English-Kareena93, Glasgow City Centre

[K.Jay50]

Communications: via text, responses were slow but I got through in the end


External Link/Members Only

Fee for Time: £90 for 30 mins + £20 for Swallow.

Location: Glasgow City, Hotel near the squinty bridge

Looks: She looks bigger than the pictures, more curvier

The Meet: She is half guyanese and half dutch (I initially thought she was indian tbh), Comms arranged via phone call, she seemed fine on the phone etc, I arranged for 15 past 7, which was fine, she is curvier in person, Meet started with handing over the money bang on 15 past 7, shower offered, I declined as I was going to have one after, Kissing  (no french), owo, Facesitting, Cowgirl then Doggy, I paid extra for swallow so the service should be offered right ? after CIM, she runs for the toilet and I hear a flush, if she didn't want to do it then that's fine but be honest about it instead of charing for something and then not providing it, and when I asked her if she swallowed, she swears she did yet why go to the toilet ? Also at this point I ask her how long I have left she says 4 minutes yet when I get outside the hotel, it's only 07:39 pm ? assuming it took 2-3 minutes to get out of the hotel so I essentially paid for a 21 minute meet ? Come on...this whole rush and go service isn't appropriate especially if someone is paying you for your time. Definitely not going back.

Main Reasoning for the meet: I usually go for established WGs but I wanted to try someone new as there are no reviews on her so I could give back to the people on the forum who constantly contribute and whose reviews have helped me.

K.Jay Signing off. Peace.

[S.X. MacHine]

Your review is valuable, so thankyou for that.
You awarded a ‘negative’, as I read it, purely on the basis that she did not swallow. Personally, based on the extensive services which were given, I’d have been inclined to a ‘neutral’. Still, it’s your review and your judgement.

[Gunner1]

She is half guyanese and half dutch (I initially thought she was indian tbh)

I seen this profile and I was about to meet her thinking the same then noticed she lists her Ethnicity. Not really my type so I avoided. Glad I did.

[Gunner1]

You awarded a ‘negative’, as I read it, purely on the basis that she did not swallow. Personally, based on the extensive services which were given, I’d have been inclined to a ‘neutral’. Still, it’s your review and your judgement.

He paid extra for Swallow which she never done. Profile says FK (at discretion) which she also never done. She isn’t cheap at £90 1/2 hr or in this case £110, I think a negative is justified.

[Jock D]

Your review is valuable, so thankyou for that.
You awarded a ‘negative’, as I read it, purely on the basis that she did not swallow. Personally, based on the extensive services which were given, I’d have been inclined to a ‘neutral’. Still, it’s your review and your judgement.

I think most discerning punters will read other peoples reviews and won't always agree with the rating they've given.

However, as you point out yourself, it's their review and their judgement. Therefore, imo, it's bad form to publicly question that rating...unless of course it's an obvious troll

[K.Jay50]

Your review is valuable, so thankyou for that.
You awarded a ‘negative’, as I read it, purely on the basis that she did not swallow. Personally, based on the extensive services which were given, I’d have been inclined to a ‘neutral’. Still, it’s your review and your judgement.

The negative is also because she ushered me out early lying that I have 4 minutes left when I had about 10 minutes left.

[PR67]

Personally, based on the extensive services which were given, I’d have been inclined to a ‘neutral’.

What 'extensive services' would that be? Seems a fairly straightforward punt with regular services. OWO, kissing, a few positions with CIM. If all it took to avoid a negative was to provide this then there wouldn't be that many negatives on this site apart from radio silence and bait and switch reviews. Also, providing those services doesn't mean that they're enjoyable and they obviously didn't outweigh the negatives mentioned in this review. I also checked your review history; you've never given a negative review based on services provided. Only time you ever gave a negative review was because the pics and age didn't match profile so you walked, which I commend as I'm shite at walking away. Maybe you've always had positive experiences but not the best position to be in when commenting on another punter's negative review.

OP, was it £20 extra for CIM or was it £20 to swallow specifically with CIM included in the regular rate?

[S.X. MacHine]

The negative is also because she ushered me out early lying that I have 4 minutes left when I had about 10 minutes left.

You make a fair point. I should’ve read your review more carefully. You were ripped off on timekeeping.
I was giving an opinion that she did offer a range of services which cannot be taken for granted in this age of beautiful, but often exploitative, Brazilian providers.
As I said, your punt, your rating; fair enough.

[K.Jay50]

What 'extensive services' would that be? Seems a fairly straightforward punt with regular services. OWO, kissing, a few positions with CIM. If all it took to avoid a negative was to provide this then there wouldn't be that many negatives on this site apart from radio silence and bait and switch reviews. Also, providing those services doesn't mean that they're enjoyable and they obviously didn't outweigh the negatives mentioned in this review. I also checked your review history; you've never given a negative review based on services provided. Only time you ever gave a negative review was because the pics and age didn't match profile so you walked, which I commend as I'm shite at walking away. Maybe you've always had positive experiences but not the best position to be in when commenting on another punter's negative review.

OP, was it £20 extra for CIM or was it £20 to swallow specifically with CIM included in the regular rate?

Hi,

it was specifically £20 extra to swallow, hence why I paid it and  OWO and CIM was included in the regular rate.

[K.Jay50]

You make a fair point. I should’ve read your review more carefully. You were ripped off on timekeeping.
I was giving an opinion that she did offer a range of services which cannot be taken for granted in this age of beautiful, but often exploitative, Brazilian providers.
As I said, your punt, your rating; fair enough.

if she had another meet after me, I would have understood and mentioned it but as i've said lad, the negative is because I didn't get what I paid for and I was lied to about the timing so I could be out early. Thank you for your insight though.

[Uncle Buck]

I think most discerning punters will read other peoples reviews and won't always agree with the rating they've given.

However, as you point out yourself, it's their review and their judgement. Therefore, imo, it's bad form to publicly question that rating...unless of course it's an obvious troll

+1