LolaWild XXX - Kensington

[bobita18]

External Link/Members Only
I saw her the end of 2020. The price its little bit high i paid £250 for 1 h. The girl is looking the same like her picture. She is a truly submissive girl and she doo everything from her list. She can take a good fuck on her ass, lots of DT, vaginal and anal fisting, rimming on me, spit on her slap her face and arse and in the end i piss on her in the shower. If you like to be dominant then she is your type.
Look 8/10
Service 10/10
Accommodation 10/10

[bobita18]

Sorry but i forgot to add something. Even the experience was nice and she deserve a positive for her services. You need to proceed with caution because she allows to cum in her holes also she asked to piss in her holes. We had protected sex but allowing exchanges of fluids is a massive risk for health!

[jamiekinkxxx]

To clarify... you are saying she said you could cum inside her, but you chose not to?

[Tomcat]

Sorry but i forgot to add something. Even the experience was nice and she deserve a positive for her services. You need to proceed with caution because she allows to cum in her holes also she asked to piss in her holes. We had protected sex but allowing exchanges of fluids is a massive risk for health!

I hope she has sense to be on prEP if you say she offers the above.

[Zen calm]

Hi OP. Yes please clarify this please as I was hoping to book her soon.

[Tomcat]

Hi OP. Yes please clarify this please as I was hoping to book her soon.

So prEP is a new drug available now after years of testing, available on the NHS or I think it can be purchased for around £60, basically it stops or blocks HIV from getting into your system, but in order for it to work you must be HIV negative if you are positive it's useless, now although it prevents catching HIV however it will not stop you catching any STD or STI.

External Link/Members Only

For those punts who are not aware of this new drug please type prEP in Google and read about it.

I could be wrong but prEP amied at sex workers and transgenders. 

I hope this helps.

[Zen calm]

So prEP is a new drug available now after years of testing, available on the NHS or I think it can be purchased for around £60, basically it stops or blocks HIV from getting into your system, but in order for it to work you must be HIV negative if you are positive it's useless, now although it prevents catching HIV however it will not stop you catching any STD or STI.

External Link/Members Only

For those punts who are not aware of this new drug please type prEP in Google and read about it.

I could be wrong but prEP amied at sex workers and transgenders. 

I hope this helps.

Sorry perhaps I didn't make myself clear. I am aware of what Prep is but wanted to know from the OP of the review if this SP actually offered unprotected sex as I would not want to risk seeing her if that was the case.

[Tomcat]

Sorry perhaps I didn't make myself clear. I am aware of what Prep is but wanted to know from the OP of the review if this SP actually offered unprotected sex as I would not want to risk seeing her if that was the case.

Its ok Zen, at least a little bit of education for those who didn't know.

[Momodan38]

I have seen her a few times. The offer of unprotected sex has never come up. This is a serious allegation. Is the OP sure this is what happened? I mean it sounds like English is your second language going by the way you have written your posts. So there could have been a language barrier. Also are sure you did not get confused whilst she was doing some dirty talk? Not specifying unptrotected sex, but things like “cum inside me”???

I have to admit my sessions where very vanilla so this may have not come up, but reading her other reviews and the fact that she has to maintain a reputation with all her agencies I highly doubt she would do something so stupid.

[Jonestown]

I have seen her a few times. The offer of unprotected sex has never come up. This is a serious allegation. Is the OP sure this is what happened? I mean it sounds like English is your second language going by the way you have written your posts. So there could have been a language barrier. Also are sure you did not get confused whilst she was doing some dirty talk? Not specifying unptrotected sex, but things like “cum inside me”???

I have to admit my sessions where very vanilla so this may have not come up, but reading her other reviews and the fact that she has to maintain a reputation with all her agencies I highly doubt she would do something so stupid.

The OP's review did read like a take down from a disgruntled client to me.

[Kev40ish]

Sorry but i forgot to add something. Even the experience was nice and she deserve a positive for her services. You need to proceed with caution because she allows to cum in her holes also she asked to piss in her holes. We had protected sex but allowing exchanges of fluids is a massive risk for health!

I am surprised you forgot to mention this little thing in you original review, probably an easy thing to forget 

Interesting name choice too, an Indian girls name?

[jamiekinkxxx]

I am surprised you forgot to mention this little thing in you original review, probably an easy thing to forget 

Interesting name choice too, an Indian girls name?

Maybe you are onto something Kev? The more I think about it the more maybe it doesn't quite add up? First post, First Review (Postive), Second Post (Probably the worst post an escort can have about them, esp if not true!)

[pa5151]

I've seen her 3-4 times. Never had a hint of bareback.

[Griffin75]

I’m not reading this as BB.
More the SP allowing cum or piss on her pussy and arsehole.
Still risky but more for her than him.

[bobita18]

Sorry about this debate. I don’t know if she does bb we used condoms. In the end i removed my condom and she told i can cum in her ass which i did! It was not a misunderstood.
Because of this maybe should be negative review  Thats why i said proceed with caution.

[Jonestown]

In the end i removed my condom and she told i can cum in her ass which i did!

Cum in her ass or Cum on/over her ass ?

[Momodan38]

Sorry about this debate. I don’t know if she does bb we used condoms. In the end i removed my condom and she told i can cum in her ass which i did! It was not a misunderstood.
Because of this maybe should be negative review  Thats why i said proceed with caution.

so now you say you have cummed inside her anal? Also you had unprotected anal sex? This is totally different from the your previous statement of her ‘offering’ of unprotected sex.

Maybe a selfish part of me is hoping your a suspect account, as I really do want to see her again.

PS: you indeed have an Indian girls name.

[bobita18]

I’m not reading this as BB.
More the SP allowing cum or piss on her pussy and arsehole.
Still risky but more for her than him.

You understand perfect what i wanted to say in the post!

[pa5151]

You need to be clearer here, you took off the condom and put your cock bareback in her ass and came? Or you had your cock outside and came over her ass?

[Momodan38]

You understand perfect what i wanted to say in the post!

You haven’t really clarified anything, instead your causing more confusion. Please answer my and pa5151’s questions. If true it will really help. Any of, if not all the scenarios you have implied have serious health consequences to the girl and/or the punters.

I’ll surmise questions as follows -

1) Did she offer bareback sex in both holes?
2) Did you have bareback sex, i.e did you penetrate her at all without a condom in any holes?
3) Did you cum inside of her in any holes? Or
4) Did you cum over (meaning outside) on any holes.

Like I said, I assume English is your second language so lack of clarity can be pardoned from your part.

Please OP, give clear answers. Thanks.

[iq129]

The OP is talking in riddles and he is confusing everyone. Simple questions need simple and not vague answers.

[iq129]

You haven’t really clarified anything, instead your causing more confusion. Please answer my and pa5151’s questions. If true it will really help. Any of, if not all the scenarios you have implied have serious health consequences to the girl and/or the punters.

I’ll surmise questions as follows -

1) Did she offer bareback sex in both holes?
2) Did you have bareback sex, i.e did you penetrate her at all without a condom in any holes?
3) Did you cum inside of her in any holes? Or
4) Did you cum over (meaning outside) on any holes.

Like I said, I assume English is your second language so lack of clarity can be pardoned from your part.

Please OP, give clear answers. Thanks.

The above questions just need a simple YES or NO answers, so speaking or understanding English is not a major issue here. Google translate is available for free in any case.

[Momodan38]

The above questions just need a simple YES or NO answers, so speaking or understanding English is not a major issue here. Google translate is available for free in any case.

OP might think he has a good grasp of the English language. In any case your right, simple yes or no answers will suffice.

[bushman]

You haven’t really clarified anything, instead your causing more confusion. Please answer my and pa5151’s questions. If true it will really help. Any of, if not all the scenarios you have implied have serious health consequences to the girl and/or the punters.

I’ll surmise questions as follows -

1) Did she offer bareback sex in both holes?
2) Did you have bareback sex, i.e did you penetrate her at all without a condom in any holes?
3) Did you cum inside of her in any holes? Or
4) Did you cum over (meaning outside) on any holes.

Like I said, I assume English is your second language so lack of clarity can be pardoned from your part.

Please OP, give clear answers. Thanks.

OP to make it easier on you, would you say the following is correct?

1. No
2. No
3. No
4. Yes.

You only have to answer a single yes/no.

[Tomcat]

To me now this punt seems suspect, bedtime story.💤

[bobita18]

Sorry for any misunderstanding. Maybe my words are not understand but most of you just jumped with different conclusions. Please read my review again.
This time i m trying to be more explicit!
I said i didn’t had bb sex with her. And in the end i removed the condom and cum over her but hole. She opened her hole allowing the sperm going inside her saying she like cum in her ass. I just raised the concern about the fluids going inside her.

[bobita18]

OP to make it easier on you, would you say the following is correct?

1. No
2. No
3. No
4. Yes.

You only have to answer a single yes/no.

Yes. These are the answers

[Momodan38]

Yes. These are the answers

Ok thanks for finally clarifying. If true then not as bad as initialy implied by yourself.

She never offered BB, only allowed you to cum over her arse (NOT inside) and allowed some cum to slip inside her anal. Again if true, a little worrying but a health risk for her and not the punter as I understand it.

If true that is.... time and more reviews will tell.

[Meursault]

Looks trans to me.
Not my look anyway, but thanks OP

[Deeplove]

The OP went back to her even after this suspected cum inside confusion

Don't understand why he would go back after bringing up the fluid inside fiasco

[CoolTiger]

The OP went back to her even after this suspected cum inside confusion

Don't understand why he would go back after bringing up the fluid inside fiasco

Sorry for any misunderstanding. Maybe my words are not understand but most of you just jumped with different conclusions. Please read my review again.
This time i m trying to be more explicit!
I said i didn’t had bb sex with her. And in the end i removed the condom and cum over her but hole. She opened her hole allowing the sperm going inside her saying she like cum in her ass. I just raised the concern about the fluids going inside her.

He clarified what happened. Why still the confusion?