

Ah my bad fella, worth taking a look at my latest review if you fancy a latina