RubyxOxO Leeds - Timewaster

[Ponty]

I'm a little cautious about putting reviews in these days and only tend to do it with the permission of the SP. However this one really needs to be put out there to save others any hassle. There's at least one other negative review for this SP for timewasting, which significantly I chose to ignore when I tried to book. The initial comms by text were prompt and efficient. A date and a time was agreed and I even texted her 5 mins before setting off to which I received a prompt 'Ok' in reply. Forty minutes later I arrived at the destination and texted my arrival.....I waited a few minutes and then texted again.....several texts later still nothing. Waited 10 minutes past my allotted time and still no response. I left obviously deflated but thinking I'd probably dodged a bullet. It would be interesting to know what kind of service she provides when she does actually see punters? I've yet to see a review.

Moderator, can you please add link?

[Goldfinch]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[Ponty]

Thanks 

[Goldfinch]

Thanks 

[mrfishyfoo]

I'm a little cautious about putting reviews in these days and only tend to do it with the permission of the SP. However this one really needs to be put out there to save others any hassle. There's at least one other negative review for this SP for timewasting, which significantly I chose to ignore when I tried to book. The initial comms by text were prompt and efficient. A date and a time was agreed and I even texted her 5 mins before setting off to which I received a prompt 'Ok' in reply. Forty minutes later I arrived at the destination and texted my arrival.....I waited a few minutes and then texted again.....several texts later still nothing. Waited 10 minutes past my allotted time and still no response. I left obviously deflated but thinking I'd probably dodged a bullet. It would be interesting to know what kind of service she provides when she does actually see punters? I've yet to see a review.

Moderator, can you please add link?

[Ponty]

Try and do your fellow man a favour and you get torn apart yourself. This is not about my posting preferences, its about saving people from hassle. Can we keep some focus on the real issue here!

[Ponty]

And I'd just like to say in mitigation that I'm 'cautious ' for what I believe is a good reason. Infact it took a fair bit of courage on my behalf to get this review out in the first place.

[ISTS2005]

And I'd just like to say in mitigation that I'm 'cautious ' for what I believe is a good reason. Infact it took a fair bit of courage on my behalf to get this review out in the first place.

I think the issue is, you're obviously going to hold back on anything negtaive or for us to be wary of, as they are likely to not grant you the permission to post that. So anything you post is vetted by an SP first effectively? Which makes your reviews now rather undermined in my view and no doubt most of the rest of the board?

[The0neAnd0nly]

I think the issue is, you're obviously going to hold back on anything negtaive or for us to be wary of, as they are likely to not grant you the permission to post that. So anything you post is vetted by an SP first effectively? Which makes your reviews now rather undermined in my view and no doubt most of the rest of the board?

+1 - grow up man. You only post a review with permission of a SP?...think you fail to understand the point of this website and the reason reviews are left in the first place 

[viper13]

I think the issue is, you're obviously going to hold back on anything negtaive or for us to be wary of, as they are likely to not grant you the permission to post that. So anything you post is vetted by an SP first effectively? Which makes your reviews now rather undermined in my view and no doubt most of the rest of the board?

+1

OP might as well just stick to doing SPs reviews on their AW profile, which we know are not to be reliable.
Just like any future reviews from OP on here